REVIEW SUMMARY: Zombies will never shamble again.
MY RATING: 
BRIEF SYNOPSIS: While the original Romero film was comedic and filled with social commentary, the Zack Snyder remake pulls out the stops and delivers the most tense zombie experience yet.
MY REVIEW:
PROS: Zombies scramble, not shamble; Excellent opening scenes showing how the zombie virus catches society unaware; extremely tense action scenes; character development.
CONS: A bit laggy in the middle of the film; unnecessary baby zombie scene was not tense, frightening or gross.
BOTTOM LINE: If you're a fan of zombie horror, don't miss this film. Also good if you like tense action films.
I'll go out on a limb here (though not a very long limb) by saying that I think we've seen the last film where zombies shamble across the screen. With 28 Days Later (see my sfsignal review at http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/000013.html), director Danny Boyle stepped up the pace by having the zombies race at their victims, hell-bent on tearing up live human flesh. That film wasn't perfect, but I found these new zombies far more frightening than any I'd seen before.
With the remake of Dawn of the Dead, the fright-factor is stepped up several notches to the point where I'd call this the scariest zombie film I've ever seen.
I really like zombie movies for several reasons, the biggest of which is they're usually apocalyptic, and I like decay-of-society movies. Second, they usually put characters in situations that require them to use their heads to get out alive, and I like wondering throughout the film what I would do in the characters' shoes. This is opposed to most slasher films, in which stupid characters do inane things, and there's absolutely no mental challenge for the viewer at all.
In the first half-hour of DotD, we see a society (specifically Milwaukee) completely unprepared for the zombie infestation, and not understanding until too late what was happening. The opening scenes where one of the lead characters, a nurse, wakes up in her suburban Milwaukee neighborhood to witness the beginning of the attacks was truly inspired horror film-making.
The film keeps giving 500' views over the action so that the audience can see things go from bad to worse to completely insane. At the beginning, the arial shows a calm, normal suburban neighborhood. The same shot the next morning shows some houses on fire, cars careening out of control and smashing into each other and pedestrians, and people being chased through yards by their dead neighbors.
As in the original movie, a handful of survivors make their way to a shopping mall stocked with everything they need to survive, at least for the short term (and assuming you don't mind drinking anything but half-caf double decaf lattes and eating biscotti.) While the original Romero version took place almost completely in the mall, the remake has a good chunk at the beginning where the nurse struggles to get to the mall, and a very tense section at the end where all of the survivors 'make a break' for safety.
In many ways this movie reminded me of the movie Aliens. Like that film, DotD has a small number of people, secluded and in confined space battling hoardes of enemies hell-bent on their destruction. The hold-your-breath intensity of Aliens is recaptured here, and that's not done well very often. And like Aliens, there's one obligatory idiot who only looks out for himself (though it's not who you might initially THINK it is!)
I really, really liked this film. Overall I think it is must-see for zombie horror fanboys, and a should-see for those looking for good, tense action.
Oh, and don't leave the theatre before the credits are through rolling. Hmm, or maybe you should...
Comments (1)
| PermaLink
| Category: Movies
Posted by APEGamer at Sunday April 04, 2004 at 8:02 PM
© 2008 SF Signal
Just saw the Dawn of the Dead last night. Unfortunately, I cannot say I?d recommend this film.
True, the opening was strong but ultimately it set my expectations too high. (Maybe another thing that set my expectations too high was the writing credit for James Gunn. Only now does it make sense that this James Gunn is the screenwriter for Scooby-Doo and not sf author James Gunn. Whew!)
The movie suffers from the same annoyances that I have with most horror movies ? the characters do silly things. Like Kevin mentions, the whole baby scene was silly. But let?s forget that for now. What bugs me about it was that the guy was able to hide the mother from the rest of the group, already leery about people being infected. Another example: the nurse character finds it strange that one victim in their midst (infected after a bite) has an unexpected temperature drop but does not expect her to turn. Another example: the girl who leaves the relative safety of the mall (let?s assume that a mall truly can be a secure place) by stealing a truck to rescue a dog across a sea of zombies. Or, when the hero knows the dog-rescuer is about to be attacked by a zombie, but refuses to heed the advice of the cop and tell her via walkie-talkie to get out of there. Or, when they try to fix the electrical generators in the dark when the mall has a sporting goods store which could have lanterns.
Sigh.
Having recently saw Shaun of the Dead and having liked it, it occurs to me that what I liked about it was that it did not take itself too seriously (OK, that movie was a comedy) and the things the characters did made sense given the situation.
Final rating for Dawn of the Dead: 2 out of 5.
Posted by John on Monday February 07, 2005 at 8:06 AM at 8:06 AM