sfsignal


News Feeds
Add to Google Entries
Add to Google Commments

Subscribe with FeedBurner
Search


« SF Tidbits for 7/25/06 | Home | More Kids Reading, Thanks to Harry Potter »
« SF Tidbits for 7/25/06 | Home | More Kids Reading, Thanks to Harry Potter »
Another Literary Debate

Author Will Shetterly asks: Is "literary and genre" a clumsy distinction? The post is interesting and the comments even more so. They touch upon some of the literary-type discussions we've had here.

There are many statements this post that resonate with me: Story and style crossing genre boundaries; not liking a book of a certain type; reading fiction to be entertained, and Rebecca Ore's sentiment that [paraphrasing] "If writing stories that show technology and science...is worth doing, it's worth doing...well."

As I ponder more and more about this, I am reminded that the reader play a crucial role as well. My own moods play into my enjoyment of books and stories. Sometimes I am in the mood for slam-bang action and sometimes I'm looking for something literary. (Deferring the quagmire of a discussion of exactly what that means, I will say that I am currently reading the fantasy story "The Cosmology of the Wider World" by Jeffrey Ford. It's literate and likable and a story which is helping me pinpoint my hit-and-miss track record with fantasy. More to come in a later post.)

Anyway, it's always entertaining to read Another Literary Debate as it pertains to science fiction, eh?

Share: | Posted by John on Tuesday July 25, 2006 - 12:35 AM | Category: Books | © 2006 SF Signal



Comments


Post a Comment









Remember personal info?



[Use a smiley: Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley ]
[Use shortcuts: URL, BOLD or ITALICIZE ]