Matt Cheney digs up a seriously retro review by Time magazine (?!?) of Stanley Weinbaum's collection A Martian Odyssey which offers some reflections on the sf field we now call "classic":
Small publishing houses devoted to science fiction such as Weinbaum turned out have been mushrooming during the last few years, and the business as a whole appears to be on the upgrade. Most of them are three-or four-man affairs. The half-dozen or so outfits in the field each print anywhere from two to a dozen books a year. Press runs usually hover around 5,000. Yet such midget firms as Prime Press in Philadelphia, Fantasy Press in Reading, Pa. and Shasta Press in Chicago eke out profits from their small printings, for two reasons: 1) they keep advertising and other overhead costs to a minimum, and 2) they can count on regular patronage from their own rabid fans.Apparently in 1949, science fiction was a "fad" that had "rabid" fans. Oh well, at least they got the "rabid" part right....
There has been some speculation about the reasons for the science-fiction fad. The Saturday Review of Literature's Harrison Smith has speculated about the relation of the "age of anxiety" to the "scientific fantasy story" as "a buffer against known and more conceivable terrors." Publishers' Weekly finds that the appeal of these stories lies "in their free flight of [imagination] . . . uninhibited by present reality, yet sometimes terrifyingly close to the advanced discoveries of modern science."The reader who reads science fiction dispassionately is likely to be struck by how closely the human imagination is tied to reality, even when it deliberately sets out to violate it. Stanley Weinbaum's loonies and slinkers have been seen before. The shapes may be different, but his dream-beasts come startlingly close to what the human race has been running across, for a good many years, in its childish nightmares.
Comments (4)
| PermaLink
| Category: Books
Posted by John DeNardo at Tuesday January 16, 2007 at 12:54 AM
© 2008 SF Signal
Well, back in 1949, "Time" Magazine was a fairly stuffy, high-brow and Republican magazine. They were a lot closer to, say, "The New Yorker" of today then the populist magazine they are now.
Posted by Chris Gerrib on Tuesday January 16, 2007 at 9:15 AM at 9:15 AM
Science fiction is still a fad.
Posted by Fred Kiesche on Tuesday January 16, 2007 at 11:10 AM at 11:10 AM
I don't think its a fad
anymore. Science Fiction
is now more mainstream
then anything else. Our
own Space Channel has
put horror movies as part
of it's line up. Some book
stores mix Science fiction
with Fantasy. Fantasy is not
SF. A quick look at the
authors over at Fantastic
Fiction show authors in all
kinds of genres. Even Playboy
has been publishing SF stories
for years. Just off the top
of my head I'd say Science
Fiction in the 30'50's was a
fad, then in the 60's, 70's,
80's became underground. Now
SF thanks to the Internet
is more mainstream then before
more accessible.
Posted by Jim Shannon on Tuesday January 16, 2007 at 3:17 PM at 3:17 PM