REVIEW SUMMARY: A fun book for hardcore SF fans, but of marginal interest to others.| Science Fiction Citations Website | Brave New Words |
| cyberspace (n.) the notional environment within which electronic communication occurs, esp. when represented as the inside of a computer system; space perceived as such by an observer but generated by a computer system and having no real existence; the space of virtual reality. (19 citations) matrix (n.)= cyberspace (21 citations) | cyberspace (n.) the entirety of the data stored in, and the communication that takes place within, a computer network, conceived of as having the properties of a physical realm; the environment of virtual reality. Compare MATRIX. (5 citations) matrix (n.) CYBERSPACE or virtual reality (4 citations) |
| future history (n.) a fictional, self-contained, consistent, chronological framework (esp. realized across a body of work); (also) the subgenre of science fiction that uses such a framework (6 citations) | future history (n.) a chronology of the future, as realized in a series of stories set in the same fictional universe; such a series of stories. (6 citations) |
| grok (v.) to perceive or understand fully; to feel empathy with; to enjoy, appreciate. (5 citations) | grok (v.) [coined by Robert A. Heinlein] to understand deeply or intuitively; to establish rapport; to enjoy. (10 citations) |
| infodump (n.) a large (often unwieldy or indigestible) amount of information supplied all at once; spec. as background or descriptive information in a narrative. (4 citations) | infodump (n.) a large amount of background information inserted into a story all at once. (6 citations) |
| mundane (n.) a person who does not share the interests of a particular group of enthusiasts (used esp. among science fiction fans). (6 citations) mundane (adj.) belonging or relating to the world which lies outside the sphere of interest of a particular group of enthusiasts (used esp. among science fiction fans, originally of mainstream fiction). (17 citations) | mundane (n.) a person who is not a science fiction fan; by extension, a person who is an outsider to some group. (6 citations) mundane (adj.) not relating to science fiction or science fiction fandom, or by extension, to a specific group or subject; (of literature) mainstream. (7 citations) |
| precog (n.) a person with precognitive abilities. (4 citations) precog (v.) to predict the future by precognitive powers. (2 citations) | precog (n.) [abbr. of precognition] someone who can see the future; someone with the psychic ability of precognition. (6 citations) precog (v.) to see or predict the future. (3 citations) |
| NO ENTRY | redshirt (n.) [after the red shirts worn by crewmembers in the television show Star Trek, who were frequently killed after arriving on a new planet] a character who is not portrayed in any depth; an extra; especially one whose main plot function is to be killed. (4 citations) |
| science fiction (n.) Imaginative fiction based on postulated scientific discoveries or spectacular environmental changes, freq. set in the future or on other planets and involving space or time travel (11 citations) | science fiction (n.) 1. a genre (of literature, film, etc.) in which the setting differs from our own world (e.g. by the invention of new technology, through contact with aliens, by having a different history, etc.), and in which the difference is based on extrapolations made from one or more suppositions; hence, such a genre in which the difference (explicitly or implicitly) in scientific or rational, as opposed to supernatural, terms. 2. a work of science fiction. 3. IMAGINATIVE FICTION. (18 citations) |
| slipstream (n.) fiction which, while not classified as science fiction, engages to some extent with scientific or futuristic subject matter, esp. such fiction regarded as constituting an identifiable genre; this genre of fiction. (13 citations) | slipstream (n.) [after mainstream] literature which makes use of the tropes or techniques of genre science fiction or fantasy, but which is not considered to be genre science fiction or fantasy; the genre of such literature. Hence slipstreamer. (n.), slipstreamish, (adj.), slipstreamy, (adj.) (8 citations) |
| space opera (n.) a genre of science fiction which uses stock characters and settings, especially those of Westerns translated into outer space; a genre of science fiction in which the action spans across a galaxy or galaxies; a work of these genres. (23 citations) | space opera (n.) [by analogy to soap opera and horse opera] science fiction with an interplanetary or galaxy-wide setting, especially one making use of stock characters and situations; a work of this type. (7 citations) |
| Sturgeon's Law (n.) a humorous aphorism which maintains that most of any body of published material, knowledge, etc., or (more generally) of everything is worthless: based on a statement by Sturgeon, usually later cited as '90 per cent of everything is crap'. (7 citations) | Sturgeon's Law (n.) [after Theodore Sturgeon, who first proposed it] a humorous aphorism that holds that ninety percent of any realm of endeavor, or more generally, of everything, is worthless; usually in the form of "ninety percent of everything is crap." [In a letter to the OED, Fruma Klass (wife of science fiction writer Phil Klass, a.k.a. William Tenn) writes that Sturgeon first used the phrase "ninety percent of everything is crud" in a lecture he and Tenn gave at New York University in the early 1950's.] (8 citations) |
| time paradox (n.) a paradox caused by an action of a time traveler which renders the action logically no longer possible, such as the murder of the time traveler's grandfather at a time before the time traveler's father had been conceived. (9 citations) | time paradox (n.) an event or condition, caused by something a time traveler does while in the past, that is logically impossible based on the state of the universe in their original time. (6 citations) |
Share:
| Posted by John on Tuesday May 15, 2007 - 12:55 AM
| Category: Book Review
| © 2007 SF Signal
So, it lost two stars mainly because of website overlap?
Posted by Paul on Tuesday May 15, 2007 at 4:42 AM
John,
This is an intervention: I believe that your "biblioholism" has moved onto a more advanced stage with the primary symptom of reading DICTIONARIES! What will be next? The phone book? The Chinese restaurant menu? Please stop before it kills you. You have friends and family -- there is more to life than gettting that next volume, that next stack...
Your friend,
Peter
![]()
Posted by Peter on Tuesday May 15, 2007 at 7:23 AM
I would detract a point for it being a trade paperback costing $30.
Yes, I know most places sell it cheaper, but MonkeyBrain
Press routinely sells similarly sized tomes featuring equally exhaustive research for $15.
Posted by Jeff P on Tuesday May 15, 2007 at 7:27 AM
Paul: Mostly. At times the book felt like an abbreviated version of the website. Keep in mind that 3 stars means "good". The book is good...it just doesn't feel "great". And I see you liked it, too!
Peter: Point taken. I'll follow your cue and devote more time to Maxim and supermodels. ![]()
Jeff: I try not to let price come in to play because I have no way of determining how a random reader values the dollar. One person might read this review and determine that the price is fair, another might balk. The best I can do is note my impressions.
Posted by John on Tuesday May 15, 2007 at 7:36 AM
Peter, I personally am addicted to oddball reference books: The Dictionary of Gods, the Encyclopedia of Angels, The Dictionary of Imaginary Places, several Encyclopediae of Science Fiction, not to mention mock-documentary books like Barlowe's Expedition and Kofeod's Galactic Geographic and series-specific guidebooks like Peter Hamilton's Confederation Handbook and Brin's guide to the Uplift universe (I forget the name of that one). Jess Nevins Fantastic Victoriana is perhaps my favorite.
Off-genre, Rocklopedia Fakebandica is possibly the greatest useless reference book ever.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rocklopedia_Fakebandica
Posted by Jeff P on Tuesday May 15, 2007 at 8:37 AM
Hi
We will also be reviewing this title on www.concatenation.org with our Autumnal season upload.
Re: point about trade paperback. Reference books tend to come out in hardback first as libraries prefere them to paperbacks (even trade paperbacks).
Re: Point about reviewing dictionaries. In case this was not a joke, it is worth noting that in academia specialist dictionaries are reviewed all the time as nomenclature developments are important (cf. biology and 7 kingdoms). So from my perspective (as a scientist, reviewer and former journal manager) a review like this is not unusual but expected.
Seems a good review.
Regards
Jonathan
Posted by Jonathan on Tuesday May 15, 2007 at 9:23 AM
John: Yes, yes I did like it myself. I suppose that I look for ways to knock off a score from perfect, and so I interpret a 3 star rating as 5-2, not 0+3. So that's the way I saw how you came to that rating.
Jeff: I own a couple of those, too...
Posted by Paul on Tuesday May 15, 2007 at 11:47 AM