
Prompted by Jeff Vehige's review of A Fire Upon the Deep by Vernor Vinge, I dug out my copy of David Hartwell's book Age of Wonders: Exploring the World of Science Fiction. Chapter 8, "Science Fiction Writers Can't Write for Sour Apples", lists Hartwell's picks for "Literary" novels that would be loved by readers uninitiated in the wonders of science fiction:
Also: Here is the passage that precedes Hartwell's list:
There is no doubt that a significant number of science fiction writers today consider themselves literary artists, and a large number consider themselves traditional paid entertainers. But because of the newer attitude, I believe that the likelihood that a work of SF may be a substantial work of literature has been greatly increased. It is not my place to declare who the real artists are and are not. But looking back over the past decades, it is evident that certain works are outstanding in their execution and will repay a reader who does not have an initiation into the special pleasures that come from long acquaintance with the SF field.
Share:
| Posted by John on Wednesday June 06, 2007 - 12:48 AM
| Category: Books
| © 2007 SF Signal
Thanks for the link! I only have the old 1985 edition of THE AGE OF WONDERS.
- Jeff
Posted by Jeff Vehige on Wednesday June 06, 2007 at 8:45 AM
I have read only 2 from this list - Caves of Steel & Childhood's End. If they are representative of others in the list, I will say this list is geared towards soft sf - lot of human elements, some magic, & very little in the way of realism - even if futuristic. Caves is essentially a murder mystery; Childhood's End is mostly religion. Hard sf fans will likely be disappointed.
Posted by tinkoo on Wednesday June 06, 2007 at 1:23 PM
If Caves of Steel is literary, that doesn't speak well of the other books. Does it contain a single interesting sentence? Dialogue that rings true? Any but the stiffest exchanges? As for the mystery, the protagonist is like a simple-minded version of Encyclopedia Brown, and most of his deductions are silly. Yikes.
Posted by Bill P on Wednesday June 06, 2007 at 6:22 PM
Bill, take the quoted "Literary" with a grain of salt -- the emphasis should be on "Gateway".
Encyclopedia Brown...heh-heh... ![]()
Posted by John on Wednesday June 06, 2007 at 8:18 PM
Dhalgren? Look, I love Delany's stuff, but I think there are several of his books I'd use as a "gateway" before I handed that one out. Nova, for example.
Posted by Fred Kiesche on Wednesday June 06, 2007 at 9:33 PM
I really don't think a true "gateway" SciFi novel should be more than 5 or 10 years old. Only hardcore SciFi fans are going to pick up a SciFi novel written in the 50s, 60s or 70s. Why not list recent books by Robert J. Sawyer or Joe Haldeman? They certainly have more crossover appeal than anything on this list.
Posted by David on Thursday September 20, 2007 at 9:07 AM