sfsignal


News Feeds
Add to Google Entries
Add to Google Commments

Subscribe with FeedBurner
Search


« SF Tidbits for 4/9/08 | Home | INTERVIEW: Dr. Michio Kaku »
« SF Tidbits for 4/9/08 | Home | INTERVIEW: Dr. Michio Kaku »
Tube Bits for 04/09/2008

Share: | Posted by JP on Wednesday April 09, 2008 - 12:15 AM | Category: Tube Bits | © 2008 SF Signal



Comments

I read somewhere that even though Firefly was shot on film large enough to make a difference in HD, since it wasn't broadcast in HD when it was one Fox all of the CGI was done in standard def. I've seen a few Firefly episodes on Universal HD when I was at a friend's house, and it seemed like the CGI shots were blurrier than the live action.

Posted by Jason on Wednesday April 09, 2008 at 9:49 AM

Yes, Jericho is worth saving. But I doubt Comcast will be the savior. Scifi Channel would be a better home, especially if they got rid of all the Stargate crap.

Posted by horseloverfat on Wednesday April 09, 2008 at 1:32 PM

Jericho is definitely worth saving. OK, much of the acting sucked, and the romantic plotlines were laughable, but I thought this was actually pretty good science fiction: the premises were well thought out and followed to their logical conclusions, and much of the action was very exciting. I felt like they were working at the kinks as the show went along (well, nothing to be done about the actors, aside from killing off the characters).

Posted by Jeremy Smith on Thursday April 10, 2008 at 8:14 AM

No fight scene that isn't over sunglasses should be that long or lame.

Posted by Fred on Thursday April 10, 2008 at 8:40 PM



Post a Comment









Remember personal info?



[Use a smiley: Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley Add this smiley ]
[Use shortcuts: URL, BOLD or ITALICIZE ]