![]()
Comments (4)
| PermaLink
| Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Tuesday July 01, 2008 at 12:07 AM
© 2008 SF Signal
Alas, another chance to ask the ultimate Varley question missed: "So, Mr. Varley, are you ever going to finish that third book in the 'Metals' trilogy that your fans have been waiting for?"
Posted by Fred Kiesche on Tuesday July 01, 2008 at 1:29 PM at 1:29 PM
Re: The Arthur C. Clarke interview,
One final question, and I think you guess what it's about. In this year of 2001, what are your thoughts about the movie? ...Clarke: Having just seen the special edition Stanley has been working on for the last five years of his life: it couldn't have been done better even now—merely in a 10th of the time, thanks to today's computers!
Excuse me, did I miss something? What special edition?
Posted by Matte Lozenge on Wednesday July 02, 2008 at 6:16 PM at 6:16 PM
Hmmm...there were two edition released in 2001 (a basic disc and boxed set -- both part of the Stanley Kubrick Collection). But one labeled "Special Edition" did not appear until later, in October 2007. (Mouse over image and clikum linkum.)
Posted by John on Wednesday July 02, 2008 at 9:29 PM at 9:29 PM
I guess Clarke was talking about the version released in 2001. Wikipedia says
The 2001 release contained the re-release trailer, the film in the original 2.21:1 aspect ratio, digitally re-mastered from the original 70 mm print, and the soundtrack remixed in 5.1 surround sound.
I suppose I can believe Kubrick spent 5 years just on tweaking the picture and sound of the film to his satisfaction. He had that reputation for obsessiveness; even so that's kinda extreme.
But if that's what he wanted to do -- I'm happy to enjoy the fruits of his labor!
Posted by Matte Lozenge on Wednesday July 02, 2008 at 10:31 PM at 10:31 PM