Stay Connected:
Subscribe to our feed

Subscribe with FeedBurner




PREVIOUS POST
« REVIEW: Rogue Moon by Algis Budrys
NEXT POST
Orson Scott Card Hates Star Trek »
Sci-fi Blasted Off Long Before Trek, Wars

So says an article in the Milwaukee Sentinel Journal.

Bookmark and Share
Comment on this post Comments (3) | PermaLink | Category: Meta
Posted by John DeNardo at Monday May 02, 2005 at 7:44 AM
© 2005 SF Signal



What a condescending article.

Posted by Jeff on Monday May 02, 2005 at 2:00 PM

You know, I kinda felt the same way. Sure, SF has been around for a long time, but it wasn't really 'acceptable' (still hasn't lost a lot of negative conotations still) or popular until 'Star Wars'. SW is what broke SF into the mainstream pop culture and its been there, to varying degrees, ever since, especially in the realm of the silver screen.

I got a 'sour grapes' feel from the article. The interviewees seem to want to discount the popular affect of ST and SW because their works, in their eyes of course, are 'better'. I bet they'd be singing a different tune if they had produced SW instead of Lucas.

Oh, and another thought. Would ST have had the run it has if not for SW reviving interes in SF at all? I don't think so.

Posted by JP on Monday May 02, 2005 at 2:54 PM

Well...doh...where did they think Lucas and Roddenberry stole all their ideas from? John Campbell, not Joseph Campbell!

Posted by Fred Kiesche on Monday May 02, 2005 at 8:11 PM

Post a Comment
(Will not be displayed)
Remember me?
   

[Note: Do not paste from WYSIWYG programs like MS Word, or formatting code will appear in your comment.]