<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REVIEW: Designated Targets by John Birmingham</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2005/12/review_designated_targets_by_john_birmingham/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2005/12/review_designated_targets_by_john_birmingham/</link>
	<description>A science fiction blog featuring science fiction book reviews and with frequent ramblings on fantasy, computers and the web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:36:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter D. Tillman</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2005/12/review_designated_targets_by_john_birmingham/#comment-68428</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter D. Tillman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2005/12/review_designated_targets_by_john_birmingham/#comment-68428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm, odd software.

Try #2 for URLS:

Wikipedia article:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis_of_Time

My review, WoC:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0345457129/

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, odd software.</p>
<p>Try #2 for URLS:</p>
<p>Wikipedia article:  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis_of_Time" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis_of_Time</a></p>
<p>My review, WoC:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0345457129/" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0345457129/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter D. Tillman</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2005/12/review_designated_targets_by_john_birmingham/#comment-68427</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter D. Tillman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2005/12/review_designated_targets_by_john_birmingham/#comment-68427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The AXIS OF TIME wikipedia article  has a whole list of Tuckerized characters. I must say, I found these overcute and distracting. Otherwise, excellent book and I agree, an improvement over #1.

Happy reading--

Pete Tillman

My review of WEAPONS OF CHOICE:

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AXIS OF TIME wikipedia article  has a whole list of Tuckerized characters. I must say, I found these overcute and distracting. Otherwise, excellent book and I agree, an improvement over #1.</p>
<p>Happy reading&#8211;</p>
<p>Pete Tillman</p>
<p>My review of WEAPONS OF CHOICE:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2005/12/review_designated_targets_by_john_birmingham/#comment-68426</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 06:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2005/12/review_designated_targets_by_john_birmingham/#comment-68426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He does have a blog, but sadly there appears to be no reference to Klausner there.  His blog is &lt;a href=&quot;http://birmo.journalspace.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://birmo.journalspace.com&lt;/a&gt;.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He does have a blog, but sadly there appears to be no reference to Klausner there.  His blog is <a href="http://birmo.journalspace.com" rel="nofollow">http://birmo.journalspace.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2005/12/review_designated_targets_by_john_birmingham/#comment-68425</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 05:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2005/12/review_designated_targets_by_john_birmingham/#comment-68425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is hard to know what Birmingham meant by including her - the character is very minor, and has little to say (I think two lines of dialog, one of which is the explative, &#039;sup bitch&#039;.)  I&#039;m also not so sure that she would mention it if she saw it - she might be embarrased to see the characters name, expecially if the character is unflattering (which the character isn&#039;t, exactly.)  I wonder if Birmingham has a blog?

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is hard to know what Birmingham meant by including her &#8211; the character is very minor, and has little to say (I think two lines of dialog, one of which is the explative, &#8216;sup bitch&#8217;.)  I&#8217;m also not so sure that she would mention it if she saw it &#8211; she might be embarrased to see the characters name, expecially if the character is unflattering (which the character isn&#8217;t, exactly.)  I wonder if Birmingham has a blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2005/12/review_designated_targets_by_john_birmingham/#comment-68424</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 05:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2005/12/review_designated_targets_by_john_birmingham/#comment-68424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(6) Don&#039;t get me started on Harriet Klausner.

This was the book that Charles &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/000112.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pointed out&lt;/a&gt; on this very blog that used her name.  The supposition, which I agree with, is that this was a test to see if HK read the material she &quot;reviews&quot;.  Certainly, if your name appears in a book, you&#039;d mention as much in your review, wouldn&#039;t you?  Well, HK&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/customer-reviews/0345457145/ref=cm_rev_next/103-1156908-7755840?%5Fencoding=UTF8&amp;customer-reviews.sort%5Fby=-SubmissionDate&amp;n=283155&amp;s=books&amp;customer-reviews.start=21&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;5-star&lt;/a&gt; (natch) &lt;a href=&quot;http://harrietklausner.wwwi.com/review.cgi?designated_targets&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;review&lt;/a&gt; didn&#039;t even mention her own name.  Maybe that&#039;s because it didn&#039;t appear on the dust jacket. :-@

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(6) Don&#8217;t get me started on Harriet Klausner.</p>
<p>This was the book that Charles <a href="http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/000112.html" rel="nofollow">pointed out</a> on this very blog that used her name.  The supposition, which I agree with, is that this was a test to see if HK read the material she &#8220;reviews&#8221;.  Certainly, if your name appears in a book, you&#8217;d mention as much in your review, wouldn&#8217;t you?  Well, HK&#8217;s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/customer-reviews/0345457145/ref=cm_rev_next/103-1156908-7755840?%5Fencoding=UTF8&#038;customer-reviews.sort%5Fby=-SubmissionDate&#038;n=283155&#038;s=books&#038;customer-reviews.start=21" rel="nofollow">5-star</a> (natch) <a href="http://harrietklausner.wwwi.com/review.cgi?designated_targets" rel="nofollow">review</a> didn&#8217;t even mention her own name.  Maybe that&#8217;s because it didn&#8217;t appear on the dust jacket. :-@</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
