
REVIEW SUMMARY: Depending on how you squint at it, this is either sf or mainstream, but either way it's a very good book.
MY RATING: ![]()
BRIEF SYNOPSIS: Four college roommates travel across the country in search of immortality. Only two will get it, but only if the third commits suicide and the fourth is sacrificed.
MY REVIEW:
PROS: Superbly written; intriguing plot; a good mood piece.
CONS: I was expecting science fiction and got mainstream.
BOTTOM LINE: A very enjoyable book that left me feeling deliciously somber.
If you plan on reading Robert Silverberg's The Book of Skulls - and you should - go into it knowing that it's one of those books labeled "science fiction" that reads more like mainstream fiction.
The premise is simple enough but with an element of the fantastic thrown in. Four college roommates embark on a quest for immortality when one of them, the scholarly Eli, discovers an ancient manuscript in the university library. He convinces his roommates - Timothy the spoiled rich kid; Ned the gay poet; Oliver the bright farm boy - to join him on his quest because immortality is only granted under certain conditions: four candidates must appear together but only two will achieve immortality in the Brotherhood of the Skulls. Of the other two, one must commit suicide and one must be sacrificed.
Today (this book was written in 1972) this sounds like the premise for a cheap reality show and so it is no wonder that the young men search for the Brotherhood only half-believing it's true. Logic tells them this is a hoax but the desire to live forever is so strong within them that any chance, no matter how remote, is worth a look. So they travel from New England to Arizona in search of the mysterious Brotherhood. The trip itself takes about half the book while the second half involves their trials.
But the plot, as intriguing as it is, is only secondary in The Book of Skulls. The book is really a character study - a four character study to be exact. The narrative is structured in alternating first-person views from each character. Through their eyes and thoughts we learn about their histories and background, their thoughts and fears, their sexual escapades and prejudices, their weaknesses and their secrets. (Oh they have secrets!) And the mood of the story is perfect for their quest. Each reading session left me feeling introspective and the ending left me feeling wonderfully somber.
This isn't the kind of book that blows you away but its poetic writing and insightful look into the minds of its characters makes you keeps eating it up anyway. (This, by the way, was what I was hoping for in Geoff Ryman's 253: The Print Remix but, alas, the structure of that book was too limiting to be effective.) Silverberg shows his command over the written word (again and again) with every page. You get to know these characters, even if you don't necessarily like them. They play well within their own narratives as well as in the interaction with each other. Who will willingly commit suicide to help his friends? Who will be killed to save the remaining two? These are questions you keep asking throughout the book, but the answers don't really matter. It's the personal peek we get into their lives that holds your interest. The question of immortality is only secondary.
And therein sits an issue I had with the book. Well, not an issue so much as an unmet expectation. The book is labeled as science fiction and has a plot that reeks of fantasy, but it reads like neither of these. This book could just as easily be classified as mainstream fiction. This is not a bad thing in itself - genre definition should be an aside, right? A good story is a good story, isn't it? (I do, however, draw the line a cat-detective fiction.)
Ultimately it comes down, I think, not to genre definition but to expectation. My expectation was that of being a science fiction novel. As Silverberg explains in an enlightening and entertaining afterward to the recently-reissued Del Rey edition (although I alternated readings with my SF Masterworks copy and even an older mass-market paperback edition depending on where I was reading it - hello my name is John and I'm a biblioholic), the science fiction element could be argued to be the immortality aspect. Maybe so. But sf readers should know that the book is light on what one normally thinks of as sf. It simply reads like mainstream fiction. But a damn fine piece of fiction it is.
(One could also argue that the science of sociology qualifies this as sf. In the afterward, Silverberg admits the classification difficulties with this book. SF fans see it as mainstream but mainstream fans see it as science fiction. Take that, bookshelf stockers!)
(One other note about the afterward: Silverberg mentions how The Book of Skulls was nominated for both the Hugo and a Nebula in the same year, but it lost out to a rather "ordinary" book of "modest value". I couldn't resist. I looked it up. The 1973 Hugo and Nebula Awards went to Isaac Asimov for The Gods Themselves.)
Share:
|
Discussion (0)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Friday March 31, 2006 - 3:29 PM
| Category: Book Review
| © 2006 SF Signal

Share:
|
Discussion (0)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Thursday March 30, 2006 - 7:51 PM
| Category: Tidbits
| © 2006 SF Signal
The Canadian teen who came to be known as The Star Wars Kid is headed to court. He rose to fame because of a video his peers released on the Internet which showed him acting out a light saber scene, and because of all the parodies that followed. Next month he will be appearing in court to pursue a $160,000 lawsuit against his ex-classmates who leaked the video.
[via Club Jade]
Share:
|
Discussion (4)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Wednesday March 29, 2006 - 9:44 PM
| Category: Star Wars
| © 2006 SF Signal
As a companion to the article on the 50th anniversary of Forbidden Planet, the Houston Chronicle also lists The 25 Most Important Science Fiction Films (according to the article's author, Louis B. Parks).
In true meme fashion, I've highlighted the ones I've seen.
THE 25 MOST IMPORTANT SCIENCE FICTION FILMS
Share:
|
Discussion (7)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Wednesday March 29, 2006 - 10:13 AM
| Category: Movies
| © 2006 SF Signal

Share:
|
Discussion (0)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Wednesday March 29, 2006 - 7:02 AM
| Category: Tidbits
| © 2006 SF Signal

John Scalzi's Whatever blog is reporting that publisher Tor has allowed Scalzi and Robert Charles Wilson to make their Hugo-nominated books (Old Man's War and Spin, respectively) available in (DRM-free) electronic format. The catch is that the books are available only to Hugo voters - that is, members of LAcon IV, this year's Worldcon - and only for the duration of the voting period.
Scalzi has the scoop.
Share:
|
Discussion (2)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Tuesday March 28, 2006 - 9:20 AM
| Category: Books
| © 2006 SF Signal

Share:
|
Discussion (3)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Monday March 27, 2006 - 10:32 PM
| Category: Tidbits
| © 2006 SF Signal

Heat Vision and Jack was a pilot for a FOX TV show done in 1999 byt Ben Stiller. It stars Jack Black as an astronaut on the run from NASA and the evil Ron Silver, played by Ron Silver (classic). Heat Vision is Jack's motorcycle and is voiced by Owen Wilson. I guess you could say its a cross between Knight Rider and The Six Million Dollar Man, only funnier. You'll either like it or hate it, depending on your Stiller stomach quotient. It is cheesy and it is dumb, but I think it was created to be a parody, sort of a Police Squad for SF series. Yes, this is real, you can look it up on IMDB.
Share:
|
Discussion (1)
| PermaLink
| Posted by JP on Monday March 27, 2006 - 2:34 PM
| Category: TV
| © 2006 SF Signal

REVIEW SUMMARY: Some hits, some misses.
MY RATING: ![]()
BRIEF SYNOPSIS: Anthology of nine novellas and 1 novelette from the year 2004.
MY REVIEW:
PROS: 8 stories ranging from good to excellent
CONS: 2 stories mediocre or worse.
BOTTOM LINE: A good assortment of stories from 2004.
With several other "Best of..." anthologies on the market, it helps that each one sets its own unique goals. For Jonathan Strahan's Best Short Novels series, available exclusively from the Science Fiction Book Club, the goal is to showcase the best novellas of the previous year in the genres of science fiction and fantasy; Best Short Novels: 2005 collects ten stories published in 2004.
As Strahan notes in the book's introduction, the goal of this series is much the same as Terry Carr's ill-fated The Best Science Fiction Novellas of the Year which had a two volumes run in 1979 and 1980. Fortunately for Strahan, he offers more as he is able to publish twice the number stories with his Best Short Novels series. Here's hoping Strahan has a much longer run; this is a great vehicle for getting quality fiction to the masses. And yes, I say this even after having read stories which did not overwhelm me. Just having the anthology is the prerequisite to reading what some consider the best out there. Just because I may disagree with some of the selections doesn't mean that the series lacks value. On the contrary, I applaud the efforts put forth by the editor and publisher to put these volumes together. I eagerly await diving into the previous year's edition (which waits patiently on my to-read pile) and the upcoming edition dues out later this year.
It's worth noting that Strahan's definition of "novella" is a bit more lenient than the Science Fiction Writers of America's definitions. One of the stories contained in this anthology, Judith Berman's "The Fear Gun", is listed in the Locus Index as a novelette. (For purposes of my Short-Story-a-Day project, which uses the SFWA definitions, I therefore label it as a novelette.)
Overall, I would classify this anthology as being eclectic in its selection. The stories range from classic sf tropes to romantic fantasy - how much more diverse can you get? Some stories even offered different sub-genres within themselves. The varied selection turned out to be a double-edged sword, though, as some readers (like myself) may find a sub-genre that is not to their tastes. (Romantic fantasy? Bah!) On the other hand, you get exposure into these genres with a "cream of the crop" selection that might change your mind.
I had already read four of the stories contained in this volume; three of which I read last year in Gardner Dozois' The Year's Best Science Fiction #22. This is another side effect both fortunate and unfortunate. It's fortunate because it lends weight to the perceived quality of the story when two highly regarded editors choose the same story. It's unfortunate in that the space taken up by those stories could have been used to expose me to more juicy fiction of the unread variety. But that's just a by-product of one's own personal reading habits.
Continuing the trend of newer short fiction, half of the stories contained in this volume are available online. That's good news for those who wish to sample the book's selections. Interestingly, there are not one, but two stories concerning Medusa, the gorgon who can turn men to stone with just one glance. One of those two stories was very good, the other not so much.
Standouts in this anthology are: "Mayflower II" by Stephen Baxter; "Sergeant Chip" by Bradley Denton; and "Shadow Twin" by Gardner Dozois, George R.R. Martin and Daniel Abraham.
Reviewlettes follow.
STORIES IN THIS ANTHOLOGY:
Share:
|
Discussion (0)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Monday March 27, 2006 - 12:10 AM
| Category: Book Review
| © 2006 SF Signal
| (48 total votes) |
Share:
|
Discussion (1)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Monday March 27, 2006 - 12:00 AM
| Category: Polls
| © 2006 SF Signal

Over at Emerald City, author Karen Traviss explains why she writes Star Wars novels. In the article she voices the widespread belief that "media tie-ins are rubbish".
But are they? Do they not require effort just like any other book? According to Karen, they are even more difficult to write because of constraints put on the authors by the controlling party regarding character deaths, their backgrounds, language/terminology and the like. Additionally, the story events need to be congruent with the events in books by many other authors; there's lots of coordination involved.
Speaking for myself, I have historically tended to avoid tie-ins because of this stigma. That's unfortunate for me. I am surely missing out on some perfectly fine sf. For example, some co-bloggers have extolled the virtues of Timothy Zahn's Thrawn trilogy of Star Wars books.
Media tie-ins are not exclusive to the Star Wars universe of course. Star Trek is another popular source of books, as is Stargate, Battlestar Galactica, Doctor Who, Buffy the Vampire Slayer and more. There's even a whole gaming-related set of tie-ins, which I will not even start to get into here.
What do you think? Do you read tie-in novels? Which ones? Or are media tie-in novels trash?
Share:
|
Discussion (12)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Sunday March 26, 2006 - 10:31 PM
| Category: Books
| © 2006 SF Signal
Booksquare points to Publisher's Weekly article "Judging a Book By Its Cover" which tells us that (surprise, surprise) covers matter.
I love science fiction book cover art. Liking any individual artistic style is subject a personal taste. One of my favorite cover artists is the award winning John Picacio who does a lot of cover art for Pyr.
One of the reasons I like physical bookstores over online ones is because cover art is more easily browsed that way. Locus Online does an admirable job showcasing a year's worth of science fiction/fantasy book covers side by side, but rare is the online bookstore that does this and I still want the bigger images without having to use the slower method of the click-through.
According to poll SF Signal did last year, only half of respondents said they purchased a book solely on its cover. That surprises me in that people would base a decision on that alone. Sure covers matter, but I find a bad cover drives me away from a purchase more than a good one will ensure it.
Share:
|
Discussion (0)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Sunday March 26, 2006 - 11:07 AM
| Category: Books
| © 2006 SF Signal
I stumbled across an sf-related NPR link and thought it might be time to follow up last year's post Genre Stuff on NPR.
Share:
|
Discussion (0)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Saturday March 25, 2006 - 12:01 AM
| Category: Web Sites
| © 2006 SF Signal

Share:
|
Discussion (0)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Friday March 24, 2006 - 3:48 PM
| Category: Tidbits
| © 2006 SF Signal

REVIEW SUMMARY: A novel that's thought-provoking, literary and entertaining despite a slow start.
MY RATING: ![]()
BRIEF SYNOPSIS: The story of several characters during a time of political and environmental change in a futuristic 21st century India.
MY REVIEW:
PROS: Cool technology; Indian culture creates excellent atmosphere; engrossing storylines; well-crafted.
CONS: Slow start; incomplete glossary.
BOTTOM LINE: A hugely enjoyable book on any number of levels.
The futuristic India in Ian McDonald's River of Gods would be marvelous enough with its technological society, one where the sentience of artificial intelligence is limited by a law called the Hamilton Acts; where illegal software houses circumvent the law; where a government agency known as The Ministry "excommunicates" rogue AIs from this world; where virtual reality is the order of the day; where popular soap operas feature computer-generated characters played by computer-generated actors; where advanced medical procedures can turn you into a genderless "nute" or genetic engineering can give you a disease free, slow-aging Brahmin child; where power is generated underneath sidewalks that harness the energy of footsteps ; where even greater amounts of energy can be realized from the potential difference between two universes that exist at different ground states; and where an alien artifact is found in space that holds untold mysteries.
But River of Gods goes one step further, adding a whole other layer of enjoyment in the process, through the portrayal of Indian culture. It permeates everyone and everything, bringing forth interesting concepts and vivid imagery that give it a distinct mood and flavor. India's caste system remains but now includes the Brahmin, a group of people genetically-bred to be disease free, whose long life gives them an extended period of youthful appearance. The culture's many Gods are also prevalent in the story. For the culturally-uninitiated (like myself) there is a handy glossary included that defines many Hindi terms. However, the novel is so steeped in culture (and wonderfully so) that the glossary is woefully incomplete. Many of the words this Average Westerner looked up were not included. Eventually, I stopped using it. Needless to say, those who know Indian culture and especially Hindi will find a whole other level of enjoyment that escaped me, as evidenced by the light bulbs that went on when I asked a Hindi-speaking friend to translate words and section titles.
Even so, what is left behind was immensely entertaining. The story follows several characters through a time of political and environmental change in India. A years-long drought has pushed the region of Bharat towards war with neighboring Awadh. The Prime Minister's secretary, Shaheen Badoor Khan, is pivotal in maintaining victory for Bharat while trying to simultaneously neutralize the impending government takeover by the people's prophet, N.K. Jivanjee. Unfortunately for Khan, he has a "perverse" predilection for nutes, social outcasts because they are different by choice. One nute, Tal, is a set designer on the nationwide soap opera sensation Town & Country, where CGI characters are played by CGI actors. Reporter Najia Askarzada gets to interview the soap's low-level AI stars but eventually becomes embroiled in national conspiracy.
Meanwhile, Mr. Nandha is a Krishna Cop with the Ministry, sworn to eliminate any AIs that rise to a certain level of intelligence while utilizing his own AIs (named after Gods) to capture the rogues. Deeply involved in his work, Nandha fails to realize his wife Parvati forms a questionable relationship with her gardener.
Vishram Ray, formerly a failing comedian, is bequeathed a part of his father's lucrative power company. Their research and development division has found a way to harness energy from other universes using different ground state energy levels to generate power with no cost.
Thomas Lull is a dropout from society, but his past skills are needed by scientist Lisa Durnau as she is enlisted by NASA to explore the strange alien artifact known as the Tabernacle. The Tabernacle is located at the heart of an asteroid that suspiciously keeps missing a collision with Earth. Lull and Lisa meet up with the mysterious Aj, another mystery as she shows signs of having paranormal powers.
Lastly, there's Shiv; a street thug and murderer who, driven by debt and fear of loan-shark-controlled robotic debt collectors, is being manipulated by powers far beyond his understanding.
These many plotlines are kept separate for a large part of the book's beginning, something I found to be somewhat disconcerting as I wondered how story lines would intersect. What can I say? I'm an impatient reader. When they did start intersecting, that bewilderment disappeared. It paid off being persistent as McDonald manages to not only successfully juggle these storylines, but does so in a way that keeps you immersed within them.
The language of the novel is beautifully crafted and is infused with symbolism, mostly by way of the Gods. There is also a healthy dose of thought-provoking ideas in the areas of sentience, reality and what it means to be human. The Singularity, a currently popular sf theme which is in danger of showing its age in the genre, also makes an appearance. River of Gods deftly circumvents the overexposure issue by not concentrating on life after the Singularity so much as the way we might get there. (Sorry, can't say more without spoilers.) Suffice it to say that the book holds many, many wonders. And, dare I say, between the writing style and the layers of story construction, the book gives the impression of being what one might call a "Literary" novel.
When River of Gods was released last year in the UK, it received much notice. It was the winner of the 2005 British Science Fiction Association Awards and nominated for the 2005 Hugo, Clarke and Locus awards. I went in with some trepidation at the prospect of not liking yet another acclaimed book. I needn't have worried. River of Gods is a hugely enjoyable book on any number of levels.
Share:
|
Discussion (7)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Friday March 24, 2006 - 2:22 AM
| Category: Book Review
| © 2006 SF Signal

Share:
|
Discussion (1)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Thursday March 23, 2006 - 3:51 PM
| Category: Tidbits
| © 2006 SF Signal

Kathryn Cramer shows off the covers of some nifty-sounding anthologies that she and hubby David G. Hartwell have edited.
The first, due in April 2006, is The Science Fiction Century, Volume One (edited by Harwell alone) and looks to be a trade paperback booksplit reprint or Hartwell's 1997 The Science Fiction Century. In true biblioholic fashion, I've yet to read that one even though I bought it years ago.
The second is the Tor book The Space Opera Renaissance and it's due out in July 2006. Here's the book description:
"Space opera", once a derisive term for cheap pulp adventure, has come to mean something more in modern SF: compelling adventure stories told against a broad canvas, and written to the highest level of skill. Indeed, it can be argued that the "new space opera" is one of the defining streams of modern SF.Mmmmm...crunchy sf goodness...[Homer gurgle]Now, World Fantasy Award-winning anthologists David G. Hartwell and Kathryn Cramer have compiled a definitive overview of this subgenre, both as it was in the days of the pulp magazines, and as it has become in 2005. Included are major works from genre progenitors like Jack Williamson and Leigh Brackett, stylish midcentury voices like Cordwainer Smith and Samuel R. Delany, popular favorites like David Drake, Lois McMaster Bujold, and Ursula K. Le Guin, and modern-day pioneers such as Iain M. Banks, Steven Baxter, Scott Westerfeld, and Charles Stross.
Share:
|
Discussion (1)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Thursday March 23, 2006 - 2:00 PM
| Category: Books
| © 2006 SF Signal
Entertainment Weekly has identified 25 of the Worst Movie Sequels Ever Made. There are more than a few sci-fi, fantasy and horror movies that made the list.