DATE ARCHIVE: September 2006

Following up his recent "Beer-Money SF vs. Literary SF" post - and Velcro City's thoughtful response - Andrew Wheeler has posted "Beer-Money SF Redux". In it, he tries to pin down why science fiction is in, and will most likely remain in, a literary ghetto.

My general theory here is that most readers are primarily interested in books that are described in words they already understand. There will be exceptions, but, for most people, being told that a book is about something incomprehensible (in a more convoluted way than that) will not be a point in its favor. If someone tells me that some great novel is about the inevitability of frammis, and that it distims the doshes in a way no gostak can, I'm probably not going to be interested. If the same person tells me it's a great new First Contact book with a neat new idea about picotech and a different take on "The Cold Equations," then I'll probably look for that book. You have to have some handle on why you might like a book before you can even decide you want it.
In a similar vein comes thos article from the satirical site The Toque, "Science Fiction and Fantasy Don't Mix".
Those science fiction fans were one weird crowd. Everything needed an explanation. Space ships had to have a logical means of propulsion, and there always needed to be schematic drawings. Strange new worlds had to be described in great detail, right down to the composition of the atmosphere. And the physics of time travel always had to be explained. Nothing was ever accepted as is. There was certainly no room for staff-carrying magicians with long flowing robes.

Brian, on the other hand, read fantasy fiction--sensible magical stories about dungeons & dragons, swords & sorcery, elves, goblins, and trolls. With fantasy the impossible was plausible, and worlds could be saved with the wave of a crystal-wearing hand. Science never interfered.

Brian didn't need rational explanations for unexplained phenomena; he read for pleasure and a simple "it's magic" was just fine by him. Anyways, it was all about the "quest". But for some reason, the sci-fi reader had some obsessive need to rationalize. He needed to know how hyperspace works, and why a pulse rifle is able to both stun and kill.

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (2) | PermaLink | Category: Books
Posted by John DeNardo at Saturday September 30, 2006 at 9:30 PM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (4) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Saturday September 30, 2006 at 12:48 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

The SciFI Channel aired the first two episodes of Doctor Who series two tonight. I like the show. It has a nice mix of adult "nudge-nudge, wink-wink" humor and good ol' fashioned camp, which the kids seem to like. The new Doctor seems to be good fit. (And I still think he has a bit of a Davy Jones thing going on.)

As per usual, I watched with my daughter, who loves it. On one of the episodes, one of the characters loses a hand in a swordfight, to which my apparently geek-in-training daughter replied, "That's just like Star Wars. I think the people that made this saw Star Wars."

Could I be more proud? I think not. :)

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (4) | PermaLink | Category: TV
Posted by John DeNardo at Saturday September 30, 2006 at 12:17 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Genre pulp writer Emerson LaSalle is not a fan of science. Or, at least, according to his blog Count Pulpula, he's not happy with How Science Ruined Science Fiction.

The biggest problem with science is that it eventually undermines sci-fi staples. Take Mars for example. Thanks to that useless tax drain NASA, we now know Mars to be a lifeless rock which may or may not have had water on it at one time. Gee, thanks, science.
While it's true that many science fiction novels have been shown to scientifically false in restrospect, I still find classic sf quite appealing. I find it interesting to see how yesteryear's visionaries envisioned the world we see today.

But I gotta wonder about the Mars comment. Has the recent Mars exploration doomed the Mars story? Has science really ruined sf?

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (11) | PermaLink | Category: Books
Posted by John DeNardo at Friday September 29, 2006 at 1:22 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Friday September 29, 2006 at 1:05 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

The familiar crew of the Enterprise face another certain doom scenario.

Fortunately, five members can transport to the planet below.


[also via Milk and Cookies]

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: TV
Posted by John DeNardo at Thursday September 28, 2006 at 2:48 PM
© 2006 SF Signal


More in the category of 'sci-fi coming to life' is a Philips technology that allows for true fiber optics - in this case, fabric fibers. The technology called Lumalive puts an array of LEDs into the fabric itself and thus allowing you to have moving graphical images presented from your clothing. I can only imagine the potential uses for such technology - jackets for use while jogging at night that warn vehicles of your location, shirts that allow you to promote the latest craze (your favorite blog maybe), and underwear that ... well ... perhaps that's best left to the imagination.

Can the world envisioned by the movie Blade Runner be that far away?

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (2) | PermaLink | Category: Science and Technology
Posted by Scott Shaffer at Thursday September 28, 2006 at 8:44 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Thursday September 28, 2006 at 12:41 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

From 2002 P.B. (Pre-Blog), there's a Washington Post article in which authors name some favorite books. The short version:

  • Michael Chabon: R Is for Rocket by Ray Bradbury.
  • Thomas M. Disch: Melmoth the Wanderer by Charles Maturin.
  • Neil Gaiman: Nine Hundred Grandmothers by R.A. Lafferty.
  • Ellen Datlow: Dangerous Visions edited by Harlan Ellison and The Playboy Book of Horror and the Supernatural.
  • James Hynes: Chronopolis and Other Stories by J.G. Ballard.
  • Sheila Williams: What Mad Universe by Fredric Brown.
  • Daniel Handler (aka Lemony Snicket): Weird Women, Wired Women by Kit Reed.
  • Peter Straub: The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson.
  • Terry Pratchett: The Evolution Man by Roy Lewis.
  • Nancy Kress: The Dispossessed and The Left Hand of Darkness by Ursula K. Le Guin.
  • John Clute: Her Smoke Rose Up Forever by James Tiptree Jr.
  • Gordon van Gelder: In Signs of Life, Course of the Heart by M. John Harrison.
  • Daniel Pinkwater: Mount Analogue by René Daumal.
  • Diana Wynne Jones: Sing the Four Quarters by Tanya Huff.
  • Poppy Z. Brite: Love Ain't Nothing But Sex Misspelled by Harlan Ellison.
  • Kelly Link: The Wolves of WilloughbyChase by Joan Aiken.
  • John Crowley: The Priest by Thomas M. Disch and Being Dead by Jim Crace.

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (3) | PermaLink | Category: Books
Posted by John DeNardo at Wednesday September 27, 2006 at 1:20 PM
© 2006 SF Signal

REVIEW SUMMARY: It's important to be able to relate to the main character in a character-driven novel.

MY RATING:

BRIEF SYNOPSIS: Military android goes AWOL and tries to live a normal life among the enemy.

MY REVIEW:
PROS: Well-written action scenes; avoids "robot wants to be human" cliché.
CONS: Little reason to care about main character; poor pacing; somewhat mired down in politics.
BOTTOM LINE: Shows signs of being a first novel.

Read more...

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Book Review
Posted by John DeNardo at Wednesday September 27, 2006 at 7:13 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

UPDATED: WIth link to EW BG Story.

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (6) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Wednesday September 27, 2006 at 7:12 AM
© 2006 SF Signal


Not to be confused with robots on TV or in the movies, these robots are real. John Deere has instigated a research program designing fully unmanned robotic farm tractors. And by tractor, I don't mean the tiny 4-cylinder device you might use around the house. In this case, I'm talking about about the big farm tractors that roam the acres of commercial farmland in middle-America.

Completely automatic driving systems already exist - and in fact are already being used today. But today the operator has to hang out in the cab ready to control the more esoteric aspects of farming. A farmer today can start up his tractor and get in some reading (sci-fi no doubt) while the computer in the cab drives whatever machine he's got to either sow or reap. And the systems can automatically switch between crops depending on what field you're on - doing the right thing for soybeans and a different thing for corn. Again, while the driver barely has to look up. The researcher at Deere are unashamed of promoting the fact that eventually they will get the farmer out of the silo entirely. Luckily I don't fear a War Games scenario with this like I might with missile launch systems.

Second, at the recent Big Iron farm show in North Dakota, total-farm WiFi systems were pitched. Not designed to allow the farmer surf the web, but instead being utilized for remotely operated watering, feeding, and other systems used today on a farm.

Eventually our farmers will merely sit down at the operations center inside their massive farmhouse and direct the operation of the farm, much like a power planet operator or network administrator does today.

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Science and Technology
Posted by Scott Shaffer at Tuesday September 26, 2006 at 6:30 PM
© 2006 SF Signal

It's that time again boys and girls, time for another, patented, SF Signal Reader Challenge! This time, the challenge will be broken into two separate challenges, with associated polls (although John doesn't know that yet, though, it will make the next few polls easy for him...). This time, I'm looking for your coolest/favorite science fiction setting in the written form. The rules:

  1. List up to 3 settings in the comments below.
  2. Please restrict your settings to those in written form. In this case, novels, novellas, novelettes, short stories, poems and the like, in short, anything published in writing. Screenplays do not count.
  3. For those settings that have cross-pollinated between the visual and written media, only those settings whose original story was in written form should be considered and listed. For instance, the film 2001 won't be accepted, but the short story "The Sentinel" will be. Star Wars and Star Trek are right out, this time.

I'll collate the answers, then we may have a poll to see which setting is the coolest or the most favorite of the SF Signal readers. I'll run this challenge through this coming Sunday (10/1) and then make John put up a poll starting next Monday, and then another challenge covering the visual media.

My coolest settings? Glad you asked:

  • The Culture from the mind of Iain (The M Stands for SF) M. Banks. Eccentric, overprotective AIs, ginormous ships, immortality (if careful), and Special Circumstances. What's not to like?
  • Alastair Reynold's Revelation Space universe. Sure, FTL is more trouble than its worth, but the society mankind has made is really cool.
  • David Brin's Uplift series. Just plain cool. If only he'd finish the story of the Streaker.

Now it's your turn!

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (25) | PermaLink | Category: Books
Posted by JP Frantz at Tuesday September 26, 2006 at 3:20 PM
© 2006 SF Signal

The blogosphere is a-buzz with the good stuff being posted at Meme Therapy, and with good reason. Their interviews and Brain Parades are attracting some big names in science and science fiction.

SF Signal had the opportunity to turn the meme-tables on the good folks at Meme Therapy, putting them under the microscope like they've done to so many others...

  Jose Rosie Charlie
Mug Shot
First sf book you read Splinter of the Mind's Eye by Alan Dean Foster. Oh God, can't remember. Probably either one of Asimov's Foundation novels or something by Robert A. Heinlein. My mother's a sci-fi nut so I was exposed at a very young age. Not sure, but it could well have been Dolphin Island by Clarke when I was about 8 or 9 - I remember being captivated by the giant hovercraft he depicted roaring across land and sea, and by the tropical techno-idyll eventually reached by the young stowaway protagonist. Not sure I'd enjoy it quite as much if I re-read it now, though ;-)
Last sf book you read. Cyrptonomicon by Neal Stephenson. The Diamond Age by Neal Stephenson. The last one I finished was Infoquake, I'm currently reading Brass Man.
Favorite sf book. I'm going to wimp out and go with my sentimental favourite A World Out of Time by Larry Niven. I'm going to cheat and say Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars Trilogy, rather than giving any single book. The character development is just amazing and the science fantastic. I'm hopeless at picking favourites, but off the top of my head, Ringworld and Red Mars would have to be up there (sorry for cheating). I love tales of exploration.
Favorite sci-fi author (living) Larry Niven. Apart from KSR, Neal Stephenson for Cryptonomicon and The Baroque Cycle. Even though they're set in the past they're still science fiction. Argh...Well, if you base it on how far in advance I pre-order their books, I guess it would have to be Iain M. Banks, but really, there are far too many brilliant and varied writers out there (to choose just one, I mean...), and I have to register a protest at the meanness of only allowing one pick.
Favorite sci-fi author (dead) Gotta be Heinlein. Heinlein for being impossible to pin down and for annoying just about every sector of American society in his career. Hmm...for some reason this is easier, and I find myself having to choose between Wells and Verne...and it's got to be Wells, really, hasn't it.
Hard SF or space opera? Another tough call. Hard SF. Depends on my mood, I tend to go for hard sci-fi more though. Hard SF.
Military sf or cyberpunk? Cyberpunk. Cyberpunk as I tend to find most military sci-fi incredibly tedious and uninventive. If I see one more WWII/Vietnam/Trafalgar-in-space novel I'll scream. Cyberpunk, I guess, though I'm not sure the boundary between the two is that clear cut. And I will admit to a (probably) unhealthy fascination with weapon systems through the ages.
Favorite sci-fi movie 2001: A Space Odyssey. Knowing Rosie can't stand it makes me love it even more. Bladerunner for the style, Gattaca for the acting, plot and gnarly politics, Starship Troopers for the satire. Tough one. I have never seen a sci-fi movie which inspired the same sense of wonder in me as the best literature. I was going to go for an intellectual choice like 2001, but if I force myself to be honest, probably Star Wars. It may not have the science part right, but it has that strange depth of field that makes it compelling and makes you wonder about what might be going on just out of sight of the camera.
Zombie fight: Night of the Living Dead vs. 28 Days Later - who would win? I'm rooting for the British vampires. All those years of living in a poor climate make them extra surly in unlife. 28 Days Later. Hey I'm British. Neither. Shaun of the Dead would have them both.
BG or Doctor Who? It feels like a betrayal to say this but BG. Battlestar Galactica any day. It's the only overtly political show on American T.V. and the space battles are cool. Erm...I'm on thin ice here, as I don't really watch that much TV, so I haven't seen more than a couple of episodes of either. On the balance (and possibly because of ethnic bias) I'd have to go for the good Doctor, though.
Favorite sci-fi TV show (current) Battlestar Galacti ca. Hated the original ironically. Battlestar Galactica. See above, if I say any more I'll just reveal the depth of my ignorance.
Favorite sci-fi TV show (canceled) Firefly. Firefly. There's just never been anything else like it. (Although for traditional space opera I have to say I have a penchant for Babylon 5.) I'm not sure it's really the answer you're looking for, but The Future's Wild was wonderful. I have been a fan of Dougal Dixon's wonderful imaginings of evolutionary potential since reading After Man: A Zoology of the Future, and I just wish they'd make more stuff like this.
Boomer, Six or the Bionic Woman? I had a crush on the Bionic Woman growing up but now it's definitely Boomer. I don't get the guys who wear "Six of Mine" T-shirts. Boomer. Oh bloody hell, I don't know...Six, purely because I prefer the unknown and I have no idea who she (hopefully) is.
Harlan Ellison or a punch in your gob? I'm not a member of the Stone Harlan movement so I pick Harlan. Since I think "I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream" is possibly the best sci-fi short story ever I'd have to go for Harlan Ellison. Harlan Ellison punching me in the gob.
Occupation outside the blog Headset Whore. But I blog at work so I consider myself a covertly pro blogger. Politics student and professional grumpy bastard. I work for a game testing company. It's not as interesting/fun as you might think.
Celebrity you most resemble Chewbacca. It's a toss up between Jesus and Che Guevera. A mutant hybrid of Oscar Wilde and Hunter S. Thompson.
Favorite Meme Therapy post. It's still our third post. The Unmanned vs Manned Spaceflight Brain Parade. Ooh, there's so many. To be honest I really don't have a favourite. The first one, where I conclusively prove that heading out into space is essential to the psycho-socio-spiritual welfare of our species, naturally.
Favorite scientist Spock. Richard Dawkins for being utterly uncompromising in his defence of evolution and criticism of religion. Freeman Dyson.
Favorite website Rudy Rucker's Blog. The Guardian Unlimited. The Guardian's the only newspaper which actually seems to get the internet and is prepared to adapt itself and use tools such as blogging and podcasting to present its stories. Aww, c'mon, man...no comment ;-)
Favorite superhero Matter-Eater Lad. I've never really been into comics that much but I guess it'd have to be Batman. Judge Dredd.
If you could have one of Superman's powers, what would it be? His incomprehensible staying power. The ability to fly. Then I wouldn't have to catch the bus to work every morning. The power of flight, of course...
The biggest disappointment in sf That I can't use it to pick up women. Apart from Firefly being cancelled? The lack of really good and incisive social commentary in American sci-fi at present. Come on guys, your Nation's in the midst of an existential crisis, write about it! That no one has yet made a film of Rama. Or The Mote in God's Eye. Or any of the other brilliant books and short stories I read when I was growing up.
Science fiction personality you most admire I don't know much about Science Fiction authors on a personal basis but from what little I've seen I really like Joe Haldeman. I'd like to get drunk with the man. Stanislaw Lem (although he's dead now). Way smarter than any other sci-fi writer I've ever read. If by admire you mean "would most like to meet", I guess Larry Niven.

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (4) | PermaLink | Category: Interviews
Posted by John DeNardo at Tuesday September 26, 2006 at 12:04 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Tuesday September 26, 2006 at 12:00 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Author John M. Ford has passed away.

See the Making Light blog for more info and related links...

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Books
Posted by John DeNardo at Monday September 25, 2006 at 11:22 PM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (3) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Monday September 25, 2006 at 12:29 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Here are the results of the latest SF Signal poll.

QUESTION
Which of these is your favorite fictional robot from film?

RESULTS
(69 total votes)
I would have thought that the people would be all over the metallic T-1000. It seems that there is a fondness for the classic robots of the 50's. But they still didn't edge out those pesky replicants!



Be sure to vote in this week's poll about online book reviews!

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (6) | PermaLink | Category: Polls
Posted by John DeNardo at Monday September 25, 2006 at 12:00 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Cory Doctorow has completed the 4-part podcast of his Nebula-nominated short story "0wnz0red".

Here are links to the MP3s:

Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Books
Posted by John DeNardo at Sunday September 24, 2006 at 10:53 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (1) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Sunday September 24, 2006 at 12:55 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

The Paris Review has posted a bunch of their past interviews with authors as part of The DNA of Literature. (Sadly, some are only interview excerpts, but some have the full interview in PDF format.) A few of these authors have been known to dabble in science fiction, despite what some of them may say. [Looks at Atwood and Vonnegut.] Here are the ones of note for genre fans:

[via Backwards City]

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Books
Posted by John DeNardo at Saturday September 23, 2006 at 5:24 PM
© 2006 SF Signal

Stefan from the Yahoo group Beyond Reality writes in to tell us about the recent happenings in the group. Beyond Reality, with 450+ members, discusses one science fiction and one fantasy book throughout the month. Recently, they have extended invitations to authors who have accepted and will appear in upcoming group discussions as noted below. If you've ever wondered what it would be like to participate in a book club, this would be a good opportunity.

Here's their schedule:

September

  • SF: Artifact by Gregory Benford
  • Fantasy: City of Saints and Madmen by Jeff Vandermeer
October
  • SF: Earth by David Brin (who will participate)
  • Fantasy: Unbinding the Stone by Marc Vun Kannon
November
  • SF: Spin by Robert Charles Wilson (who will participate)
  • Fantasy: The Dragonbone Chair by Tad Williams

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (2) | PermaLink | Category: Web Sites
Posted by John DeNardo at Saturday September 23, 2006 at 4:58 PM
© 2006 SF Signal

Following on the heels of the recent Book Review Backlash, it seems that the realm of the argument has breached the blogosphere and (somewhat) entered the mainstream. I'm referring to to a recent Time magazine essay by book critic Lev Grossman called My Mortal Enemy, in which Lev talks back to blogger Edward Champion who apparently has been vocal about disliking Lev's reviews. Says Lev:

I want to be clear: I don't think Ed Champion is an idiot. I've read some of the other, non--Lev Grossman-related posts on his blog (which is mostly about books), and have found them to be highly opinionated but otherwise cogent and well-informed, and sometimes even charming. Ed Champion is not insane. He's just unswervingly committed to the position that I am a complete tool.

I know, I know, I should toughen up. Blogging is a knockabout sport, and as a writer I'm fair game. You'd think I could just ignore Ed Champion (you can find him at edrants.com yeah, go ahead, don't all click at once) and most of the time I do. But it's harder than you'd think. Blogs reach a big audience. People read him. People link to him. Google frickin' loves Ed. Not long ago I set up a website of my own, and despite the fact that it's my website, and it deals with nothing but Lev Grossman, and it's located at levgrossman.com Ed's website still comes up ahead of mine half the time.

It's nice to see a magazine acknowledging the blogosphere, but for Lev, his life is "increasingly being invaded by these people". Lev's position on blogging:
It's one of the singular features of our little social-technological moment that people all over the world whom we otherwise would never even be aware of can effortlessly impinge upon our minds and lives and desktops. We probably see fewer people in person these days, but our lives are populated by an entire chorus of disembodied presences, amplified and directed by the Internet, as if we had all begun to suffer from a mild form of schizophrenia. Everybody talks a little louder now. There's a little less mental elbow room.
Getting back to book reviews, Lev said this week in a Critical Mass interview:
At the risk -- nay, certainty -- of sounding kind of snobbish, I wish book sections in general would leave book-reviewing to the pros. There's a pervasive notion that anybody who can read can write a book review. Not so. Good god, there is nothing so boring, so dank and unappealing on the page, as a bad book review.

And at the risk of sounding reverse-snobbish, I'd like to see more serious review attention go to genre fiction. It is, after all, what most people read. The worst of it is very bad, and the best of it is very very good. Why not help potential book-buyers divide the one from 'tother?

For further reading: Bud Parr at Chekov's Mistress has a well-thought-out response to amateur reviews. (Also cross-posted at MetaxuCafé.)

[via Niall at Big Blog of Cheese]

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (3) | PermaLink | Category: Books
Posted by John DeNardo at Saturday September 23, 2006 at 4:45 PM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Friday September 22, 2006 at 12:29 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

The Forgotten Trek website is "a tribute to those forgotten heroes who created Star Trek - from the Enterprise herself to the uniforms worn by its crew. This is a shrine to the men and woman who made Star Trek possible and took good care of it for decades..."

There's lots of good information here for fans, both diehard and casual: concept art, behind-the-scenes info, costumes, lost voyages (unused material) and interviews with the production crew.

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Web Sites
Posted by John DeNardo at Thursday September 21, 2006 at 1:00 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Thursday September 21, 2006 at 12:56 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Don Swaim, host of the long-running CBS Radio show, Book Beat, has interviewed a butt-load of authors. Many of these uncut interviews are available online. Check out these interviews of genre authors:

I'm in the middle of listening to the Asimov interview as I type this. He's talking about the history the sf field and his career and books. (He was scared of writing another Foundation novel years after having written the "last" one.) It's really fascinating stuff. Check it out!

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Books, Web Sites
Posted by John DeNardo at Thursday September 21, 2006 at 12:44 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Following a recent tidbit about J.R.R. Tolkien reading and singing his Lord Of The Rings, the good folks at SFF Audio have found some other sf goodies that were born on vinyl.

First, Arthur C. Clarke reads his short stories "Transit Of Earth", "The Star" and "The Nine Billion Names of God".

Next, Aldous Huxley's Brave New World is performed by Aldous Huxley and a full cast in two parts.

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Books
Posted by John DeNardo at Thursday September 21, 2006 at 12:15 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Wednesday September 20, 2006 at 10:11 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Curse you, late night blogging!

Sorry folks, I inadvertently posted an erroneous news item about the passing of James Earl Jones, when it was Robert Earl Jones (James's father) who passed away. Although the post has been deleted, some of you will undoubtedly see it in our newsfeeds. I sincerely apologize. You now have confirmation that I am indeed a big boob with a blog. Rest assured I will be the subject of ridicule for weeks, if not years, to come. And with good reason. (See aforementioned note on boobishness.)

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (8) | PermaLink | Category: Meta
Posted by John DeNardo at Tuesday September 19, 2006 at 1:52 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (1) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Tuesday September 19, 2006 at 1:08 AM
© 2006 SF Signal


MY RATING:

BRIEF SYNOPSIS: An anthology of 32 stories attempting to provide historical perspective of space opera.

MY REVIEW:
PROS: 24 stories good or better, 10 of them outstanding; historical editorials.
CONS: 8 stories mediocre or worse; editorials have academic tone.
BOTTOM LINE: You are unlikely to find a more comprehensive survey of space opera.

It takes a certain ambition to try to get your editorial arms around space opera because it seems that everyone has their own definition of it. It's as if the definition of it is as subjective a thing as success or beauty. It therefore may not be surprising that a space opera anthology, which attempts to put space opera in historical perspective by including samples from all its variations, is just freakin' huge. At 32 stories (12 novellas, 12 novelettes, 7 short stories and 1 vignette) and 940+ pages, The Space Opera Renaissance is one giant, arm-numbing tome. When you open the cover and see that the book is printed with smaller than normal text, it may seem downright daunting. But if space opera is your thing, like it is mine, you'll dive into it with laser blaster drawn.

So how does a reader get his arms around this? The book's table of contents shows its organization. Stories are grouped into sections roughly by era, yet inexplicably the publication dates of the stories within each section do not always fall within those dates. This must be an editorial oversight. It would have been better to leave off the year labels on the section headings to avoid the confusion.

Hartwell's and Cramer's introduction - an expansion of an earlier essay titled How Shit Became Shinola: Definition and Redefinition of Space Opera - serves to put space opera in historical perspective by considering the myriad of definitions it has held over the years. It's not all laser blasters and spaceships. Along with story intros that are longer than those in most anthologies, the main introduction has a somewhat academic tone that makes it seem like a stiffly-delivered dissertation. Space opera is supposed to fun. Writing about it should yield something fun as well. Otherwise, the essay does great job cataloguing the history of space opera, from its critical abusive roots to its morphing into something acceptable by the literati.

Since the definition of space opera is so broad, it's no wonder that some of the stories seem to be all over the sf genre map. Several stories seem more happily pigeonholed to other sub-genres (like military sf, for example) than they do in the space opera camp, but only diehard space opera purists would be bothered by this. The result of the genre-mingling is a diverse mix of stories that either hint at or have feet firmly entrenched in whatever your own personal definition of space opera might be. As to the quality of the stories, well, that varies. It seems that some stories were chosen to make the volume more comprehensive. That's the point of this volume, I suppose. But how many anthologies can boast having only top-notch stories anyway? The book succeeds in its goal of providing a comprehensive survey of space opera.

There were ten standout stories this volume. They were "The Star-Stealers" by Edmond Hamilton, "The Swordsmen of Varnis" by Clive Jackson, "Empire Star" by Samuel R. Delany, "A Gift from the Culture" by Iain M. Banks, "Escape Route" by Peter F. Hamilton, "Aurora in Four Voices" by Catherine Asaro, "The Death of Captain Future" by Allen Steele, "Fools Errand" by Sarah Zettel, "Spirey and the Queen" by Alastair Reynolds and "Guest Law" by John C. Wright. Six of the stories are available online, as noted by the hyperlinked story names below.

[Note: It's rare for any anthology, but certainly possible in one of this size, to include a story that qualifies as a novel by the SFWA standards, but Donald Kingsbury's Kzin story "The Survivor" clocks in at 60,000 words according to the author's website. When published as part of The Man-Kzin Wars IV, it was 245 pages. For that reason, I will not include it in my short story reading project but since it does contribute to the overall quality of The Space Opera Renaissance, I have weighted "The Survivor" rating as twice that of a novella.]

Reviewlettes follow.

Read more...

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (6) | PermaLink | Category: Book Review
Posted by John DeNardo at Monday September 18, 2006 at 12:31 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Here are the results of the latest SF Signal poll.

QUESTION
Have you ever, by your own choice, finished reading a book you were not enjoying?

RESULTS
(61 total votes)


Be sure to vote in this week's poll on your favorite film robot!

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Polls
Posted by John DeNardo at Monday September 18, 2006 at 12:00 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

There are a couple of discussions going on in the sf blogosphere regarding book reviews. Here are my thoughts on the matter...

REVIEWS & CRITIQUES
In a rather lengthy post that mixes review with anti-review rant, Gabe Chouinard says he's disappointed with the quality of online reviews. He says he wants substance in the reviews he reads.

There are some interesting comments and observations in that post and a healthy dose of angry comments, too. Much of the discussion revolves around the difference between a review and a critique. One commenter took issue with Gabe's rant, enough to post a scathing counterpoint on his own Live Journal to which Gabe responded. Also good reading, that. Despite the occasional angry comments, it's good that people are talking about this.

I'm reminded of people who gripe yet continue to punish themselves by continuing the behavior which seems to make them so unhappy. (I'll ignore the ironic amusement provided by Gabe's admission that he is part of the problem.) If a reviewer is not to your liking for whatever reason - lack of insight, differing tastes, poor writing - then don't read their reviews. If you have a list of reviewers who you like, great! Stick with them.

As one of the offending reviewers, I'm tempted, as was apparently intended, to respond defensively. I could pick on the fact that the more "insightful" of my comments of my review was ignored and a quote was chosen (one with a typo no less) to suit the rant. I could also mention how Eragon was a book I purchased and not a review copy from the publisher, thus there was no aim to please anyone. I could say that the review was written relatively soon after I began reviewing and that my later (and hopefully more experienced) reviews were ignored. I could cite how my reviews are not always glowing, how I don't like everything I see and that sometimes ticks people off. (Don't get me started by mentioning Klausner.)

But the fact is that people review and critique for all sorts of reasons. Some do it as a profession. Some, like me, do it for recording their impressions. Some, as the other post suspects, might even do it for the free books. Without matching each and every individual review with a reviewer's reasons and criteria, whining about them seems pointless. The most you can (respectfully) say is that your tastes differ from a reviewer and/or a review does meet your own expectations, which may be entirely different than the goals of the reviewer.

That said, there are review sites that I personally feel do not meet my own expectations. But you can't please everyone. I'm sure those same reviews are useful to someone somewhere. To each his own.


SHORT STORY REVIEWS
Over on the Nightshade forum, there's a discussion about short story reviews. The discussion revolves around whether a review of a collection or anthology should say something about every single story in the book.

Are reviewers obligated to do so? Some of that post's commenters seem to think so. They feel cheated if stories are not mentioned. But, as mentioned there, some venues are limited for space (especially print magazines) and there are only so many words that can be used. Editorial constraints apply.

Speaking for myself, which is the only thing I can do, I like to review all of the stories. Again, this suits my reason for reviewing: to serve as a record and reminder of what I've read. Admittedly, I'm probably more anal-retentive about it than most, as will be evidenced by my upcoming review of The Space Opera Renaissance. But that's just what I choose to do. Your mileage may vary between reviewers, venues and subject matter.

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (16) | PermaLink | Category: Books
Posted by John DeNardo at Sunday September 17, 2006 at 3:18 PM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (1) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Sunday September 17, 2006 at 1:46 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (1) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Saturday September 16, 2006 at 1:01 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

The Science Fiction Book Club blog has posted a series of excerpts from the SFBC monthly member magazine in which authors talk about their books. Most recently:

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Books
Posted by John DeNardo at Friday September 15, 2006 at 1:08 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

[subtitle: Where Tim Will Be on Sept. 18 :)]

From scifi.com:

Grace Park, who plays Sharon "Boomer" Valerii on SCI FI Channel's original series Battlestar Galactica, will answer viewer questions in a video interview that will go live on SCIFI.COM on Sept. 18.

Park will discuss the show, the challenges and benefits of playing multiple characters and the possibility of a Battlestar Galactica hockey team.

Park answered questions that were previously submitted by visitors to SCIFI.COM. The video will go live at 7:30 p.m. ET on SCIFI.COM's SCI FI Pulse broadband network.

(Note to self: Make sure The Wife is not nearby when googling for Grace Park pics.)

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (3) | PermaLink | Category: Web Sites
Posted by John DeNardo at Friday September 15, 2006 at 12:59 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Thursday September 14, 2006 at 12:23 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

As discussed by you, the loyal SF Signal readers. Some liberties have been taken with the term 'SF' to allow horror and or fantasy threats.

I present the Top 27 Coolest SF Threats, in no particular order, although multiple nominations are listed first....

  • Everyone's favorite Elder Being, Cthulhu.
  • The risen Dead from Peter F. Hamilton's Night's Dawn trilogy.
  • The Bersekers from Fred Saberhagen's Berserker series of books. Similarly, the machine race from Gregory Benford's Galactic Center novels.
  • The eponymous Aliens from the Aliens series of movies.
  • A rogue AI - Scott Westerfeld's Risen Empire books, Colossus: The Forbin Project and from Karl Schroeder's Ventus.
  • The planet Endurium in the classic PC game, Starflight.
  • The Inhibitors from Alastair Reynold's Revelation Space books.
  • The planet eater from the Star Trek episode, The Doomsday Machine.
  • The wandering superstring from Stellvia Of The Universe.
  • The blast front from the exploding core of the galaxy from Larry Niven's Known Space stories.
  • The grey goo from Greg Bear's Blood Music.
  • The Yuzon Vong from the Star Wars Expanded Universe.
  • Galactus, from The Fantastic Four comics.
  • The Grendel from Legacy Of Heorot.
  • Larry Niven's version of the Kzinti.
  • The Reavers from Firefly/Serenity.
  • A more personal threat here, the poison gel packs used to 'motivate' people in Gibson's Neuromancer.
  • How can we forget God, in the movie Time Bandits?
  • The Jain from Neal Asher's Polity Universe.
  • The Prime aliens in Peter F. Hamilton's Commonwealth books (Pandora's Star, Judas Unchained).
  • The Hypotheticals from Charles Wilson's Hugo winning Spin.
  • The Omega Clouds from Jack McDevitt's Engine Of God series.
  • The 'Dust' from Pullman's His Dark Materials series.
  • The Shadows from Babylon 5.
  • The Triffids from The Day Of The Triffids.
  • The Death Star, from Star Wars.
  • The Blight from Vinge's A Fire Upon The Deep.

So there you have it, some of the coolest threats faced by characters and/or societies in SF/Fantasy/Horror. It's a nice list and I must say I have actually seen or read about all of these before, so nothing I hadn't encountered before. I recommend reading/watching any of the above listed books/movies if you haven't already!

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (8) | PermaLink | Category: Books, Movies, TV
Posted by JP Frantz at Wednesday September 13, 2006 at 1:05 PM
© 2006 SF Signal

Joel Schumacher will be directing a vampire Nazi movie! Sound familiar?

The Hollywood Reporter says the Batman & Robin director has signed up to helm Town Creek, a vampy Gold Circle horror movie. If vampires aren't enough to get you interested, they're also throwing in Nazis. It's the story of a West Virginia man who helps his brother wipe out a family that once protected a Nazi vampire. See, genocide alone isn't bad enough, to be really really evil you've also got to be a blood sucker.
OK, technically, it's not thievery since Schumacher's film lacks zombies...and time-traveling...and Green Bay Packers. But you get my point. I think.

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (2) | PermaLink | Category: Movies
Posted by John DeNardo at Wednesday September 13, 2006 at 12:20 PM
© 2006 SF Signal

Continuing the theme of the first and second parts, I submit without comment this excerpt from Grumpy Old Bookman:

...it is a fundamental error, with moral implications, to think of fiction as a hierarchy, a sort of tower block, if you will, with literary fiction at the top and the 'lower' types of fiction tucked away in the basement. That is a concept which has no intellectual validity.

The correct way to think of the various genres of fiction is as a street of many bookshops; and in this street there are no prime sites. Each shop pays the same business taxes as any other: all shops are equal. And the smart customer places her business in different shops at different times; to the advantage of everyone, most importantly herself.

[Via]

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Books
Posted by John DeNardo at Wednesday September 13, 2006 at 2:00 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (1) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Wednesday September 13, 2006 at 1:38 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

TrekMovie.com has a few trailers posted for the upcoming remastered Star Trek series. Additionally, and more importantly (and finally!), they also have a station listing of all the affiliates airing the remastered series, as well as the times. For Houston? Channel 13, KTRK, will be airing the show on Saturdays, at 1:05am!!! Urk.

Sadly, CBS will not be making the HD version available to its affiliates to air. Some one at CBS is apparently too busy screwing the pooch to realize what a terrible PR move this is. Many CBS stations are capable of handling HD feeds, yet CBS won't distribute it to them. I'm tihnking HD-DVDs in the future are the reason here. Yes, a conspiracy theory. CBS will whet the appetites of Trekkies everywhere with the standard def broadcasts, then will try to convinve them to buy the shiny new HD-DVDs at a later date. The bastages!

Still, I'll record the first few to see what it looks like. Will you?

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (7) | PermaLink | Category: TV
Posted by JP Frantz at Tuesday September 12, 2006 at 10:58 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Yes, I'm still reading The Space Opera Renaissance, the massive Tor anthology edited by David G. Hartwell and Kathryn Cramer. I'm enjoying the heck out of it but I have to admit, the sheer size of the thing is playing games with my sense of progress.

This hardback clocks in at 944 pages. But not just any 944 pages. No, these pages have some sort of patented smaller-than-average Tiny-Type which means, all things being equal, it's longer than most books of the same size. I do not know the word count - and I would love to know that and the average word count for the average book - but as a guess, I'd say this is the word-count equivalent of 3 or 4 "standard-length" books.

The good news with respect to closure is that I'm almost done. But this has to be the longest book I've ever read. I usually average about a book a week. I've been reading TSOR for over 5 weeks now. (To be fair, though, I have sneaked in two other quick-read books in the interim.)

What's the lengthiest book you've ever read? Hubbard's Battlefield Earth? Stephenson's Quicksilver? War & Peace? No fair counting omnibuses!

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (18) | PermaLink | Category: Books
Posted by John DeNardo at Tuesday September 12, 2006 at 12:30 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Tuesday September 12, 2006 at 12:14 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Issue #897 (September 15, 2006) of Entertainment Weekly offers some brief reviews of science fiction and fantasy books. Here's a snippet...

Variable Star by Robert A. Heinlein and Spider Robinson
For Fans of: The late master's Future History stories.
Lowdown: An enjoyable read. Star incorporates plenty of Heinlein's liberal social theories, but not enough of his sharp moral edge.
Grade: B

Mappa Mundi by Justina Robson
For Fans of: Brave New World or Neal Stephenson's Snow Crash, if they met Thomas Pynchon in a cybercafe.
Lowdown: A lyrical, attentively-written anti-utopia.
Grade: A-

Stamping Butterflies by Jon Courtenay Grimwood
For Fans of: The Matrix.
Lowdown: Grimwood's hard-boiled prose reels you in like a velvet rope (smiles twist "lips without ever reaching your eyes"). Too bad about reality being an illusion, though.
Grade: B+

A Meeting at Corvallis by S.M. Stirling
For Fans of: Forget Tolkien - does the Society for Creative Anachronism ring a bell?
Lowdown: Diehards will find this richly realized story or swordplay and intrigue immensely satisfying.
Grade: B

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Books
Posted by John DeNardo at Tuesday September 12, 2006 at 12:11 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Monday September 11, 2006 at 12:09 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Here are the results of the latest SF Signal poll.

QUESTION
Which of these is your favorite fictional robot from literature?

RESULTS
(68 total votes)


Marvin and R. Daneel took a significant amount of votes here. Should I not have bothered with the other choices? :)

Be sure to vote in this week's poll on When to Stop Reading!

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (3) | PermaLink | Category: Polls
Posted by John DeNardo at Monday September 11, 2006 at 12:00 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Historian and futurist W. Warren Wagar reviews the range of H.G. Wells's contributions to the discipline of future thinking in this 1983 article H.G. Wells and the Genesis of Future Studies. It mentions Wells's work, including Anticipations of the Reactions of Mechanical and Scientific Progress upon Human Life and Thought. (Yay Gutenberg!)

Here's an excerpt of Wagar's article on Wells's prediction powers:

Anticipations ranged widely in its subject matter, from the future of transport to the future of world order. The first chapters are familiar fare to anyone who has read other books of the time by journalists sketching with enthusiasm the progress to be expected from science in the new century. Wells looked ahead to the first aircraft and to broad highways teeming with automobiles, busses, and trucks. Suburbia would triumph over city and countryside. In the United States. one vast unbroken sprawl of middle-class life would reach from Boston to Washington. Homes would be prefabricated, and household appliances and chemicals would put an end to the need for servants.

But in later chapters, Wells turned from his predictions of miracle dishwashing solvents and tidy electric ranges to something that for him was much more crucial. By the close of the 20th century, he foresaw the collapse of capitalism and the nation state system in great technologically advanced total wars that the tycoons and the politicians could not, ultimately, understand or control. Power would slip through their fingers. They would be swiftly replaced by the technically competent, by scientists and engineers and managers, who would learn from their errors and build a world state of peace and plenty.

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Books
Posted by John DeNardo at Sunday September 10, 2006 at 11:48 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Tim @ Random Observations has a Science Fiction and Leftism post in which he details seven leftists trends in science fcition. Here's the short version:

7 Leftist Trends in Science Fiction

  1. The Misunderstood Villain

  2. Moral "Evolution"

  3. Atheism

  4. Globalism

  5. Child-Worship

  6. Moral and Cultural Relativism

  7. Free Love

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (13) | PermaLink | Category: Books, TV
Posted by John DeNardo at Sunday September 10, 2006 at 11:33 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

English novelist Nick Hornby wrote a surprisingly frank essay about how to read in which he suggests people fight the urge to stop reading something they are not enjoying. His thoughts stemmed from not wanting to continually slam unentertaining books in his reviews:

My solution was to try to choose books I knew I would like. I'm not sure this idea is as blindingly obvious as it seems. We often read books that we think we ought to read, or that we think we ought to have read, or that other people think we should read (I'm always coming across people who have a mental, sometimes even an actual, list of the books they think they should have read by the time they turn 40, 50, or die); I'm sure I'm not the only one who harrumphs his way through a highly praised novel, astonished but actually rather pleased that so many people have got it so wrong.
He argues that people feel compelled to read things they might dislike and end up associating reading with hard work and ultimately boredom. The result could be a decline in readership.
If reading books is to survive as a leisure activity - and there are statistics that show that this is by no means assured - then we have to promote the joys of reading, rather than the (dubious) benefits.
The solution?

Read more...

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (3) | PermaLink | Category: Books
Posted by John DeNardo at Sunday September 10, 2006 at 11:24 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (2) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Saturday September 09, 2006 at 12:01 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Today is the 40th anniversary of the first airing of Star Trek.

Does anything more than this need to be said?

UPDATE: Apparently something more does need to be said. As part of his own personal celebration, Wil Wheaton has begun reviewing Star Trek: The Next Generation episodes for TV Squad. Not that I troll Wil Wheaton's blog or anything...

UPDATE #2: The Top 9 Ways to Celebrate Star Trek's 40th Birthday.

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: TV
Posted by John DeNardo at Friday September 08, 2006 at 8:28 PM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (2) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Friday September 08, 2006 at 12:00 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Today, Amazon has announced their video download service, called Amazon Unbox. They will have TV shows and movies available for downloading, raning in price from $1.99 to $14.99. As a special promotion, Amazon is offering an instant $1.99 rebate. Who not download an episode of your favorite science fiction show? They have some good stuff in there.

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (2) | PermaLink | Category: Web Sites
Posted by JP Frantz at Thursday September 07, 2006 at 5:12 PM
© 2006 SF Signal


MY RATING:

BRIEF SYNOPSIS: Sam Tyler is a detective in the modern day Manchester police department. Sam's girlfriend is kidnapped by a serial killer he is hunting and, while trying to find her, Sam is struck by a car. Upon waking, he discovers he is in Manchester, 1973. Sam tries to discover whether he has actually traveled back in time, is in a coma imagining 1973, or if he has imagined 2006 and is actually crazy.

PROS: Very good characters, lots of humor, intriguing premise, being on the BBC allows for more graphic language (you know, for verisimilitude).
CONS: Episodes feel uneven in tone and content, characters don't really change too much.
BOTTOM LINE: A very interesting cop drama with strong characters and mixing in hints of time travel. If you get BBC and you want a good, but different, cop show, check out Life On Mars.

Read more...

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (2) | PermaLink | Category: TV
Posted by JP Frantz at Thursday September 07, 2006 at 4:04 PM
© 2006 SF Signal

Some of you may have noticed yesterday an Instant Message box appeared on the left sidebar. We discovered a neat little IM widget from Meebo.com that allows website visitors to chat with the website authors. We thought that was a cool idea so we installed it. What we didn't like was the load time or the look of the thing. So, we moved it. As you can now see, there is a NEW icon next to the Chat with us link. This will open a new window with two IM widgets installed that will allow you to chat with either myself (JP) or John, assuming, of course that we are online and at our PCs and are available to chat. Which, since John is pretty much a slacker, means almost anytime during the work day....

You can edit your nickname if you want us to see who you are, or just leave it with the randomly assigned name. We thought this might be fun so give it a try and tell us what you think!

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (5) | PermaLink | Category: Meta
Posted by JP Frantz at Thursday September 07, 2006 at 11:01 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (3) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Thursday September 07, 2006 at 12:32 AM
© 2006 SF Signal


MY RATING:

BRIEF SYNOPSIS: Harry Dresden is Chicago's only openly practicing wizard/private detective. As might be expected, Harry encounters lots of different supernatural entities, most of which try to kill him.

PROS: Non-stop action, smooth prose, interesting characters, unique setting, a page-turner.
CONS: Quite often Harry extricates himself from dire situations via the plot and not his own initiative.
BOTTOM LINE: A very entertaining and enjoyable read. This combination of fantasy/supernatural and P.I. genres works very well. A must read for fantasy fans.

Read more...

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Book Review
Posted by JP Frantz at Wednesday September 06, 2006 at 2:53 PM
© 2006 SF Signal

[Note: This has been sitting on my computer for a while now and I recently rediscovered it. So if you're wondering why this links back to old posts on other blogs, there you go.]

A couple of months ago, Grumpy Old Bookman gave a not-so-nice review of Stranger Things Happen by Kelly Link. I'm not picking on the book here; I just call it out because the post is fertile ground for some discussions on the sf/f genre. Grumpy Old Bookman posits (and I'm summarizing) that in order to become more respectable in publishing circles, the sf community has been quietly giving unwarranted kudos to literary science fiction instead of more deserving books:

So what they have begun to do, consciously or unconsciously, is award prizes to work which could, on a dark night, be mistaken for literary stuff. They are doing this in the hope that, if they do it often enough, and shout loudly about it, they might one day be admitted to the Groucho club and get to meet Marty and Salman and all those other guys. Then they will be able to hold their heads up high in decent company.
This is an intriguing notion partly because it affirms my belief that awards do not necessarily point one towards books they'd enjoy. Certainly my recent experiences reading the Nebula and Hugo short fiction nominees also support this idea. My own track record of reading award-winning sf is spotty at best. I couldn't finish The Left Hand of Darkness, for example.

Which is not to say award winners stink, of course. Many, if not most, are quite enjoyable so they can point someone looking for a good read in the right direction. There's also a distinction that exists between "good" and enjoyable, I think. A book can be well-written, tackle tough issues, have complex plots and characters - and still be a mediocre read.

This reminds me of the Literary Snob post and where I sit in the literary spectrum. While I like a literary book once in a while, I find I like reading things on the other side of spectrum more because it best provides what I'm looking for in a book: entertainment. Grumpy Old Bookman feels the same...

If I have to choose between skiffy with literary pretensions and skiffy with bug-eyed monsters, I will gladly choose the latter, any day of the week.
As does David Goodman...
I read a lot of science fiction, some of it mind-bogglingly complex and filled with ideas that make my head hurt (in a good way). The last thing it needs is impenetrable, plotless storylines, author-clone characters and rambling stream-of-consciousness dirges (I generalise, sorry).
Goodman also goes on to say what he likes so much about sf and why the idea that sf genre is a literary ghetto is hogwash.
People might think science fiction and its sister genres are literary ghettoes, but in my opinion they're the last reserves of the key elements of quality fiction - a damn good story that makes you think and the wherewithal to tell it well. For example, how many people still read Booker prize winners from the fifties, apart from obscure academics? Now, compare that to how many people read Heinlein, Pohl, Asimov and the rest. Printed fiction is our version of the Norse sagas, tribal stories around a campfire. And just like the sagas, the boring, uninspired or pointless tales die a death after their first telling, whereas the adventures that keep us riveted keep coming back.
I think the bottom line here is that different people like different things. Who's to say that your literary novel is better than my sf pulp? Can't we just all get along?

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (6) | PermaLink | Category: Books
Posted by John DeNardo at Wednesday September 06, 2006 at 12:05 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

The SciFi Channel is posting a 10-part Battlestar Galactica episode that bridges the gap between season 2 and season 3. New webisodes are posted every Tuesday and Thursday, starting today.

Reminder: Season 3 starts on October 6th.

[via Asking the Wrong Questions, who links to the torrent of part 1]

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (8) | PermaLink | Category: TV
Posted by John DeNardo at Tuesday September 05, 2006 at 4:00 PM
© 2006 SF Signal

According to a Bloomsbury poll of 16,000 British schoolchildren.

  1. Lord Voldemort from Harry Potter series by JK Rowling.

  2. Sauron from The Lord of the Rings Trilogy by JRR Tolkien.

  3. Mrs. Coulter from His Dark Materials Sequence by Philip Pullman.

  4. Lex Luthor from Superman Graphic novels by DC Comics.

  5. The Joker from Batman Graphic novels by DC Comics.

  6. Count Olaf from A Series of Unfortunate Events by Lemony Snicket.

  7. The Other Mother from Coraline by Neil Gaiman.

  8. The White Witch from The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe by CS Lewis.

  9. Dracula from Dracula by Bram Stoker.

  10. Artemis Fowl from Artemis Fowl by Eoin Colfer.

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (2) | PermaLink | Category: Books
Posted by John DeNardo at Tuesday September 05, 2006 at 3:40 PM
© 2006 SF Signal


REVIEW SUMMARY: Another fun book from Scott Westerfeld.

MY RATING:

BRIEF SYNOPSIS: A group of kids who possess supernatural abilities during the midnight hour fight off the sinister darklings.

MY REVIEW:
PROS: Fast-paced and interesting; cool depiction of the dark hour.
CONS: I would have liked to see more interplay between the characters when the Midnighters used their powers. The explanation of frozen time doesn't quite hold up under any reasonable amount of scrutiny.
BOTTOM LINE: A fun read for kids and adults.

Read more...

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (15) | PermaLink | Category: Book Review
Posted by John DeNardo at Tuesday September 05, 2006 at 12:16 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

MetaFilter points to four online stories by Ted Chiang:

The first three are collected in Stories of Your Life and Others, the last one is available in Year's Best SF 11 edited by David G. Hartwell and Kathryn Cramer.

[via Velcro CIty Tourist Board]

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Free Fiction
Posted by John DeNardo at Tuesday September 05, 2006 at 12:11 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Tuesday September 05, 2006 at 12:10 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (10) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Monday September 04, 2006 at 12:25 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Here are the results of the latest SF Signal poll.

QUESTION
Which of the following is the best movie that James Cameron directed?

RESULTS
(76 total votes)


Be sure to vote in this week's poll on Your Favorite Robot from Literature!

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Polls
Posted by John DeNardo at Monday September 04, 2006 at 12:00 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

A while back I was adamantly opposed to reading devices. I preferred the experience of reading a physical book over a digital counterpart. When I started my 2004 short story reading project, I became something of a convert. While I generally do not read novels on the PDA, I'm OK (and sometimes prefer) reading short stories on the PDA. There are many features that mobile reading offers.

But I have to draw the line somewhere.

There's a prototype of a new device called BiblioRoll that is meant to enhance the reading experience by simulating picking up a book off a shelf and reading it. It looks like one of those drive-thru bank pneumatic tube carriers and it works by twisting it and pressing buttons.

While I applaud the intention of finding new ways to make digital reading more usable, I gotta say my impression of this device is far from "Hey, that's cool!" This device looks to be cumbersome and too large. Check out the video and you'll see what I mean. Does this thing look like must-have device to you?

[via MobileRead]

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (3) | PermaLink | Category: Science and Technology
Posted by John DeNardo at Sunday September 03, 2006 at 12:23 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Sunday September 03, 2006 at 12:05 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Public Domain Torrents is a site that hosts torrent files for many feature films that are now in the public domain. They have a decent SF section with over 150 movies available. Of course, you don't get Forbidden Planet, but you do get Teenagers From Outer Space ("The high court may very well sentence you to TORTURE!!!!"). In fact, I see several movies that have been featured on Myster Science Theater 3000. They PDA, iPod and PSP versions available, and some movies are even hosted on Google Video for those of you without bittorrent or one of the above listed playback devices.

Happy hunting!

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (5) | PermaLink | Category: Movies
Posted by JP Frantz at Saturday September 02, 2006 at 7:42 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (2) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Saturday September 02, 2006 at 12:42 AM
© 2006 SF Signal


MY RATING:

BRIEF SYNOPSIS: In the far future, small corporations, called Fiefecorps, battle between one another to win the hearts and bodies, almost literally, of consumers. They produce the software products that control the OCHRES (nano-bots) present in every living human. Fiefecorp master Natch has raised his fiefecorp's rating faster than any other in history, using a mix of products and shady marketing. It is Natch who is selected by Margaret Surina to help bring her revolutionary product, MultiReal to market.

MY REVIEW:
PROS: Impressively detailed future society, well thought-out consequences of future software development, makes the boardroom an interesting place to read about.
CONS: Aside from Natch, the other characters aren't really well developed, I didn't really buy in what MultiReal is.
BOTTOM LINE: A very strong debut novel mixing a historically detailed timeline with an intriguing technological future. David Louis Edelman makes reading about corporate shenanigans fun.

Read more...

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Book Review
Posted by JP Frantz at Friday September 01, 2006 at 3:44 PM
© 2006 SF Signal

Star Trek (the original series) will be getting a Lucas-like CGI makeover.

Updates include a computer-generated Enterprise; CGI upgrades for battle sequences, ship exteriors, galaxy shots and landscapes; and a re-recorded opening score with a remastered voice-over. Each episode is also being converted to high-deinition format for those who wish to broadcast in HD. [TVology 101 has more.]

All I know is that if Paramount goes all Lucas on it and they make it so that Evil Kirk shoots first, JP is gonna be really pissed off. On the bright side, at least now he'll be able to see "Spock's Brain" in HD, the way it was meant to be seen.

Edit: fixed broken link to TVology101.

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (3) | PermaLink | Category: TV
Posted by John DeNardo at Friday September 01, 2006 at 12:08 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (2) | PermaLink | Category: Tidbits
Posted by John DeNardo at Friday September 01, 2006 at 12:01 AM
© 2006 SF Signal

This is the August 2006 update of my New Year's Resolution to (almost) read a short story a day.

QUICK STATS:
   STARTING SF-POINTS©: 276
   SF-POINTS© EARNED THIS MONTH: 62 (QUOTA: 31)
   YEAR-TO-DATE SF-POINTS©: 338 (YTD QUOTA: 243)

Read more...

Share:
Comment on this post Comments (0) | PermaLink | Category: Books
Posted by John DeNardo at Friday September 01, 2006 at 12:00 AM
© 2006 SF Signal