<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REVIEW: The Year&#8217;s Best Science Fiction #24 edited by Gardner Dozois</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2007/08/review_the_years_best_science_fiction_24_edited_by_gardner_dozois/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2007/08/review_the_years_best_science_fiction_24_edited_by_gardner_dozois/</link>
	<description>A science fiction blog featuring science fiction book reviews and with frequent ramblings on fantasy, computers and the web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 02:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshua corning</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2007/08/review_the_years_best_science_fiction_24_edited_by_gardner_dozois/#comment-73670</link>
		<dc:creator>joshua corning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 04:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2007/08/review_the_years_best_science_fiction_24_edited_by_gardner_dozois/#comment-73670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Of course, that same strategy may also mean that there are some offerings that are not to taste&lt;/i&gt;

Yeah the number of global warming scare stories in volume 23 was unbearable. (hopefully it will soon go the same way as telepathy, and fear of chemicals and nuclear radiation did.)

But the &quot;Isn&#039;t great I am gay&quot; story wasn&#039;t to bad.

Zima blue was also in that volume...one of the best stories i have read in some time...i might have pre judged Alastier Renalods...his talent is clearly in short form fiction.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Of course, that same strategy may also mean that there are some offerings that are not to taste</i></p>
<p>Yeah the number of global warming scare stories in volume 23 was unbearable. (hopefully it will soon go the same way as telepathy, and fear of chemicals and nuclear radiation did.)</p>
<p>But the &#8220;Isn&#8217;t great I am gay&#8221; story wasn&#8217;t to bad.</p>
<p>Zima blue was also in that volume&#8230;one of the best stories i have read in some time&#8230;i might have pre judged Alastier Renalods&#8230;his talent is clearly in short form fiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2007/08/review_the_years_best_science_fiction_24_edited_by_gardner_dozois/#comment-73669</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 04:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2007/08/review_the_years_best_science_fiction_24_edited_by_gardner_dozois/#comment-73669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the link...I&#039;ve updated the post. :)

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link&#8230;I&#8217;ve updated the post. <img src='http://www.sfsignal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2007/08/review_the_years_best_science_fiction_24_edited_by_gardner_dozois/#comment-73668</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 03:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2007/08/review_the_years_best_science_fiction_24_edited_by_gardner_dozois/#comment-73668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greg Egan&#039;s story &quot;Riding the Crocodile&quot; is available on-line at http://gregegan.customer.netspace.net.au/INCANDESCENCE/00/Crocodile.html

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg Egan&#8217;s story &#8220;Riding the Crocodile&#8221; is available on-line at <a href="http://gregegan.customer.netspace.net.au/INCANDESCENCE/00/Crocodile.html" rel="nofollow">http://gregegan.customer.netspace.net.au/INCANDESCENCE/00/Crocodile.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theproffet</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2007/08/review_the_years_best_science_fiction_24_edited_by_gardner_dozois/#comment-73667</link>
		<dc:creator>theproffet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2007/08/review_the_years_best_science_fiction_24_edited_by_gardner_dozois/#comment-73667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been reading Dozois&#039;s yearly anthology since around the tenth collection, and began buying them eight years ago, so this is always a must buy for me. I&#039;ve always thought it would be impossible to attempt to read all the magazines, and now, go to all the fiction sites, in order to have a clear view of shorter SF--but luckily, Dozois does this for me!  In previous years, some of the collections do tend a bit toward the grim side, but that&#039;s one advantage to anthologies of shorter fiction--you can sample an unpleasant future, without being stuck in it for the length of a novel. And as John pointed out above, short fiction is great for fans with time constraints--although I&#039;d reckon my taste is  more for the short, bracing effects of a shot of liquor, rather than a complex cocktail.  And of course, an anthology such as this is perhaps the best way to find current authors who&#039;s novels I&#039;d enjoy.  Previous editions got me to check out the works of Swanwick, Egan, and Reynolds, yet another wonderful aspect of the series . . .

So bravo for the yearly anthologies!  (Ah, I used to love the Harrison and Aldiss Best SF:19__ series--odd and eclectic, they turned me onto Gene Wolf and Michael Bishop.)

I haven&#039;t finished this years anthology yet, just recieved it from the SFBC, and I&#039;ll probably savor it for awhile, reading a story or two every so often. But I loved the first two--I prefer my Doctorow in short bits, and found I, Rowboat amusingly recursive.  And Wilson&#039;s tale is wryly elegant--maybe it&#039;s just me, but caught a whiff of Gene Wolf&#039;s style in the questionable first person narrative.

Not many comments on Dozois&#039;s summation so far, but of course, that&#039;s the first thing most people would read . . .  After reading so many in the series, this years preface is a bit too familiar, although he did  throw in a couple of funny lines.  And his annual plea to support magazines unfortunately may be falling on deaf ears--with collections this good, why wade through the bad stuff?

In closing, thanks for the individual story reviews John, they will undoubtedly aid in my appreciation--Dozois&#039;s introductory notes on them are sometimes a bit too ambiguously coy . . .  ;-)

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been reading Dozois&#8217;s yearly anthology since around the tenth collection, and began buying them eight years ago, so this is always a must buy for me. I&#8217;ve always thought it would be impossible to attempt to read all the magazines, and now, go to all the fiction sites, in order to have a clear view of shorter SF&#8211;but luckily, Dozois does this for me!  In previous years, some of the collections do tend a bit toward the grim side, but that&#8217;s one advantage to anthologies of shorter fiction&#8211;you can sample an unpleasant future, without being stuck in it for the length of a novel. And as John pointed out above, short fiction is great for fans with time constraints&#8211;although I&#8217;d reckon my taste is  more for the short, bracing effects of a shot of liquor, rather than a complex cocktail.  And of course, an anthology such as this is perhaps the best way to find current authors who&#8217;s novels I&#8217;d enjoy.  Previous editions got me to check out the works of Swanwick, Egan, and Reynolds, yet another wonderful aspect of the series . . .</p>
<p>So bravo for the yearly anthologies!  (Ah, I used to love the Harrison and Aldiss Best SF:19__ series&#8211;odd and eclectic, they turned me onto Gene Wolf and Michael Bishop.)</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t finished this years anthology yet, just recieved it from the SFBC, and I&#8217;ll probably savor it for awhile, reading a story or two every so often. But I loved the first two&#8211;I prefer my Doctorow in short bits, and found I, Rowboat amusingly recursive.  And Wilson&#8217;s tale is wryly elegant&#8211;maybe it&#8217;s just me, but caught a whiff of Gene Wolf&#8217;s style in the questionable first person narrative.</p>
<p>Not many comments on Dozois&#8217;s summation so far, but of course, that&#8217;s the first thing most people would read . . .  After reading so many in the series, this years preface is a bit too familiar, although he did  throw in a couple of funny lines.  And his annual plea to support magazines unfortunately may be falling on deaf ears&#8211;with collections this good, why wade through the bad stuff?</p>
<p>In closing, thanks for the individual story reviews John, they will undoubtedly aid in my appreciation&#8211;Dozois&#8217;s introductory notes on them are sometimes a bit too ambiguously coy . . .  <img src='http://www.sfsignal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2007/08/review_the_years_best_science_fiction_24_edited_by_gardner_dozois/#comment-73666</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2007/08/review_the_years_best_science_fiction_24_edited_by_gardner_dozois/#comment-73666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[True.  Good thing you have our reviews to steer you clear of the trash. (H)

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True.  Good thing you have our reviews to steer you clear of the trash. (H)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scottsh</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2007/08/review_the_years_best_science_fiction_24_edited_by_gardner_dozois/#comment-73665</link>
		<dc:creator>Scottsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2007/08/review_the_years_best_science_fiction_24_edited_by_gardner_dozois/#comment-73665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I understand what you are saying about not giving up on short fiction, but reading 23 stories I didnt care for in order to find 5 I did just seems like too high of a price to pay.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand what you are saying about not giving up on short fiction, but reading 23 stories I didnt care for in order to find 5 I did just seems like too high of a price to pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2007/08/review_the_years_best_science_fiction_24_edited_by_gardner_dozois/#comment-73664</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 15:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2007/08/review_the_years_best_science_fiction_24_edited_by_gardner_dozois/#comment-73664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the reasons I stopped reading &quot;year&#039;s best&quot; anthos is because they strive so hard to represent all the various aspects of the genre that, naturally, many of the stories fall into types that I just don&#039;t particularly enjoy reading. If I have a lot of spare time these types of books can be a way to discover new authors I didn&#039;t know about, but these days I don&#039;t tend to have that kind of spare time.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the reasons I stopped reading &#8220;year&#8217;s best&#8221; anthos is because they strive so hard to represent all the various aspects of the genre that, naturally, many of the stories fall into types that I just don&#8217;t particularly enjoy reading. If I have a lot of spare time these types of books can be a way to discover new authors I didn&#8217;t know about, but these days I don&#8217;t tend to have that kind of spare time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2007/08/review_the_years_best_science_fiction_24_edited_by_gardner_dozois/#comment-73663</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2007/08/review_the_years_best_science_fiction_24_edited_by_gardner_dozois/#comment-73663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just thought of something else...

RE: Frankly I&#039;m going to stop reading short fiction again for a while - while there were some gems in here, I found most of them to be quite lacking.

That&#039;s too bad as some short fiction stories put some novels to shame.  Don&#039;t let one book be the basis for that decision.  In my opinion, you are unlikely to find a &quot;best of the year&quot; anthology that where every single story is a 5-star winner.  Such books reflect the choices of one individual and the trick is to find an editor whose tastes coincide with your own.  (I&#039;m ignoring the weirdness that exists when compiling these anthologies, like license rights, space constraints, etc.)  That said, my recollection of &lt;strong&gt;The Science Fiction Hall of Fame, Volume 1&lt;/strong&gt; (which was admittedly formed during my more impressionable and less critical days) was that it&#039;s outstanding overall.

Time commitment is a factor as well, isn&#039;t it?  What if you want a jolt of sf but do not have the time for a novel?  Oh wait -- I forgot I&#039;m talking to our own in-house Klausner!  ;-)

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thought of something else&#8230;</p>
<p>RE: Frankly I&#8217;m going to stop reading short fiction again for a while &#8211; while there were some gems in here, I found most of them to be quite lacking.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s too bad as some short fiction stories put some novels to shame.  Don&#8217;t let one book be the basis for that decision.  In my opinion, you are unlikely to find a &#8220;best of the year&#8221; anthology that where every single story is a 5-star winner.  Such books reflect the choices of one individual and the trick is to find an editor whose tastes coincide with your own.  (I&#8217;m ignoring the weirdness that exists when compiling these anthologies, like license rights, space constraints, etc.)  That said, my recollection of <strong>The Science Fiction Hall of Fame, Volume 1</strong> (which was admittedly formed during my more impressionable and less critical days) was that it&#8217;s outstanding overall.</p>
<p>Time commitment is a factor as well, isn&#8217;t it?  What if you want a jolt of sf but do not have the time for a novel?  Oh wait &#8212; I forgot I&#8217;m talking to our own in-house Klausner!  <img src='http://www.sfsignal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2007/08/review_the_years_best_science_fiction_24_edited_by_gardner_dozois/#comment-73662</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2007/08/review_the_years_best_science_fiction_24_edited_by_gardner_dozois/#comment-73662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;&gt; In my opinion, a short work has to stand on its own a self-contained story. It can NOT just be a chapter from a novel, and it seems to me that&#039;s what most of the authors here have done.

Agreed -- otherwise it would be an excerpt!  However, I thought all of the stories here &lt;em&gt;were&lt;/em&gt; self-contained.  Sure, some of them could be used as episodes in a larger story - that&#039;s actually a common stepping-stone practice with writers. (See Allen Steele&#039;s &lt;strong&gt;Coyote&lt;/strong&gt; stories, for example).  But I thought each story in this collection had a setup and resolution.

In response to your concern over quality...this was to varying degrees of success.  I mean, &quot;Riding the Crocodile&quot; is praised all over the place but it was just not my cup of tea.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>> In my opinion, a short work has to stand on its own a self-contained story. It can NOT just be a chapter from a novel, and it seems to me that&#8217;s what most of the authors here have done.</p>
<p>Agreed &#8212; otherwise it would be an excerpt!  However, I thought all of the stories here <em>were</em> self-contained.  Sure, some of them could be used as episodes in a larger story &#8211; that&#8217;s actually a common stepping-stone practice with writers. (See Allen Steele&#8217;s <strong>Coyote</strong> stories, for example).  But I thought each story in this collection had a setup and resolution.</p>
<p>In response to your concern over quality&#8230;this was to varying degrees of success.  I mean, &#8220;Riding the Crocodile&#8221; is praised all over the place but it was just not my cup of tea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottsh</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2007/08/review_the_years_best_science_fiction_24_edited_by_gardner_dozois/#comment-73661</link>
		<dc:creator>scottsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 13:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2007/08/review_the_years_best_science_fiction_24_edited_by_gardner_dozois/#comment-73661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read this book as well - it was sent to me by mistake, but I didn&#039;t let that stop me from checking it out before sending it on to John (sorry John!).  I was pretty disappointed.  I used to read a lot of short fiction in the past but quit because I felt the best writing was being done in novels.  Frankly I&#039;m going to stop reading short fiction again for a while - while there were some gems in here, I found most of them to be quite lacking.

In my opinion, a short work has to stand on its own a self-contained story.  It can NOT just be a chapter from a novel, and it seems to me that&#039;s what most of the authors here have done.

For example, while I enjoyed the writing and the style of Robert Charles Wilson&#039;s novella &lt;b&gt;Julian: A Christmas Story&lt;/b&gt; there simply isn&#039;t much story here.  The characters are well done, but this is obviously a slice of a larger work (even if this doesn&#039;t end up being created, I felt the author was thinking that way.)

Like John I enjoyed &lt;strong&gt;Damascus&lt;/strong&gt; (my personal favorite), &lt;strong&gt;Nightingale&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;Dead Men Walking&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;Kin&lt;/strong&gt;, and &lt;strong&gt;Signal to Noise&lt;/strong&gt;.  But that was it - the rest I wish I hadn&#039;t taken the time to read.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this book as well &#8211; it was sent to me by mistake, but I didn&#8217;t let that stop me from checking it out before sending it on to John (sorry John!).  I was pretty disappointed.  I used to read a lot of short fiction in the past but quit because I felt the best writing was being done in novels.  Frankly I&#8217;m going to stop reading short fiction again for a while &#8211; while there were some gems in here, I found most of them to be quite lacking.</p>
<p>In my opinion, a short work has to stand on its own a self-contained story.  It can NOT just be a chapter from a novel, and it seems to me that&#8217;s what most of the authors here have done.</p>
<p>For example, while I enjoyed the writing and the style of Robert Charles Wilson&#8217;s novella <b>Julian: A Christmas Story</b> there simply isn&#8217;t much story here.  The characters are well done, but this is obviously a slice of a larger work (even if this doesn&#8217;t end up being created, I felt the author was thinking that way.)</p>
<p>Like John I enjoyed <strong>Damascus</strong> (my personal favorite), <strong>Nightingale</strong>, <strong>Dead Men Walking</strong>, <strong>Kin</strong>, and <strong>Signal to Noise</strong>.  But that was it &#8211; the rest I wish I hadn&#8217;t taken the time to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
