Continuing our look at the upcoming Fall TV genre offerings (see ABC's Fall Lineup), today we'll look at CBS, The CW (nice name), and that bastion of genre programming on TV, Fox. While NBC and ABC are loading up on new genre shows, both CBS and The CW only have one, while Fox is tempting early cancellation with two.
Share:
|
Discussion (3)
| PermaLink
| Posted by JP on Tuesday July 31, 2007 - 3:50 PM
| Category: TV
| © 2007 SF Signal
Fanboy has found an interview that Tom Snyder did with some of the cast members of the original Star Trek (Bones, Scotty, and Chekov). See also: Parts two, three, four and five. Harlan Ellison also makes an appearance and gets into it a little bit with Scotty in part 5, calling it "a cop show in space". I'm wondering who would win in a fist fight between the two.
Share:
|
Discussion (1)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Tuesday July 31, 2007 - 12:25 AM
| Category: Star Trek
| © 2007 SF Signal

Share:
|
Discussion (0)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Tuesday July 31, 2007 - 12:15 AM
| Category: Tidbits
| © 2007 SF Signal

Share:
|
Discussion (3)
| PermaLink
| Posted by JP on Tuesday July 31, 2007 - 12:03 AM
| Category: Battlestar Galactica, TV, Tube Bits
| © 2007 SF Signal
The Fall 2007 TV season is almost upon us. This is the first post in a series that will examine the genre offerings of the major TV networks, as well as cable networks. First up is ABC and its slate of genre related programming. ABC has a few new and interesting genre shows this season, and I'm already discounting the sure-to-be-excreble Cavemen. First up, Eli Stone.
Share:
|
Discussion (2)
| PermaLink
| Posted by JP on Monday July 30, 2007 - 2:21 PM
| Category: TV
| © 2007 SF Signal

REVIEW SUMMARY: Mmmm...cityscapes...
MY RATING: ![]()
BRIEF SYNOPSIS: Collects the artwork of Stephan Martiniere beyond that presented in Quantum Dreams.
MY REVIEW:
PROS: Outstanding vision and imagination; images evoke a sense-of-wonder.
CONS: The alien sketch work was good, but the cityscapes steal the show.
BOTTOM LINE: A very good showcase of the Martiniere's road range.
(Warning: Juicy visuals follow the break...)

Stephan Martiniere is one of the premiere science fiction cover artists working today. Just one look at his work evokes the sense of wonder that science fiction fans demand: sprawling cityscapes, enormous space ships, realistic creatures. His latest book, Quantumscapes, does a very good job at showcasing his broad range.
The first chapter shows artwork done for book covers. A large portion of these are cityscape paintings which are, in my opinion, where Martiniere creates some of his most visually stunning work. The amount of detail in these images is amazing and the overall picture shows great imagination.
A section on film and commercial work contains sketch work which shows Martiniere has talent beyond the digital canvas. Only a few of these were carried to "production-level" artwork, though, where it becomes obvious that Martiniere has given more thought to anatomy than can be seen in the rough pencil/charcoal drawings. In other words, the drawings only hint at the full capability of the artist's vision.
A chapter on games presents pieces done for Magic: The Gathering, Myst 5 and Heaven: The Game, while another chapter presents his personal work. Saying that there are more aliens and more landscapes doesn't quite do justice to the consistently high level of quality Martiniere exhibits. Case in point: The final chapter of Quantumscapes dissects the creation of the image done for the book Variable Star by Robert A. Heinlein and Spider Robinson. It follows the production from initial sketch ("loose scribbles" that focus on composition instead of detail) to its awe-inspiring result. At the close of the chapter and book, Martiniere writes: "...eventually the end result is better than anything I could have imagined." I find this to be overly modest: it's clear that Martiniere has imagination and talent to spare.
The artwork in the book - with the usual beauty-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder caveat - is outstanding. For me, his cityscapes are jaw-dropping much the same way the city vistas of the Star Wars prequels were - which he also worked on. The book itself is of respectable production value. It consists of glossy pages of a nice hefty stock so images from opposite pages don't show through. A few notes accompany each image offering Martiniere's thoughts on that work. This soft cover book is only 95 pages long which seems a bit short based on his output, but not when you consider that his other work is showcased in the previously-released Quantum Dreams. I'd love to see a "complete works" omnibus, but that just gluttony talking. There's plenty of wonder to be found in Quantumscapes.
Share:
|
Discussion (3)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Monday July 30, 2007 - 12:28 AM
| Category: Book Review
| © 2007 SF Signal
Share:
|
Discussion (5)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Monday July 30, 2007 - 12:05 AM
| Category: Tidbits
| © 2007 SF Signal
[via TV Squad] August 4th marks the premiere of the new ABC sci-fi anthology series Masters of Science Fiction. The show, hosted by Stephen Hawking, boasts a star-studded lineup of stars and a quite an impressive list of writer credits, too. Unfortunately, the show has had a spotty production record. The ABC website lists four episodes to be aired in August, but the show's website lists these six episodes:
Episode: "A Clean Escape"
Synopsis: A dying Dr. Deanna Evans refuses to believe that her patient, Robert Havelmann, cannot remember the last 25 years of his life. It remains unclear why she has been so obsessed with this particular patient until the final, shocking conclusion.
Starring: Judy Davis and Sam Waterston
Based on the short story by: John Kessel
Episode: "The Awakening"
Synopsis: In the middle of a ferocious firefight outside of Baghdad, US soldiers discover a mysterious body--one that they can't even identify as human. Swiftly, all over the earth, more such creatures appear and begin to communicate. With this contact, the world is forced to choose between peace and destruction.
Starring: Terry O'Quinn and Elisabeth Rohm.
Based on the short story by: Howard Fast.
Episode: "Jerry Was a Man"
Synopsis: Mr. and Mrs. Bronson Van Vogel are the seventh-richest couple in the world. Pleasure is their only work; mundane or dangerous chores are done by anthropoids. All the anthropoids--a few strands of human DNA, grown into a baby and fused with plastics--are named "Joe." Somehow, Mrs. Van Vogel's dormant compassion is awakened by a Joe named Jerry. What traits would prove that Jerry is, indeed, a man?
Starring: Anne Heche and Malcolm McDowell.
Based on the short story by: Robert A. Heinlein.
Episode: "The Discarded"
Synopsis: The ultimate story of despised minorities forever adrift in the darkness of outer space. As a last resort - born out of their loneliness and despair - they are forced to make an ominous pact with those responsible for their plight, in the hope that they will finally be offered refuge at home on Earth.
Starring: John Hurt, Brian Dennehy and James Denton.
Based on the short story by: Harlan Ellison (who also wrote the teleplay).
Episode: "Little Brother"
Synopsis: In a future world where courtrooms exist without human judges or juries, automated justice is the law of the land. Sitting before a kiosk which is itself the judge, jury, and executioner of the future, Fredon must find a way to convince the machine of his innocence - or find some other way to save himself before time runs out.
Starring: Clifton Collins, Jr. and Kimberly Elise.
Based on the short story by: Walter Mosley (who also wrote the teleplay).
Episode: "Watchbird"
Synopsis: It seems the perfect solution to a ballooning crime rate - filling the skies with flying robotic droids that can prevent murder before it takes place. However, nobody told these "Watchbirds" that all life depends on a formula of carefully balanced killing. Robert Sheckley's renowned story examines one of the most important questions of our time - is it wise to sacrifice our liberty in the name of our security?
Starring: Sean Astin and James Cromwell.
Based on the short story by: Robert Sheckley (with a teleplay by Michael Straczynski).
Share:
|
Discussion (3)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Monday July 30, 2007 - 12:02 AM
| Category: TV
| © 2007 SF Signal
| (157 total votes) |
"You forgot an option: 'Yes - in spoilers,' for those of us who couldn't be bothered to read the last two (now three) books." - MehraBe sure to visit our front page and vote in this week's poll about The Masters of Science Fiction!
"Actually I'm borrowing it from the library" - Cynthia D.
"See you forgot the 'mooch' choice which is for all us folks who plan to obtain the book from the hordes who pre-ordered it." - Tim
Share:
|
Discussion (0)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Monday July 30, 2007 - 12:00 AM
| Category: Polls
| © 2007 SF Signal
No offense, but our own Tim does a better Gollum impersonation. I'm just sayin'...
Share:
|
Discussion (2)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Sunday July 29, 2007 - 12:20 AM
| Category: Movies
| © 2007 SF Signal

Share:
|
Discussion (0)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Sunday July 29, 2007 - 12:05 AM
| Category: Tidbits
| © 2007 SF Signal
If you're a Potter fan, you've been waiting for this book for a very long time, and, if you haven't read it yet, you may be wondering if its worth the wait. The short answer is: yes. As final books go, The Deathly Hallows wraps things up quite nicely indeed.
I'm not going to try and summarize the plot here, you can find that else where. I will say that in The Deathly Hallows, Harry returns to many places we've seen in earlier books: Gringots, The Shrieking Shack and The Ministry of Magic, among others. Each of these places plays a small role in the Harry's quest to defeat Voldemort. We also get to visit the house where Harry lived when Voldemort attacked his parents. This visit gives us some more insight into the events that happened that night, and show how prepared Voldemort is to find Harry and his friends. Rowling does a nice job of weaving all these places into the story, as Harry, Ron and Hermione try to find all of Voldemort's Horcruxes and figure out what the Deathly Hallows actually are.
As far as the plot goes, its basically a quest, with Harry and company running from encounter to encounter, trying to stay ahead of Voldemort and his cohorts. In fact, the first 2/3 of the book is basically Harry on the run, trying to figure things out while staying out of sight. Unfortunately, while there is some action during this period (the infiltration of The Ministry for example), this section tended to drag quite a bit, as it takes quite a bit of time for Harry and friends to figure out what they want to do, and how to do it. Once the siege of Hogwarts begins, however, the last part of the book is all action, and moves quite quickly toward it's satisfying showdown between Harry and Voldemort. Rowling obviously took some time to figure out how this showdown would occur, and weaved the pieces needed throughout the earlier parts. The twist that occurs is obvious in hindsight, but was executed quite well. I've heard some people say they didn't like the ultimate battle, but I felt it fit the story perfectly.
Where Rowling really shines in this book is with respect to Harry. She has grown as a writer over the years, and she uses all of her skills to make Harry a full fledged, sympathetic character in The Death Hallows. In earlier books Harry might have tried to quit, gotten angry and then whined quite a bit. But here, Harry shows he is growing up. He accepts that things are the way they are and he has to deal with them. He doesn't whine or complain, instead he tries to do what he thinks is right. In fact, Harry grows into a competent adult-like figure, who becomes quite a leader. His comprehension of events leads him to accept what he must do at Hogwarts to defeat Voldemort, and shows how much he is willing to sacrifice to save his friends.
For how well Rowling wrote Harry, the rest of the characters suffer in comparison. As The Deathly Hallows is basically the story of Harry, the rest of the cast gets less time devoted to them. Ron and Hermione are basically just along for the ride. Snape is barely in the book, and the ending to his story is quite abrupt, but we do learn where his loyalty lies. Voldemort really never rises above being just a bad guy that needs defeated. And Dumbledore gets quite a bit of attention via information dumps on his history. Here we get to see a side of Dumbledore that isn't even hinted at in the earlier books, and that I felt was put in solely to knock his reputation down a peg or two. With such a big book, I think a bit more could have been done with some of the other characters, even given the large cast used.
I mentioned the plodding pace earlier, and one other thing bothered me somewhat, and that is the use of 'magic' in the book. Perhaps I'm too grounded in science fiction, but the way magic is used seems to be at the whim of Rowling and without any internal logic. At one point, a magical 'alarm' is placed on the word 'Voldemort' (which is forbidden to be said), knowing that only Harry or his friends will say it. When they do, the Death Eater can quickly find them. Alright, why doesn't the resistance get people to say that as often as possible? There aren't an infinite number of Death Eaters, overuse of the word would quickly show the futility of doing this. And if you're going to 'alarm' one word, why not other words the resistance group might say? There is a pirate radio broadcast called Potterwatch run by people in the resistance. Why not alarm the word Potterwatch as well? And with the ease that Harry and his friends were able to use polyjuice potions and confusion spells to gain entry into heavily magically defended areas, whats the point of even trying to defend them? The magical system just bugged me.
And while the book isn't as light and 'magical' as the early Potter books are, I do think the ending leaves the series on a high note. We've seen Harry move from innocence and naivete into a competent, self-assured adult. And this change gives us hope for the future of Harry and of world Rowling has created. I'm not ready to anoint the Potter series, or this last book, as a 'classic', but I will say that Rowling has created a very enjoyable book and conclusion to Harry's story.
Share:
|
Discussion (8)
| PermaLink
| Posted by JP on Saturday July 28, 2007 - 1:49 PM
| Category: Book Review
| © 2007 SF Signal
And a parting video for you. A spoof of The Prisoner, done with stuffed animals. Behold, The Prisonbear.
Share:
|
Discussion (2)
| PermaLink
| Posted by JP on Saturday July 28, 2007 - 12:18 AM
| Category: LOST, Star Trek, TV, Tube Bits, Web Sites
| © 2007 SF Signal
Share:
|
Discussion (1)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Saturday July 28, 2007 - 12:05 AM
| Category: Tidbits
| © 2007 SF Signal
You probably already know, but, according to this article, Congress is concerned that too few American realize their older, analog TVs (i.e.- non-HD) will become giant paperweights on February 18, 2009. That's the date Congress has mandated that all over the air broadcast TV must be in digital High-Def, and all current analog signals must stop. That's in a little under two years from now, and many people don't know it's going to happen.
What I find crazy is the bureaucrats mandated this change and are now complaining that the networks aren't doing enough to educate the viewing public about the change. Also, what about all the people who can't afford to buy a new TV, let alone a cable connection or HD antenna? Those people are SOL and yet the government is trying to blame the networks.
You may be wondering why there is a mandate at all. You'd think the market would eventually sort through the process and HD would win in the end. Of course, the answer comes down to money. By shutting off access to the analog TV portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, the government can then auction parts of the spectrum off. This means big money for them, and big headaches for the rest of us.
I find this whole thing stupid in the extreme, and the whining from the congress critters about the networks really, really irritates me. They helped create this mess and now won't take part of the blame. Typical really. I try not to get political on this blog, as that's just asking for trouble. But this makes me wish the government was way smaller than it actually is and less influence on public life.
Anyway, consider this a heads up for anyone who didn't know about the switchover. You'll need to upgrade your TV to an HD set soon and you'll either have to buy an HD antenna or get an HD capable cable box. The only good news is that any network science fiction shows will be shown in HD. Which, as an avid LOST viewer, looks really sweet.
And if you have an HD set and get Universal HD, they are running Firefly on Saturday nights. In HD. Sweet.
Share:
|
Discussion (8)
| PermaLink
| Posted by JP on Friday July 27, 2007 - 7:48 PM
| Category: TV
| © 2007 SF Signal
Taking author John Scalzi up on his request to post about what I consider to be a most overrated work, I submit the movie E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial. Now I know many people consider this a great film and heartwarming and it certainly was popular. But I've never liked it. Most importantly, I thought it was a bad piece of science fiction with little even slightly plausible. The McGuyver-style phone home machine just capped it off for me as terrible. I saw it described as a dog movie - that is boy meets dog, boy names dog, boy grows up, etc. - and to a large part that's true. The alien doesn't have to be alien at all - it was developed based on Spielberg's childhood imaginary friend and it shows. The kids end up proving to be wiser than parents, and the dog runs away, er - E.T. goes home. Of course, my family loves the movie and I am ridiculed for my dislike.
As for the extra credit assignment (was there ever an effort that initially I disliked but then thought better of) I submit Fargo. I didn't care for it at all the first time I saw it in the theatre, but have since come to think of it as quirky and funny. I figure it was my state of mind on the day in question.
And as a side note, I too read Dune when I was about 12 and did not like it at all. I've often thought about rereading as an adult to see what I missed. Scalzi's comments encourage me to do so.
Share:
|
Discussion (19)
| PermaLink
| Posted by scottsh on Friday July 27, 2007 - 11:46 AM
| Category: Movies
| © 2007 SF Signal
Here's a trailer for the family-friendly superhero movie Sky High...remixed as a thriller.
WARNING: Major spoilers shown - if you haven't seen the movie and want to, look instead to the original Sky High trailer. Look at it anyway, it's got Bruce Campbell's "Sidekick" bit.
Share:
|
Discussion (3)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Friday July 27, 2007 - 12:25 AM
| Category: Movies
| © 2007 SF Signal
Share:
|
Discussion (6)
| PermaLink
| Posted by John on Friday July 27, 2007 - 12:15 AM
| Category: Tidbits
| © 2007 SF Signal
![]()