<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REVIEW: The Solaris Book of New Science Fiction, Volume 2 edited by George Mann</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/</link>
	<description>A science fiction blog featuring science fiction book reviews and with frequent ramblings on fantasy, computers and the web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:55:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/#comment-77489</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/#comment-77489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[:D

I just finished this collection last week and now after reading your review, I feel pretty much vindicated in my own opinions.

I definitely agree that Moorcock&#039;s piece was wasted space in this collection, having enjoyed so much of the others (although &quot;50 Dinosaurs&quot; was so odd and nightmare-ish I would have given up if not for Neal Asher&#039;s presence). Whatever flavor those two represented reminds me of some of the more nauseating Berty Bott&#039;s flavors (perhaps ear wax and boogie).

This anthology has led me to some new authors and series that I can&#039;t wait to read.

Thanks for the great review!

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://www.sfsignal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I just finished this collection last week and now after reading your review, I feel pretty much vindicated in my own opinions.</p>
<p>I definitely agree that Moorcock&#8217;s piece was wasted space in this collection, having enjoyed so much of the others (although &#8220;50 Dinosaurs&#8221; was so odd and nightmare-ish I would have given up if not for Neal Asher&#8217;s presence). Whatever flavor those two represented reminds me of some of the more nauseating Berty Bott&#8217;s flavors (perhaps ear wax and boogie).</p>
<p>This anthology has led me to some new authors and series that I can&#8217;t wait to read.</p>
<p>Thanks for the great review!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/#comment-77488</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/#comment-77488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the flattering words, Jim.  And just when I thought my head couldn&#039;t get any bigger... (H)

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the flattering words, Jim.  And just when I thought my head couldn&#8217;t get any bigger&#8230; (H)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/#comment-77487</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/#comment-77487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John: I read your &quot;On Reviewing Science Fiction&quot; I like to &quot;review&quot; SF/F books I read as well but not to the informed and entertaining way you do. I&#039;ve bought many books based on your reviews alone. Your book reviews are great:)

thanks

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John: I read your &#8220;On Reviewing Science Fiction&#8221; I like to &#8220;review&#8221; SF/F books I read as well but not to the informed and entertaining way you do. I&#8217;ve bought many books based on your reviews alone. Your book reviews are great:)</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Kiesche</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/#comment-77486</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Kiesche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/#comment-77486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark, like I said...Rumor Control. I&#039;m glad to get the word that the books are going to continue. Now I need to finish the collection (myself) and get a review up at TBG.

:^)

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, like I said&#8230;Rumor Control. I&#8217;m glad to get the word that the books are going to continue. Now I need to finish the collection (myself) and get a review up at TBG.</p>
<p>:^)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Tyson</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/#comment-77485</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Tyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/#comment-77485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you really dislike that one that much then yeah, you can probably pretty much skip Jerry Cornelius, I&#039;d suggest, barring the odd very different appearance like in The Distant Suns.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you really dislike that one that much then yeah, you can probably pretty much skip Jerry Cornelius, I&#8217;d suggest, barring the odd very different appearance like in The Distant Suns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Newton</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/#comment-77484</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/#comment-77484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Solaris and Black Library both continue the plan continue the plan of world domination!&quot;

However, we&#039;re that excited, my sentences occasionally descend into buffoonery.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Solaris and Black Library both continue the plan continue the plan of world domination!&#8221;</p>
<p>However, we&#8217;re that excited, my sentences occasionally descend into buffoonery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Newton</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/#comment-77483</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/#comment-77483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, that&#039;s news to us! :-P

BL Publishing trimmed our RPG imprint so we could concentrate on our hugely successful novel line. George Mann has been promoted to the top. Solaris and Black Library both continue the plan continue the plan of world domination!

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that&#8217;s news to us! <img src='http://www.sfsignal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>BL Publishing trimmed our RPG imprint so we could concentrate on our hugely successful novel line. George Mann has been promoted to the top. Solaris and Black Library both continue the plan continue the plan of world domination!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Kiesche</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/#comment-77482</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Kiesche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/#comment-77482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rumor Control has said that the Solaris line has been axed. I haven&#039;t been able to verify this. Anybody?

Seeing that I just picked up several of their books (including this one), I&#039;m hoping it is just a rumor!

:(

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumor Control has said that the Solaris line has been axed. I haven&#8217;t been able to verify this. Anybody?</p>
<p>Seeing that I just picked up several of their books (including this one), I&#8217;m hoping it is just a rumor!<br />
 <img src='http://www.sfsignal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/#comment-77481</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/#comment-77481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Jim: Check my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/002851.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;review policies&lt;/a&gt; where I describe ratings.  Basically 1/2/3/4/5 = bad/mediocre/good/very good/great.  Anything 3 and above is worth the read; missing a 2-star story is no big deal.  Less than 2 and you&#039;ll miss nothing by skipping it.  Overall, the anthology is worth the read, but each story supports that to varying degrees.

@ Derek: Agreed, though I imagine there are some folks - particularly those who read the Jerry Cornelius books - who might disagree.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jim: Check my <a href="http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/002851.html" rel="nofollow">review policies</a> where I describe ratings.  Basically 1/2/3/4/5 = bad/mediocre/good/very good/great.  Anything 3 and above is worth the read; missing a 2-star story is no big deal.  Less than 2 and you&#8217;ll miss nothing by skipping it.  Overall, the anthology is worth the read, but each story supports that to varying degrees.</p>
<p>@ Derek: Agreed, though I imagine there are some folks &#8211; particularly those who read the Jerry Cornelius books &#8211; who might disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/#comment-77480</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/#comment-77480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The inclusion of the (long) Moorcock story ruins an other wise excellent collection.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The inclusion of the (long) Moorcock story ruins an other wise excellent collection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/#comment-77479</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2008/04/review_the_solaris_book_of_new_science_fiction_volume_2_edited_by_george_mann/#comment-77479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Um, just curious, if you enjoyed the book so much why only give it a mediocre rating?:^)

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, just curious, if you enjoyed the book so much why only give it a mediocre rating?:^)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
