The 2009 Hugo Awards, honoring works first published in 2008 or works first published in 2008 in the US that were published in a previous year outside the US, have been announced:
(Story titles link to free, online versions.)
BEST NOVEL
BEST NOVELLA
BEST NOVELETTE
BEST SHORT STORY
BEST RELATED BOOK
BEST GRAPHIC STORY
BEST DRAMATIC PRESENTATION, LONG FORM
BEST DRAMATIC PRESENTATION, SHORT FORM
BEST EDITOR, SHORT FORM
BEST EDITOR, LONG FORM
BEST PROFESSIONAL ARTIST
BEST SEMIPROZINE
BEST FAN WRITER
BEST FANZINE
BEST FAN ARTIST
The John W. Campbell Award for Best New Writer
Congratulations to all the nominees!
See also: Past winners.
Comments (10)
| PermaLink
| Category: Awards
Posted by John DeNardo at Friday March 20, 2009 at 12:15 AM
© 2009 SF Signal
Have read all the nominated novels last year. A form of award nomination prediction...
Posted by Frank on Friday March 20, 2009 at 3:56 AM
3 YA titles? Is this what SF has come to?
Posted by Harris Yulin's Goatee on Friday March 20, 2009 at 10:37 AM
It would be nice (and helpful) to know what books the long form editor nominees were responsible for publishing during the nomination period.
3 YA titles? What's wrong with that?
Posted by Rob B on Friday March 20, 2009 at 1:37 PM
I meant to ask why is it a problem that 3 YA titles are on the novel list.
Posted by Rob B on Friday March 20, 2009 at 1:39 PM
Schlock Mercenary: The Body Politic is available online as well, at http://www.schlockmercenary.com/d/20070520.html (pdf link at the top of the page).
Posted by Bremen on Tuesday March 24, 2009 at 2:19 AM
A Scalzi and a Gaiman?!? Ah, where do my loyalties lie? Perhaps neither will win and I can be righteously indignant for the both of them.
I'd be happy for either, that is for sure!
Posted by Carl V. on Monday March 30, 2009 at 10:36 PM
The novel nominees this year seem really weak. Not because they are YA, far from it. It is just that I have read several and those I did not read i had a good reason not to want to read. Surely modern SF has better to offer? Surely there are more deservent candidates? This is a huge dissapointment.
Posted by General X on Sunday April 05, 2009 at 7:25 AM
Having just finished Stross' novel, Saturn's Children, I can assure anyone interested that this is an amazing book, very worthy of the nomination. Few authors can put together so many SF ideas with imaginative (and smart) plot and characters. The book is fun and allows the reader to speculate and think -- perhaps, the best attribute a Hugo nominee could aspire to.
The nature of the novel is no more sexual than many other novels -- it's a hard personality trait of the main character, but one that is the basis for a lot of intelligent character speculation -- so it would be a shame if the vague thought of the novel kept people away from it. Even more reason to elevate this book on the shelf.
Now, on to Stephenson. If anyone can top Stross, it's the man responsible for Snow Crash and The Diamond Age. Fun.
Posted by retrocog on Sunday June 21, 2009 at 1:28 PM
This is my first year as a Hugo voter. I had a lot of fun with it. I enjoyed reading through all the short stories, novlettes, and novellas that I normally wouldn’t have read otherwise. Overall my favorite is the Novella “Truth” by Robert Reed. I’ve never read Reed before, but I definitely plan to track down his work and see what else he has out there.
In the novel category I voted for Corey Doctorow’s Little Brother. As a software engineer I was relieved to finally see a group of hackers portrayed somewhat realistically. And it’s a good fast paced read. I don’t think it’ll win, perhaps it’s a bit too political. It may anger the political right. He uses straw man tactics to make his point. But if you can get past that it’s a good read.
Anathem was a close second for me. It’s a good book. If you like Stephenson’s other stuff, you’d like this too. If I were a gambling man I’d put my money on this novel to win this year. I think it’ll be well received by most SF readers.
I’m a big Scalzi fan and read all of the previous novels in the Old Man’s War series. It’s a great series, but Zoe’s Tale is by design unoriginal and predictable. 3 of the 4 books in the series were nominated for a hugo, so that’s a good indicator of it’s quality, but I expect Zoe’s Tale will fall short of the big award. I think Old Man’s War deserved a hugo, but didn’t read the book that actually beat that one out a few years ago.
The Graveyard Book is a charming kids story. I liked it as much as the other YA novels I’ve read, but I wouldn’t expect to be blown away if you’re going to read this one.
I rank Saturn’s Children last of the 5. Not that it’s a bad book, it’s worthy of a Nomination. It is based on a cool premise. I find Stross difficult read at times. Not really sure why.
Posted by Mark R. on Wednesday July 01, 2009 at 3:15 PM