News Ticker

MIND MELD: The Perfect SF/F/H Books to Give to People Who Don’t Read SF/F/H

We’ve talked before about Non-Genre Books for Genre Readers, now let’s take it in the opposite direction. We asked this week’s esteemed panelists:

Q: Which science fiction, fantasy, and/or horror books would you recommend to a friend who has never read them before?

Read on to see their answers, and be sure to let us know yours!

Brenda Cooper
Brenda Cooper is a technology professional, a science fiction and fantasy writer, and a futurist. Her recent books include the Endeavor award winning Silver Ship and The Sea and a sequel, Reading the Wind. See for more info, and for periodic reading recommendations.

Well, besides writing science fiction, I’m also a practicing futurist, which means I talk to business audiences about the future. Many people in those audiences have never heard of me as a writer and don’t read science fiction. But I recommend they start. I suggest Kim Stanley Robinson’s Science in the Capital series, which is about climate change. KSR does excellent research and climate change is a topic those audiences are usually interested in. I also recommend Vernor Vinge’s Rainbow’s End for near-future work, and his A Deepness in the Sky for more classic sf. Dune, by Frank Herbert, of course. For readers who like adventure, I often recommend Allen Steele’s Coyote and Coyote Rising. I like Nancy Kress’s work for accessibility and interest, and I think I’d also recommend Wake, a recent book by Robert Sawyer. Then there’s Connie Willis. My favorite is To Say Nothing of the Dog. I guess I’ll stop now…

For fantasy, I’d recommend anything by Charles deLint, but particularly Moonheart and The Mystery of Grace. Nina Kiriki Hoffman is a lovely fantasy writer. The Patricia Briggs Mercy Thompson books. I can’t count how many copies of Mercedes Lackey’s Magic’s Price series I’ve given to teenagers. And then there’s the dragonladys from Anne McCaffrey to Naomi Novik. Jay Lake’s Mainspring and and Ken Scholes’s Lamentation

I could list a lot more, but mostly they have to be books that speak in the common tongue instead of science fictionese, and which treat character as at least as important as the big idea and have an element of adventure in them.

James Wallace Harris
James Wallace Harris is a life-long science fiction fan. With Olivier Travers, he created in 1999 and he programmed the database system. Since the early days of the web, James has maintained The Classics of Science Fiction, which was based on his article from the fanzine Lan’s Lantern back in the 1980s. He quit SciFan to study fiction writing and he attended the Clarion West Writer’s Workshop in 2002. He now practices blog writing at Auxiliary Memory. James has been happily married for thirty years to his wife Susan. He works as a programmer and sys admin but dreams about space exploration and writing a SF 2.0 novel.

Genre literature, like science fiction, fantasy and horror, imprint on us when we are young, and if we don’t become fans then, I think it would be very strange to become addicted to these types of stories later in life, say after college. It’s almost impossible while growing up in our culture to avoid science fiction, fantasy and horror, but maybe a few have. More common are those hardcore fans that stick to their specific genre and refuse to read outside of it, for example the science fiction fan who sneers at any book with fairies or vampires.

Since I have a word limit, I shall stick with science fiction, my specialty, and try to think of science fiction books to recommend to people who turn up their nose at anything with robots and space ships on the covers. This is especially challenging when I think about all my friends who are completely blind and indifferent to the wonders of science.

Science fiction is so pervasive in our society that I can probably get anyone who likes to read to try a science fiction novel as long as it is character driven. Even my science hating friends loved WALL-E. But turning these people onto any novel that depends on having a sense of wonder for science would be a hard sale. What we need is a gentle approach with some simple goals.

To introduce new readers to science fiction really means finding readers whose minds dwell in the mundane and expand their consciousness to the far out ideas of space travel, robots, artificial intelligence, alien life forms, homo sapiens 2.0, and most of all, the immense concept of time. If I had a chance to seduce some science fictional virgins, I would slip one of these novels under their pillow:

  • The Naked Sun by Isaac Asimov
  • City by Clifford Simak
  • Childhood’s End by Arthur C. Clarke
  • Have Space Suit-Will Travel by Robert A. Heinlein
  • The Time Machine by H. G. Wells

However, I can’t believe even the Amish have been able to avoid all the main concepts of science fiction. I don’t think there are any science fictional virgins. The more interesting question is: Why do so many people chose to become science fictional atheists? The masses prefer CSI or Law & Order over Battlestar Galactica. Why is murder so much more appealing than sense of wonder?

Cherie Priest
Cherie Priest is the author of six novels, including the Blooker-award winning Four and Twenty Blackbirds, as well as Fathom, Wings to the Kingdom, and the Endeavour-award nominated book Not Flesh Nor Feathers from Tor. Her short novels Dreadful Skin and Those Who Went Remain There Still are published by Subterranean Press. Her next novel is Boneshaker, the first book in her trilogy The Clockwork Century. She lives in Seattle, Washington, with her husband and a fat black cat.

If I had such a friend, with zero interest in speculative fiction of any kind, I would very likely begin to expand his or her horizons by slipping Good Omens (Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman) under his or her nose. Then I’d chase that with Pratchett’s entire canon. I’d throw in a little Dan Simmons for the history fans who don’t yet know they’re going to totally love horror; and maybe I’d sneak some Joe Hill in front of the suspense fans who haven’t yet figured out that a mystery can have ghosts in it, sometimes, totally.

At least, that’s where I’d start.

John Ottinger III
John Ottinger III is the proprietor of the Science fiction and fantasy blog Grasping for the Wind. His reviews, interviews and articles have appeared in Publisher’s Weekly, The Fix, Sacramento Book Review, Flashing Swords, Stephen Hunt’s SFCrowsnest, Thaumatrope, and at

This is rather a difficult question to answer, as it depends on the personality of the friend, and their familiarity and/or experience with the genre. I’ve been trying to get my wife to read an SF book for years (she prefers Christian historical fiction) and have been quite unsuccessful. Recommendations are tricky business, but to recommend a few books to the others holding onto the elephant, here is what I would suggest:

Media tie-in novels. Yes, you read that right. MEDIA TIE-IN. Or at least, good media tie-in. I have found that a reader will read a book based on an SF or fantasy show or movie he or she likes, even if they generally would not read SF otherwise. But be sure to get a good writer of media tie-in novels. This takes a bit of research on your part. But if you check out the yearly International Association of Media Tie-In Writers’ Scribes Awards, you will usually get the cream of the crop. Though the awards are in all genres, SF/F/H usually makes a good showing.

If your particular friend is not a watcher of SF or fantasy shows or movies, then you will have to broaden your horizons a bit in coming up with recommendations. (I don’t mention horror in this list because I am sadly not very well read in that genre and so not qualified to make recommendations.)

Science Fiction:

  • Ender’s Game by Orson Scott Card. I used to be a teacher, and no single book intrigued high school boys as much as this novel. But this book in content, form, style, and tone, and appeals to many no matter their usual taste.
  • The Boat of a Million Years by Poul Anderson – This tale by a master of SF is broad in scope, as it covers a great deal of human history and then moves even beyond it to the future. That broad scope is its greatest attraction. It was one of the first SF books I ever read, and I’ve been hooked ever since.
  • Crystal Rain by Tobias Buckell – Perhaps a strange choice, but I think Buckell’s space opera is great fun and one I often recommend to new readers as a way to wet their feet in SF.
  • Old Man’s War by John Scalzi – For much the same reason as Buckell, especially with the added twist of humor Scalzi has. Old Man’s War is great for the same reason the Uncle John Bathroom Readers are great. They are easy reading, entertaining, funny, and a quick. This makes sense of course, as Scalzi is a contributor to those books and so knows how to write to appeal to a broad audience, even when writing in genre.


  • Redwall by Brian Jacques – Personified animals, mystery, action, and moles with a speech impediment make this one of my personal favorites and one I often recommend. In many ways, it is a Watership Down, with a modern voice, and hence more approachable. This recommendation comes from my former days as an educator. I had a student who despised reading and would rarely touch a book. After a look at his tastes, I recommended Redwall, and the kid hasn’t looked back since. He is a voracious reader now. The book appeals to more than just kids though, and I admit to continuing to read Brian Jacques even into the present day.
  • The Farseer Trilogy by Robin Hobb – I know this seems like an odd choice, but the recommendation comes from observation. I have a younger brother who is the typical entrepreneur who reads much more business and personal development type books than fiction. However, he loves Robin Hobb and has read all her works. If my brother, who normally avoids fiction, likes her works, and swallows them whole when he reads them, then that is high praise and reason enough for me to recommend them to non-SF readers.
  • Discworld by Terry Pratchett – Any Discworld novel is a good entry point to the universe of Pratchett, and Pratchett is a good entry point to fantasy. The humor and satire are the focal points of the story, the fantasy only providing the veneer of setting, and I have known many a non-reader of SF who read Pratchett, even if they read nothing else. My particular recommendations from the series would be Men at Arms, Going Postal, Mort, and The Truth.

These are books I consider good starting points for the non-reader, and books I have successfully recommended which got readers into the genre. Obviously some of the recommendations do depend on the tastes of the reader, but nonetheless, my recommendations are good novels that I have found have broad appeal.

Keith Brooke
Keith Brooke founded and edited Infinity Plus for ten years. His novels inlcude Genetopia and the The Accord (2009). Keith also writes regular reviews for The Guardian.

Tough question to answer… I’d be inclined to go for something like Robert Silverberg’s Dying Inside: an intensely human and impassioned story about loss and rediscovery that just happens to revolve around a science-fictional premise. But really, it would depend on that friend’s reading preferences – the answer would be very different depending on whether they like to read thrillers or romance, say, or action adventure entertainment, or lit’ry stuff. For a good intro to contemporary SF I’d be inclined to go for Robert Charles Wilson, or maybe Eric Brown’s Kethani stories; for big ideas about the world and society it’d have to be Kim Stanley Robinson; for that near-perfect balance between SFnal eyeball kicks and sensational prose it would be Ian McDonald.

Rodger Turner
Rodger Turner is the Publisher/Managing Editor of SF Site.

  • SF: Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson.
  • Fantasy: The Land of Laughs by Jonathan Carroll.
  • Horror: Song of Kali by Dan Simmons.

Jack McDevitt
Jack McDevitt is the author of fifteen novels, of which the most recent is The Devil’s Eye, from Ace. A new novel, Time Travelers Never Die, is coming in November. McDevitt has been a frequent Nebula finalist. He won for his 2006 novel, Seeker.

  • Famous Science Fiction Stories edited by Raymond J. Healy & J. Francis McComas
  • The Science Fiction Hall of Fame edited by Robert Silverberg
  • The Martian Chronicles by Ray Bradbury
  • The Midwich Cuckoos or Day of the Triffids or The Kraken Wakes by John Wyndham
  • October the First Is Too Late or The Black Cloud by Fred Hoyle
  • The Nine Billion Names of God by Arthur Clarke
  • Alas, Babylon by Pat Frank
  • Future History by Robert Heinlein
  • Rendezvous with Rama by Arthur Clarke
  • Timescape by Gregory Benford
Mindy Klasky
Mindy Klasky is the author of 9 novels and numerous short stories that span the speculative fiction continuum from grimy cyberpunk to fluffy paranormal romance. In her spare (?) time, she quilts, bakes, and tries to tame her endless to-be-read-shelf. Visit her website at

With regard to science fiction, I would recommend authors who focus on the sociological impact of science (figuring that books that are character-based and sociology-driven would *generally* be more accessible to readers who aren’t accustomed to hard-core science and who might be intimidated by the full-fledged hard science in some of our genre’s best works.) Sociology-driven SF does not have to be “dumbed down”; complex scientific and social issues can be explored in intriguing ways worthy of any new reader’s time. I’d point readers toward Octavia Butler’s Parable of the Sower series and Nancy Kress’s Beggars series. If I knew that the new reader was likely to enjoy grand, epic space travel with a touch of romance and an accessible sense of wonder, I’d hand them Sharon Lee and Steve Miller’s Liaden series.

With regard to fantasy, I would focus on authors who create richly-patterned worlds that are new or different or tangential to our existing, contemporary world. The sense of wonder associated with fantasy (at least in my mind) is often more accessible than that in science fiction; readers don’t need to be well-versed in particular academic disciplines like physics or biology. I’d point new genre readers toward Maria Snyder’s Study series to get a view of traditional fantasy and toward Jeri Smith-Ready’s vampire radio station series (starting with Wicked Game) for urban fantasy. (Both of these authors are relatively new to the field, and I think they have their respective fingers on the pulse of audience enjoyment.)

I’m not a big reader of horror, so I’m not qualified to make recommendations there. I can note, though, that as a non-horror reader, I was *captivated* by Joe Hill’s Heart-Shaped Box, a book that recently sparked my interest in a genre I’ve not explored in the past.

Mark Chadbourn
A two-time winner of the British Fantasy Award, Mark Chadbourn is the author of eleven novels and one non-fiction book. His current fantasy sequence, Kingdom of the Serpent, continued with The Burning Man in April 2008. A former journalist, he is now a screenwriter for BBC television drama. His other jobs have included running an independent record company, managing rock bands, and working on a production line. He lives in a forest in the English Midlands.

The trouble with genre readers is they’re all like Hannibal Lecter. They start off eating pizza like everyone else, but after a while that doesn’t excite their tastebuds any more so they move to more gourmet fare. Eventually even the white truffle sauces and Wagyu beef won’t do the job, and only human flesh will give that pure, rare dining sensation. One of the reasons I think SF has declined in sales is that there’s too much human flesh on offer, stories which cater for the increasingly jaded, highly specialised tastes of the regular genre reader, and not enough that means anything to anyone out in the real world. No way in, you see.

Which is probably by-the-by, but it was something on my mind while working out the criteria for this Mind Meld. In my other job as a TV writer, I’ve found that any story, any genre, will work with the mainstream viewer if there’s an affecting, human story at the core, a bit of honest emotion to nail down the wilder story ideas. That’s why the new Dr Who ended a near-twenty year SF drought on the BBC, and why BSG gets a major feature in The Guardian newspaper under the headline ‘As good as The Wire?’ This is genre fiction for real people.

So if I’m going to offer an SF/F/H book to people who don’t read those genres, I’m going to look for something with a good human story at its core, something that shines a light on the human condition. So for fantasy, forget the secondary world stuff: you need to have read Lord of the Rings at thirteen, or played Dungeons and Dragons, or probably both, to get ninety per cent of it. My fantasy for the non-fantasy reader would be Mythago Wood by Robert Holdstock. It takes the reader gently by the hand and guides them into an unfamiliar world, like stumbling through the wardrobe into Narnia. In this case, the wardrobe is Ryhope Wood in the Kentish countryside in England, a wood which is potentially infinite on the inside and contains the heart of all myth and legend. The sheer potency of the magic within Ryhope Wood is greater than you’ll find in most secondary world novels, but it becomes understandable and acceptable to a reader unfamiliar with fantasy because of the tale of love and loss and yearning that envelops it. You want to know about the lives of the central characters as much as you want to know about the fantasy world, and that’s the real key.

Stephen King is the true master of the “genre story for the non-genre” reader, which accounts for his massive sales during the eighties. He wasn’t writing for the genre reader, he was writing for the mainstream but with stories packed to the brim with genre. I could have chosen any one of half a dozen of his early novels, which all followed a pattern that worked well: set up the human story in the real-world environment, then move slowly into the fantastic horror. His stories end up seventy-five per cent real world, which then makes the collision with the unreal so much more powerful and affecting. I think I’ll plump for The Shining. It’s not a story about a haunted house; it’s a story about a deeply-flawed man who can see his dreams slipping through his fingers, and anyone can understand that.

For SF, I was torn between a couple of stories. The first, Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut, I wasn’t sure fit the spirit of the question, as it’s generally found on the literature shelves and not on the SF ones. In the end I went for Earth Abides by George R. Stewart, which fit my criteria of an affecting human story to anchor the ideas. The story of Isherwood Williams helping to rebuild the world after a disaster looks at what it means to be human from many different angles. It is also, I think, a great way in to SF by showcasing the genre’s strengths and encouraging the reader to go on to read deeper.

Shaun Duke
Shaun Duke is a modern literature student with a focus in speculative fiction. He is currently working on a research project for the University of California, Santa Cruz that focuses on the human/other in science fiction film. He also writes science fiction and fantasy with the hope to be published one day. He blogs at The World in the Satin Bag.

The big problem with recommending genre books for readers who either intentionally do not read genre or deny that they do, even when some of the books they have read clearly fit into the speculative fiction rubric, is understanding that the reading mentality in these individuals is different from people who actively and avidly read speculative fiction. It would be foolish for anyone to tell a fan of Salman Rushdie that a good starting place would be Isaac Asimov. There’s a reason why non-genre readers refuse to read genre fiction and it tends to be because they dislike the flashy staples of the genre (spaceships, elves, alien invasions, Star Trek, Star Wars, magic swords, etc.).

With that in mind, I would never recommend a non-genre reader to start with the science fiction or fantasy “canon,” because that is a surefire way to ruin genre for them indefinitely (and it should be noted that the kinds of books you recommend should be based on the preferences of an individual, which makes recommending books even more difficult if you don’t have that information beforehand; thus a person who only reads romances is likely not going to like a military science fiction, but a person who loved military fiction might; but for the purposes of this response, I think it would be fair to assume we’re dealing with someone who only reads what is considered to be “real literature”).

A good place to start, I think is with some of the more prominent social science fiction writers, specifically Octavia Butler’s Parable of the Sower and Margaret Atwood’s various works. You could certainly toss some Samuel R. Delany in there to mix things up. I think Parable of the Sower would certainly be a good introductory novel depending on whether the non-genre reader enjoys some of the classic dystopian works such as 1984 by George Orwell or Brave New World by Aldous Huxley (and even Utopia by Thomas More). We by Yevgeny Zamyatin would also be a great addition to the dystopian “canon,” and anyone who enjoyed 1984 should be familiar with it, as it acted as a precursor to Orwell’s influential novel.

Other good starters:

  • Ursula K. LeGuin (The Dispossessed or one of her other non-fantasy novels, which puts little attention on the flashy science fiction elements, and more on the social aspects of diametrically opposed “utopian” societies)
  • The Road by Cormac McCarthy
  • Jo Walton’s Farthing and Ha’Penny (and Half a Crown, though I haven’t read it; all are part of an alternate history that even non-genre folks should enjoy)
  • Black No More by George Schuyler (social commentary on race issues with a science fictional element, all disguised as “literature”)
  • One For Sorrow by Christopher Barzak (barely “fantasy”)
  • Spaceman Blues by Brian Francis Slattery (highly “literary” in style)
  • Works by Zoran Zivkovic (Seven Touches of Music and Steps Through the Mist)
  • The Steam Magnate by Dana Copithorne

If you really wanted to push it, you could recommend some of Philip K. Dick’s more prominent novels, such as Ubik, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, and Man in the High Castle, but again, that would be pushing the envelope and flirting with that line between getting someone to actually read genre fiction and getting them to hate it even more.

Genre fans need to understand that what we find enjoyable in literature does not necessarily apply to people who openly avoid science fiction, fantasy, or horror. Probably the best way to break through to these folks is to understand what they are already reading and pointing out where fantasy and science fiction has already slipped into their favorite books. Someone who read Salman Rushdie may be surprised to find that he writes some very obvious fantasies, and even today we’re seeing science fiction and fantasy worm their way into practically every other genre of literature out there, from romance and westerns to “literary fiction” (or that lovely section in Borders that says “literature,” as if such a title actually means anything in a book store).

Mark Chitty
Mark Chitty lives in Caernarfon, North Wales with his wife, Jane, and hyperactive cocker spaniel, Snoop. He has the exciting job of dealing with students on a day to day basis at Bangor University but escapes the real world whenever possible to read and blog about science fiction at Walker of Worlds.

I stumbled into the world of genre novel with Pandora’s Star by Peter F Hamilton back in 2004 – it hooked me and gave me a thirst for all things SF. I’ve discovered since then that multi-volume, multi-perspective, brick sized door stoppers are not the easiest introduction to the genre. Hell, it puts off people that read in the genre.

So what to suggest? Luckily enough I’ve been fortunate to read a lot of SF since then and have found that some of the best reads are the shorter, lighter novels. I think one of the first that comes to mind is John Scalzi’s Old Man’s War – it’s a great, quick read that has equal amounts of set-up, world-building and action, plus the writing is addictive, funny and gets the pages turning very quickly.

Space Opera is my preferred sub-genre and as such I would have to recommend something that is representative of it. Hyperion by Dan Simmons is one of the best novels in SF, period. Simmons is very much a literary writer and Hyperion is an excellent first step into genre reading. The follow ups are also great and by reading the four books it will give an excellent representation to the reader of what SF has to offer.

Neal Asher is another that could be a stepping stone into SF with his weird and wonderful alien creations. The Skinner is one of his lighter sci-fi novels while his Cormac books throw you into the action with some solid storytelling. There really is nobody else out there that can create an alien ecology as good as him.

A last recommendation would be The Sparrow by Mary Doria Russell. This is a first contact science fiction novel that tends to be looked upon as a piece of literary work rather than a genre novel. It certainly has all the ingredients for both and gives a religious take on meeting an alien civilisation. Definitely one for the literary reader who hasn’t ventured into SF before.

Eugie Foster
Eugie Foster calls home a mildly haunted, fey-infested house in Metro Atlanta that she shares with her husband, Matthew, and her pet skunk, Hobkin. Her publication credits number over 100 and include stories in Realms of Fantasy, Interzone, Cricket, Orson Scott Card’s InterGalactic Medicine Show, Jim Baen’s Universe, and anthologies Best New Fantasy (Prime Books), Heroes in Training (DAW Books), and Best New Romantic Fantasy 2 (Juno Books). Her short story collection, Returning My Sister’s Face and Other Far Eastern Tales of Whimsy and Malice, is now available from Norilana Books. Visit her online at

In my experience, the primary reason that intelligent, literate people avoid speculative fiction is its ghettoized reputation paired with a misunderstanding of its scope and depth–the perception that genre fiction is vacuous and aimed at the sensibilities and tastes of teenage boys (and now, tween girls). It remains a pervasive belief that science fiction is exclusively ray gun space operas, fantasy is elves and unicorns, and horror is vampires and werewolves. And even though there can be thoughtful discourse presented alongside ray guns, insightful commentary made with unicorns, and meaningful observations expressed with vampires, anything that smacks too obviously of those tropes tend not to be well received.

I also think it’s important when recommending genre works to non-genre readers to remember that what longtime genre fans may consider as a basic tenet-unto-painful-cliché ingrained in the cultural consciousness may be utterly foreign to their friends who’ve never delved into genre fiction. Once I overheard a conversation between a couple moviegoers who were confused by Underworld because they didn’t understand that vampires are traditionally unable to withstand sunlight or the connection between werewolves and the full moon.

So for readers who have always veered away from SF/F/H but who are open to reconsidering and reassessing their assumptions, I’d point them to George Orwell’s Animal Farm and 1984, Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale, and Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse-Five. These books, in addition to being masterfully written and engaging, provide thoughtful and insightful commentary about society and the human condition. They’re typically not marketed as genre even though they possess resoundingly genre elements–talking animals in Animal Farm, aliens and time travel in Slaughterhouse-Five, etc.–so they serve to weaken the boundaries and misconceptions of what genre is while remaining accessible to readers who aren’t familiar with genre tropes. They also address adult subject matter (e.g., censorship in Fahrenheit 451, feminist issues in The Handmaid’s Tale, etc.), which further serves to stretch genre beyond its juvenile roots.

About John DeNardo (13012 Articles)
John DeNardo is the Managing Editor at SF Signal and a columnist at Kirkus Reviews. He also likes bagels. So there.

32 Comments on MIND MELD: The Perfect SF/F/H Books to Give to People Who Don’t Read SF/F/H

  1. I always start my recommendations with Scalzi’s “Old Man’s War.” That has to the the most enjoyable, but accesible, sci-fi I’ve ever read. 

  2. weyland yutani // May 20, 2009 at 1:10 am //

    Snow Crash changed my life.   It led me into cyberpunk, which led me to PKD and Asimov, at which point, there was no turning back.  

    In the same manner, I’ve recommended Richard K. Morgan’s Altered Carbon and/or Market Forces with much success.  Neal Asher’s Cormac (Gridlinked, etc) books offer a wide variety of SF concepts that are laid out in a very accessible manner — exciting books with great characters, bots, creatures, environments, and tech.  Before you know it, you are in the SF boat.

  3. I think Christopher Priest should really be mentioned here, particularly The Extremes and The Prestige. He’s absolutely one of our best writers inside and out of the genre in the UK. I would also suggest the earlier works of JG Ballard, either the collection The Terminal Beach or the novel The Drowned World. All of the above would be highly accessible should a non-genre reader be inclined towards more literary material.

  4. Eric Gregory // May 20, 2009 at 7:44 am //

    China Mountain Zhang and Old Man’s War, for totally different reasons. OMW is eminently readable, likable, accessible; I’ve handed it out a dozen times, never to anything less than raves. CMZ plays out the cadences of its characters’ lives in a way that is wise and natural and beautifully humanistic — it’ll appeal particularly to readers more accustomed to (non-SFnal) literary fiction.

  5. I have to say, it is posts like THIS that keep me coming back to SF Signal. Thanks!

  6. Charlie Stross’ Accelerando is an excellent vision of the upcoming Internet society and also the singularity. 

  7. This came across as a very good, concise list of books.  I’ve heard many of these recommended before, but having a single source recommend them all is really comforting.  I’ll be trying out several in the coming months, you can bet on that.

    Thank you!


    Terry Tibke

    Armageddon – The Battle of Darkening Skies

  8. Jeff VanderMeer // May 20, 2009 at 9:27 am //

    Readers who haven’t read SF/F aren’t monolithic, but you could probably at least divide them into those who read more commercial fiction and more literary fiction. Even in that division you’ll find readers who read both, of course, but it does speak to how you’d need to custom-fit the recommendations for different types of non-SF/F readers. If they read airport thrillers and whatnot, then that’s one set of recommendations. If they read Atwood, etc., then it’s a different set of recommendations. I’m not sure if the SF/F world always has a good sense of this–that it’s not so much “SF/F” versus not-“SF/F” but commercial versus literary (except, of course, that these boundaries too get blurred by particular books and particular authors).

  9. Bridge of Birds, by Barry Hughart.

  10. I recommend SF to non-SF readers all the time, and the way I go about it is, before making any recommendations, I ask the person in question what kind of books they do read, and – and this is usually more helpful – what kind of films they like. I’m talking non-genre works. If they like police procedural and military films, I’m going to recommend one type of SF book. If they like technothrillers and spy movies, another. If they like comedies, romance, deep dramas or light action, that’s all going to change what I will recommend. I don’t ever assume one book is for all readers, but try and triangulate their tastes this way and then come in with something similar.

  11. I should add to that that I talk to a surprising number of non-SF readers who love Mike Resnick. And my own brother, who reads a lot of fantasy but very little SF, picked up an Asimov’s magazine, read the Resnick story in it, was so impressed he subscribed for a year, but dropped the subscription the next year because the only other story he liked in it in all that time was the next Resnick appearance. His collected Kirinyaga stories rank as one of my all-time favorite works in the genre, and the African-seeming setting and easy storytelling style makes for a good entry point for those new to SF.

  12. The thing that always bothers me about SF recommendations is that old books, Asimov, Heinlein, Bradbury, etc., are are inevitably included.  Then everyone wonders why younger readers aren’t reading SF.  Younger readers for the most part don’t fall in love with the classics they read in English class, so why should they fall in love with SF classics?  The majority want something that feels like it was influenzed by what has influenced them growing up.  Thus, though it is a movie, the succesful Star Trek reboot.


  13. Chad – yes!

    I was in B&N last year when I ran into an old highschool buddy with his daughter (young teen). He said she was assigned Fahrenheit 451 to read.I turned to her immediately and said, “I am so sorry. You are going to hate it. It is about an old man bitching that his wife watches too much television. Nothing happens in it, and it will bore you silly. Please, please, please don’t think that that is what my genre is all about and what I do for a living. Come with me.”

    And then I lead her to where there was a big end cap display of Scott Westerfeld’s Uglies books. I pointed and said, “Read this, you’ll love it.”

    I bumped into them a month later at the same B&N. My friend told me, “You were right. She couldn’t stand Fahrenheit 451 and got the Cliff notes, but she loved Uglies and now we’re here for the third book in the series.”

    One teenager saved from never picking up another SF book.

  14. Steven H Silver // May 20, 2009 at 3:24 pm //

    I have found James Morrow’s <i>Towing Jehovah</i> to be a very successful gateway drug for speculative fiction.

  15. Excellent post! Such fun reading everyone’s essays.

    a person who only reads romances is likely not going to like a military science fiction

    Oh, I’d like to introduce that romance reader to THE OUTBACK STARS, THE STARS DOWN UNDER, and THE STARS BLUE YONDER by Sandra McDonald. I had the privilege of reading an advanced copy of the third book in the trilogy and wow was the romance just full of awesomesauce.

    Here are a few suggestions for romance readers wanting to try SF by way of stories with a romance:

    HOPE’S FOLLY by Linnea Sinclair

    MOONSTRUCK by Susan Grant

    BEYOND THE RAIN (August 2009) by Jess Granger

    SHARDS OF HONOR by Lois McMaster Bujold

    CLOSE ENCOUNTERS by Katherine Allred

    STARJACKED by Karin Shah

    and for the m/m fans, INTERSTITIAL by Ann Somerville

    SUNRISE ALLEY & ALPHA by Catherine Asaro

    GRIMSPACE by Ann Aguirre

  16. Smoking Robot // May 20, 2009 at 8:18 pm //

    ‘Old Man’s War’.    Absolutely.   Maybe some Larry Niven.   Maybe some Isaac Asimov – not a great writer, but he wrote very entertaining stories.   Getting them hooked on Robot detectives and Galactic Empires is a great way to bring newbies into scifi.  

  17. I agree that the preferences of the intended, er, “inductee” into spec fic must be taken into consideration. I’ve learned, for instance, that my wife simply cannot read a story, no matter how brilliant the prose, where the main character has a “weak” personality: an extended interior monologue where the lead bemoans his or her situation, perceived faults or (worse) lack of current romantic entanglements is a sure-fire way to make her close the book. So far my most well-received recommendation has been Jim Butcher’s Dresden Files series (which she has devoured to the point that she has now read more of the books than I have). Other hits have been Ender’s Game, and Lois McMaster Bujold’s Curse of Chalion. I’m trying to get her into Bujold’s Vorkosigan series now with Cordelia’s Honor… Here’s hoping.

  18. For science fiction, I’ve usually had good results starting people off with Bradbury’s The Martian Chronicles or Quicker Than The Eye, or Adams’ The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. I’d also start someone off with Rob Sawyer’s Flash Forward (especially timely, given the upcoming TV series) or Robert Charles Wilson’s Spin.

    On the fantasy side, you can’t go wrong with Peter S Beagle’s The Last Unicorn, or for something edgier, Patrick Rothfuss’ The Name of the Wind, or if the person would be more interested in a modern setting, Trader or Forests of the Heart by Charles de Lint (although if you read too much de Lint, every story starts sounding the same after a while).


  19. @ Lou Anders

    I’m glad someone agrees.  I think this is a huge problem with reading in general.  When your main reading experiences, as a teen, are reading boring assed text books and boring “classic” literature, it’s unlikely you will read much as an adult.

    About, a year ago, I thought I would read Slaughter House Five.  It was supposed to be good, a “classsic” and all, and have this great meaning with in the book.  Well, it had neither for me.  Oh, it was obviously making a statement on war, but I didn’t care.  It’s not like the anti-war sentiment was anything new and I certainly didn’t care about the main character.  Yet, we jam stuff like this and 451 down kids throats and wonder why they don’t read.

    Literature is for about 3% of the population.  The rest of the population just wants fun and entertaining writing.  I don’t read novels to admire the prose or get a message.  If both of those can be worked into an entertaining story, great.  However, the entertaining story is the prime motivator. 

    Also, just because something is first or in the “golden age”, does not mean it is good.  Sure Asimov, Heinlein, and Wells were ground breaking at the time.  However, those stories seem rather old, slow, and quaint when compared to everything that has come since. 

  20. Wow — what great suggestions! Just a few quick thoughts …

    I think Mark Chadbourn has it right when he talks about genre vs. non-genre readers. He makes some very good points there.

    Several people recommended Octavia Butler – she’s been on my list for a while and is definitely getting bumped closer to the top now.

    Mark Chitty recommends The Sparrow, but I’d say that you need to include the follow up book Children of God along with it. For me, the first book was almost like a prologue to the 2nd, which I enjoyed much more. But then again, I already LIKE genre stuff so I’m not the intended audience. 🙂

    PS. This is my first time here – I followed from John Ottinger, III’s blog – but I will definitely be back.

  21. The Swarm by Frank Schaetzing. A very exciting thriller with a large cast of strong characters. People read this and like it and don’t even realize that it’s SF. You point it out to them and they will be willing to read more SF.

  22. @ Chad.

    With you most of the way. If I could, I’d get Asimov off the shelves, or at least have the shelf presence reduced. I meet so many people who, when I ask them if they read SF, say they “tried it once.” Inevitably, what they did is they went into the bookstore, started in the A’s, recognized Asimov’s name as something they’d heard of, bought a paperback, started reading it, found it stilted and decades away from being relevant to them, and put it down figuring they’d done SF and found it wasn’t for them.

  23. I’ve been reading SF on and off  (more on then off) since I was 12 years old and I can only say Clifford D. Simak. Get thee self to EBay find and buy City, Time and Again, Highway to Eternity, Project Pope and many more. Robert J. Sawyer, Clarke, Webber, CJ Cherryh Greenwood all great but nothing beats Simak hands down. Simak, Simak, Simak! thave I said Simak enough yet? Oops my bad 

  24. I find it odd how many people, when given this topic, include books that really just happen to be their own favorite sf. I mean, Asimov, Clarke, Niven, Scalzi, etc. are all talented story-spinners. But if a person is turned off by what they expect sf to be, then those are really the last authors to give them. Same thing with Peter Beagle or even DeLint, though he’d have a good chance of winning romance-novel fans.

    Other people try to use the crossover literary author as the gateway. Margaret Atwood, and Cormac McCarthy are great authors. But I doubt they win many people over to the genres they play with. That’s because when people read a literary author that writes a good genre book they are more likely to figure that a good writer has made something great out of an otherwise mediocre genre than to wonder if more genre-specific authors might not be doing something equally good, or even better, in the same genre.

    The approach that I recommend is most likely to work is to use genre-identified authors’ work that borders on readers’ normal expectations. For mature adult readers, try sneaking them Graham Joyce’s new book Stormwatchers. It’s gothic, creepy and sexy and as well-written as anything by Atwood and McCarthy. If that wins them over, suggest they try The Tooth Fairy or Indigo. If a person likes Fowler’s Jane Austen Book Club or Lethem’s Motherless Brooklyn, they might be surprised to know that both authors started out as genre writers; get them to try out Sarah Canary and Gun with Occasional Music. When people talk about genre books for non-genre readers, the goal is not just to find a genre book that a non-genre reader will like. The goal is to win converts, that is people who will wander from the literary fiction aisle of B&N to the Fantasy & Sci-Fi section. These authors can end up in either location, which can lead to exactly the kind of migration we’re looking for.

  25. Chad/Lou;  I’ve got a counter story for you:  I was talking with the son of a friend who was also assigned Bradbury’s ‘451’ for school and I asked him what he thought about it.  He loved it – even mentioned finding it appropriate to our times, finding book burning synonymous with the intrusions of Homeland Security (pretty smart kid!).  He’d already picked up Martian Chronicles on his own and was looking for more “classic” SF – did I think he should try Asimov or Clarke next…?

    If you tell a kid that the book is a boring old POS, they’re either going to see it as a POS – or they’re going to force themselves to like it just because you said it was a POS. 

    I was “forced” to read Dickens and Shakespeare and Bronte and Melville &c: some I’ve gone back to, some I want nothing to do with, but none of them turned me off to trying something ‘new’ (be it from the 1600s or yesterday).

    It has nothing to do with the subject matter or the genre and everything to do with the presentation and the support new readers receive.  We don’t need to be downing someone else’s work in the pursuit of promoting reading – we need to be creating enthusiastic bibliophiles who are willing to try anything and give it a fair shake in the process.

  26.  I agree with Mark re: <i>The Sparrow</i>.  I’ve had great success introducing that book, as well as Audrey Niffenegger’s <i>The Time Traveler’s Wife</i> and Ken Grimwood’s <i>Replay</i> into non-genre book clubs.

    I can’t imagine trying to start someone out on Asimov or Heinlein.  Ugh!  I still love some of them, but I see a lot more flaws now that I’m grown up than I did when I was a teenager.

  27. “My Soul to Keep” by Tananarive Due

    “Mama Day” and “Bailey’s Cafe” by Gloria Naylor

    and “The Intuitionist” by Colson Whitehead.

    Sometimes the reasons why readers avoid the speculative is the perception of its one-dimensionality and failure to embrace a diversity of cultures. Yet the speculative can be found almost everywhere and can be as interesting and as deep as anything produced in mainstream fiction. Sometimes, even more so. Check out some of these titles. They are wonderful.

  28. @ Steve

    I agree with you on two points; forced reading choices are bad and labeling something bad isn’t the way to go. 

    That being said, forced reading of specific books in school isn’t going away, so, unfortunately, books have to be selected.  With that in mind my previous argument against the “classics” holds.  I am not saying there aren’t some people that like them, nor do I think the ones that do are more or less intelligent.  I am saying the percentage of people that like the “classics” will be lower than the percentage of people that would like something closer to current style. 

    Also, “classics” do not have a stranglehold on social commentary.  There are plenty of current books with good social commentary written in a more current style.  Amazingly enough, some of these more current novels even have a fun story to read. 

    Instead of having only 1 person out of 20 student class enjoy a book like 451, maybe 2-4 people enjoy a more current book.  If even 1 more person out of every 20 finds they actually enjoy reading the number of readers would increase dramatically. 

    I’m not against all “classics”, just the “classics” that can’t meet the above criteria.  A good example, though not an SF book, is anything by Mark Twain.  Sure, he uses a few words in a manner not used today, but his overall writing style isn’t ridiculously different than today.  Plus, he gives social commentary and tells a fun story.  It’s a win-win.

  29. For urban fantasy, I’ll recommend “Red-Headed Stepchild”: by Jaye Wells. In YA sci-fi, how about “The Free Lunch” by Spider Robinson.

  30. I have always loved a great story with historical depth. One that I’ve stumbled upon recently is Luthiel’s Song by Robert Fanney. Couldn’t put either of his first two books down. They were very well crafted and I liked his take on good and evil.

  31. I’m thinking everybody missed out on a few of the oldies that got [b]me[/b] hooked hard.


    [b]Mutant[/b] by Harry Kuttner.

    [b]Space Viking[/b] by H. Beam Piper.

    [b]The Complete Fuzzy[/b] by H. Beam Piper.

    [b]Star Of Danger[/b] by Marion Zimmer Bradley.


    I [b]am[/b] happy to see Cordwainer Smith on the lists of the ‘Top 100/200 Sci Fi Books’, but not too many of the Old Great Ones really made the list…

  32. Robin Hobb is a good addition to the list.  Her setting is a human-centric world with no high-magic.  What passes for magic is more akin to poorly understood psychic powers, and while they are critical to the story, are not drilled relentlessly.  Her writing is fluid with a healthy balance of articulate scene-setting and plot moving conversation.  She does not, like many unfortunate modern fantasy writers, waste pages with petty meandering dialog or rambling historical and visual descriptions (in an effort to seem more Tolkienesque?).

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: