[UPDATED] Vote for SF Signal and Watch Our Heads Explode!
SF Signal is currently in the running at Critters Workshop’s Preditors & Editors Readers’ Poll in the category of Best Nonfiction e-zine. Every time someone votes for us our heads swell a little. If enough people vote, they’ll explode. What more incentive do you need to go vote?
SF Signal contributor Lucien Spelman is also in the running for the Joe Abercrombie interview we published. I’m not sure if there is a connection between the Nonfiction article category and Lucien’s head. But you can vote for him to find out.
[UPDATE] But wait! There’s more! Another SF Signal contributor (they’re crawling out of the woodwork, folks), Pete Tzinski, is also in the running for his 2-part article on Why the Star Wars Prequels Are Actually Good. Pete actually has a button on his neck that will make his head explode, but he promises to press it if he wins so, if so inclined, you can vote for him as well.
[UPDATE #2] There’s still more. Another SF Signal contributor, Larry Ketchersid, is running in the novel category with his book Software by the Kilo. More head explosions!
Related posts:
- Poll Snafu! If you already Voted This Week, Please Re-Vote
- Reader’s Choice: Vote For Your Favorite Books of the Year
- James Cameron Poll Was Broken – Please Re-Vote
- We’re Back! From Spaaaaaaace! (Updated!)
- SF Signal Nominated for KBCafe Blog Awards
Filed under: Meta
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
SF Signal is listed! Lucien is listed! I’m listed (for my Star Wars Prequel articles that everyone ADORED)!
Really, everyone who is sexy and awesome is listed!
I missed that. Post updated. Good luck!
Voted.
Bonne chance!
Hmmm. Wouldn’t it be cool if SF Signal swept the awards? Cleaned up on web-site, articles, novels, short stories, etc?
Remember folks: if you don’t vote for SF Signal-related people…well, the terrorists have already won.
First off let me say that I love this website and come here several times a week.
I normally really enjoy visiting but not today. That image above is in poor taste and I find it offensive. I know that this is the result of people going to a wesbite to vote and the desire is to get this to happen. I can thus avoid going to that website. I wish I would have not been forced to see it here on your website though. I would rather you posted a graphic warning over it and made people click on it if they wanted to see it.
I often steer people to this website for numerous great articles and am proud to do so. Today I’m disappointed in the management of the website for letting that graphic of a picture be forced on me the moment I visited the site.
I hope this is not a trend. Please in the future make these type of violent images a link people must click onto to see.
Thank you for listening to my feedback,
- Jeff
Thanks for the plug, gents. SFSignal has already risen to #1; my novel, Software by the Kilo, is up in the top ten. Don’t cha kjust love free marketing?
I agree with Jeff!
the picture doesn’t phase me any (but I can understand why it might bother some). But I keep staring at it, trying to remember where the heck it’s FROM. Why does it look so familiar? Have I REALLY seen so many exploding heads that I can’t remember where I saw this one? Is this the gentle slope of dementia, claiming me at last?
Addendum to my last comment:
1) we should not be surprised that googling “movie head explode” brings us LOLcats.
and
2) The film was Scanners.
Now-knowing, I can relax.