<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The SF Signal Podcast (Episode 100): Sword &amp; Sorcery Panel, Part 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2011/12/the_sf_signal_podcast_episode_100_sword_sorcery_panel_part_3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2011/12/the_sf_signal_podcast_episode_100_sword_sorcery_panel_part_3/</link>
	<description>A science fiction blog featuring science fiction book reviews and with frequent ramblings on fantasy, computers and the web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 05:10:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason M Waltz</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2011/12/the_sf_signal_podcast_episode_100_sword_sorcery_panel_part_3/#comment-96157</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason M Waltz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 21:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2011/12/the_sf_signal_podcast_episode_100_sword_sorcery_panel_part_3/#comment-96157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds good to me, Lou. I think Scott&#039;s 2nd book RED SEAS UNDER RED SKIES not only could have been included, it&#039;s one of the best hero duo stories written in my opinion. Perhaps WFC 2012 will offer the opportunity to record part two. Jaym? ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds good to me, Lou. I think Scott&#8217;s 2nd book RED SEAS UNDER RED SKIES not only could have been included, it&#8217;s one of the best hero duo stories written in my opinion. Perhaps WFC 2012 will offer the opportunity to record part two. Jaym? <img src='http://www.sfsignal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Anders</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2011/12/the_sf_signal_podcast_episode_100_sword_sorcery_panel_part_3/#comment-95778</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Anders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2011/12/the_sf_signal_podcast_episode_100_sword_sorcery_panel_part_3/#comment-95778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;This was a great podcast, but I can&#039;t believe that Scott Lynch wasn&#039;t even mentioned in the (too short) list of modern practicioners. I really want a part two to this, restricted to discussions of contemporary/current S&amp;S writers, panelists comprised of same.&lt;/p&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a great podcast, but I can&#8217;t believe that Scott Lynch wasn&#8217;t even mentioned in the (too short) list of modern practicioners. I really want a part two to this, restricted to discussions of contemporary/current S&amp;S writers, panelists comprised of same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul (@princejvstin)</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2011/12/the_sf_signal_podcast_episode_100_sword_sorcery_panel_part_3/#comment-95777</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul (@princejvstin)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2011/12/the_sf_signal_podcast_episode_100_sword_sorcery_panel_part_3/#comment-95777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Kudos to Patrick, Jaym and this massive panel.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have no chance at pulling out individual comments on this, except that I heartily recommend the entirety of this three part podcast to anyone remotely interested in fantasy.&lt;/p&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos to Patrick, Jaym and this massive panel.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I have no chance at pulling out individual comments on this, except that I heartily recommend the entirety of this three part podcast to anyone remotely interested in fantasy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TW</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2011/12/the_sf_signal_podcast_episode_100_sword_sorcery_panel_part_3/#comment-95776</link>
		<dc:creator>TW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2011/12/the_sf_signal_podcast_episode_100_sword_sorcery_panel_part_3/#comment-95776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Nice discussion, but the next time I hear somebody say &quot;I haven&#039;t read that, but I think (usually something derogatory)&quot;, I am going to scream.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;IO Saturnalia&lt;/p&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice discussion, but the next time I hear somebody say &#8220;I haven&#8217;t read that, but I think (usually something derogatory)&#8221;, I am going to scream.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>IO Saturnalia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Holder</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2011/12/the_sf_signal_podcast_episode_100_sword_sorcery_panel_part_3/#comment-95775</link>
		<dc:creator>James Holder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.sfsignal.com/archives/2011/12/the_sf_signal_podcast_episode_100_sword_sorcery_panel_part_3/#comment-95775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Good end to the panel discussion.&#160;&lt;/p&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good end to the panel discussion.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
