<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [GUEST POST] Helen Lowe Asks: Do We Need To Make Epic Fantasy New?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2012/01/guest-post-helen-lowe-asks-do-we-need-to-make-epic-fantasy-new/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2012/01/guest-post-helen-lowe-asks-do-we-need-to-make-epic-fantasy-new/</link>
	<description>A science fiction blog featuring science fiction book reviews and with frequent ramblings on fantasy, computers and the web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:46:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen Lowe</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2012/01/guest-post-helen-lowe-asks-do-we-need-to-make-epic-fantasy-new/#comment-98384</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen Lowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsignal.com/?p=48606#comment-98384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think there can be both outstanding and poor examples of any genre, and that just because each genre has its tropes doesn&#039;t mean we should get away with treating them as a &#039;formula.&#039; I find I look mainly to the world building and the characters--the new and the freshness, as well as the depth to the storytelling, can really come in there, even if there is a &#039;quest&#039; (ie &#039;problem to be solved/resolved--I mean, go figure!), or a band of buddies etc.  And I have also found that sometimes when a writer appears to be trying to subvert the tropes, that can feel very contrived--as though it is really getting in the way of the story, as much as polemicizing/proselytizing does. (And any &#039;exterior&#039; agenda getting in the way of the story is the cardinal sin, imho!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there can be both outstanding and poor examples of any genre, and that just because each genre has its tropes doesn&#8217;t mean we should get away with treating them as a &#8216;formula.&#8217; I find I look mainly to the world building and the characters&#8211;the new and the freshness, as well as the depth to the storytelling, can really come in there, even if there is a &#8216;quest&#8217; (ie &#8216;problem to be solved/resolved&#8211;I mean, go figure!), or a band of buddies etc.  And I have also found that sometimes when a writer appears to be trying to subvert the tropes, that can feel very contrived&#8211;as though it is really getting in the way of the story, as much as polemicizing/proselytizing does. (And any &#8216;exterior&#8217; agenda getting in the way of the story is the cardinal sin, imho!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul (@princejvstin)</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2012/01/guest-post-helen-lowe-asks-do-we-need-to-make-epic-fantasy-new/#comment-98376</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul (@princejvstin)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsignal.com/?p=48606#comment-98376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Helen

I think there is plenty of life in the old Tropes, if they are told well.  That&#039;s the key, though.  Painting straight by the numbers gives any genre, especially one as prominent and large as epic fantasy, a bad name.  

Therein lies the rub. I read a highly publicized epic fantasy last year that felt to me not much more than paint-by-number, and I was not amused.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Helen</p>
<p>I think there is plenty of life in the old Tropes, if they are told well.  That&#8217;s the key, though.  Painting straight by the numbers gives any genre, especially one as prominent and large as epic fantasy, a bad name.  </p>
<p>Therein lies the rub. I read a highly publicized epic fantasy last year that felt to me not much more than paint-by-number, and I was not amused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen Lowe</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2012/01/guest-post-helen-lowe-asks-do-we-need-to-make-epic-fantasy-new/#comment-98375</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen Lowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsignal.com/?p=48606#comment-98375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, John.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John R. Fultz</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2012/01/guest-post-helen-lowe-asks-do-we-need-to-make-epic-fantasy-new/#comment-98373</link>
		<dc:creator>John R. Fultz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 07:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsignal.com/?p=48606#comment-98373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well said!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
