<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MIND MELD: What is the Next Big Thing in Speculative Fiction?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2013/02/mind-meld-what-is-the-next-big-thing-in-speculative-fiction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2013/02/mind-meld-what-is-the-next-big-thing-in-speculative-fiction/</link>
	<description>A science fiction blog featuring science fiction book reviews and with frequent ramblings on fantasy, computers and the web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 23:12:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Jernigan</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2013/02/mind-meld-what-is-the-next-big-thing-in-speculative-fiction/#comment-132714</link>
		<dc:creator>Zachary Jernigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 19:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsignal.com/?p=72015#comment-132714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, David. What a... response. 

Beside the obvious ridiculousness of beginning a reply with, &quot;Granted, I haven’t [read] much SF/F published after about 1995...&quot; and then going on to criticize the state of the genre at length, you display an appalling lack of compassion (or interest!) in groups you admit have been oppressed and were woefully underrepresented before, oh, say, 1995 or later. But that was well after you stopped reading in the genre.

Furthermore, what is ridiculous to you is just that: ridiculous to you. Get your elitist head out of your elitist ass.

And, just to belabor the point: judging the talent of authors in a genre you don&#039;t widely read is... well, it&#039;s appallingly presumptuous.

But yeah, good comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, David. What a&#8230; response. </p>
<p>Beside the obvious ridiculousness of beginning a reply with, &#8220;Granted, I haven’t [read] much SF/F published after about 1995&#8230;&#8221; and then going on to criticize the state of the genre at length, you display an appalling lack of compassion (or interest!) in groups you admit have been oppressed and were woefully underrepresented before, oh, say, 1995 or later. But that was well after you stopped reading in the genre.</p>
<p>Furthermore, what is ridiculous to you is just that: ridiculous to you. Get your elitist head out of your elitist ass.</p>
<p>And, just to belabor the point: judging the talent of authors in a genre you don&#8217;t widely read is&#8230; well, it&#8217;s appallingly presumptuous.</p>
<p>But yeah, good comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H.</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2013/02/mind-meld-what-is-the-next-big-thing-in-speculative-fiction/#comment-132709</link>
		<dc:creator>David H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 16:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsignal.com/?p=72015#comment-132709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, I truly think the &quot;Next Big Thing&quot; for SF is the dustbin of history. Granted, I haven&#039;t much SF/F published after about 1995, but who can blame me, what with the preeminence of absofrickinlutely ridiculous subgenres such as zombie and vampire lifestyle novels, singularity mysticism tracts, defeat (or be) the elite Galactic Fascism strike force (i.e., &quot;military&quot; scifi), Doorstopper Fantasy Epic, and last (and least) OhpleasevaluemypointofviewcauseI&#039;mamemberofahistoricallyoppressedgroup- andREALLYKNOWWHAT&#039;SWRONGWITHEVERYTHINGnowhateyourselfoppressor!. Sadly, the best of today&#039;s crop of SFF authors is at about the talent level of the &#039;70s midlisters, and they&#039;re either too worried about being politically acceptable (or calling others politically unacceptable) or are the pigdog literary descendants of the SF pigdogs of the days of yore.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, I truly think the &#8220;Next Big Thing&#8221; for SF is the dustbin of history. Granted, I haven&#8217;t much SF/F published after about 1995, but who can blame me, what with the preeminence of absofrickinlutely ridiculous subgenres such as zombie and vampire lifestyle novels, singularity mysticism tracts, defeat (or be) the elite Galactic Fascism strike force (i.e., &#8220;military&#8221; scifi), Doorstopper Fantasy Epic, and last (and least) OhpleasevaluemypointofviewcauseI&#8217;mamemberofahistoricallyoppressedgroup- andREALLYKNOWWHAT&#8217;SWRONGWITHEVERYTHINGnowhateyourselfoppressor!. Sadly, the best of today&#8217;s crop of SFF authors is at about the talent level of the &#8217;70s midlisters, and they&#8217;re either too worried about being politically acceptable (or calling others politically unacceptable) or are the pigdog literary descendants of the SF pigdogs of the days of yore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl V. Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2013/02/mind-meld-what-is-the-next-big-thing-in-speculative-fiction/#comment-132662</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl V. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsignal.com/?p=72015#comment-132662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Might not be good. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might not be good. <img src='http://www.sfsignal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Sharps</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2013/02/mind-meld-what-is-the-next-big-thing-in-speculative-fiction/#comment-132659</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Sharps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsignal.com/?p=72015#comment-132659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will Wheaton? I wonder how Sheldon Cooper would feel about that!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will Wheaton? I wonder how Sheldon Cooper would feel about that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl V. Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2013/02/mind-meld-what-is-the-next-big-thing-in-speculative-fiction/#comment-132628</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl V. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsignal.com/?p=72015#comment-132628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think I would have enjoyed &quot;reading&quot; Ready Player One, but the audio version was fantastic.  Wil Wheaton was a perfect choice for the narrator and his efforts made the parts that should have been edited better more tolerable, making the overall experience a pleasurable one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I would have enjoyed &#8220;reading&#8221; Ready Player One, but the audio version was fantastic.  Wil Wheaton was a perfect choice for the narrator and his efforts made the parts that should have been edited better more tolerable, making the overall experience a pleasurable one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Sharps</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2013/02/mind-meld-what-is-the-next-big-thing-in-speculative-fiction/#comment-132627</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Sharps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsignal.com/?p=72015#comment-132627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe it&#039;s the 14 year old at my heart that will never grow up, but I&#039;d love books to come with more illustrations. I never read all of Sanderson&#039;s &quot;Way of Kings&quot; but you better believe I went through and looked at all the pretty pictures.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s the 14 year old at my heart that will never grow up, but I&#8217;d love books to come with more illustrations. I never read all of Sanderson&#8217;s &#8220;Way of Kings&#8221; but you better believe I went through and looked at all the pretty pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Connelly</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2013/02/mind-meld-what-is-the-next-big-thing-in-speculative-fiction/#comment-132624</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Connelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsignal.com/?p=72015#comment-132624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have *some* interest in seeing that type of ebook, if the infrastructure was in place to support it without some horrendous vendor lock-in or DRM ruining it. I loved books with illustrations as a kid and never understood why transitioning to &quot;adult&quot; or &quot;serious&quot; books meant giving up all illustration. Pyle, Dulac, Rackham, et al--who wouldn&#039;t enjoy seeing more of that kind of art (or Martiniere, the Dillons, Palencar, Whelan, etc.) inside the covers of the book as well as on the cover. Well ebooks don&#039;t need covers, but there&#039;s also no extra printing costs for having color illustrations. And sound you could control would make it more immersive--I&#039;m probably one of the few people that bought the Myst soundtrack CD so I could hear it outside the game, so that has appeal.

Designing your own characters for video segments, that I could see wasting a lot of time on if there were templates that were easy enough to customize. Having the reading/viewing/listening experience segue into a social networking interaction is not something an old fossil like me would care much for, but think of the kids Will Ludwigsen talks about above. Those are the people who would really need to be hooked in to make this type of ebook fly.

The New Pulp would be written by underpaid and probably underage authors fueled by dreams, adrenaline or caffeine, and a lot of it would be bad, like a lot of the pulp paperback novels were from the late &#039;30s through the early &#039;60s. But good, even brilliant, stuff would emerge. And the whole enterprise would have lots of energy and a consistent appeal to all of our baser instincts, just like comic books and pulp paperbacks when they first came into existence.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have *some* interest in seeing that type of ebook, if the infrastructure was in place to support it without some horrendous vendor lock-in or DRM ruining it. I loved books with illustrations as a kid and never understood why transitioning to &#8220;adult&#8221; or &#8220;serious&#8221; books meant giving up all illustration. Pyle, Dulac, Rackham, et al&#8211;who wouldn&#8217;t enjoy seeing more of that kind of art (or Martiniere, the Dillons, Palencar, Whelan, etc.) inside the covers of the book as well as on the cover. Well ebooks don&#8217;t need covers, but there&#8217;s also no extra printing costs for having color illustrations. And sound you could control would make it more immersive&#8211;I&#8217;m probably one of the few people that bought the Myst soundtrack CD so I could hear it outside the game, so that has appeal.</p>
<p>Designing your own characters for video segments, that I could see wasting a lot of time on if there were templates that were easy enough to customize. Having the reading/viewing/listening experience segue into a social networking interaction is not something an old fossil like me would care much for, but think of the kids Will Ludwigsen talks about above. Those are the people who would really need to be hooked in to make this type of ebook fly.</p>
<p>The New Pulp would be written by underpaid and probably underage authors fueled by dreams, adrenaline or caffeine, and a lot of it would be bad, like a lot of the pulp paperback novels were from the late &#8217;30s through the early &#8217;60s. But good, even brilliant, stuff would emerge. And the whole enterprise would have lots of energy and a consistent appeal to all of our baser instincts, just like comic books and pulp paperbacks when they first came into existence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Sharps</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2013/02/mind-meld-what-is-the-next-big-thing-in-speculative-fiction/#comment-132617</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Sharps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsignal.com/?p=72015#comment-132617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I wasn&#039;t so dang lazy I&#039;d probably try one out myself. A Kindle version would take care of some of the hard work, like rolling dice...and writing down stats...brilliant :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I wasn&#8217;t so dang lazy I&#8217;d probably try one out myself. A Kindle version would take care of some of the hard work, like rolling dice&#8230;and writing down stats&#8230;brilliant <img src='http://www.sfsignal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul (@princejvstin)</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2013/02/mind-meld-what-is-the-next-big-thing-in-speculative-fiction/#comment-132616</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul (@princejvstin)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsignal.com/?p=72015#comment-132616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember those, fondly. There is even a kindle app version of a couple of them now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember those, fondly. There is even a kindle app version of a couple of them now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Sharps</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2013/02/mind-meld-what-is-the-next-big-thing-in-speculative-fiction/#comment-132614</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Sharps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsignal.com/?p=72015#comment-132614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I bought &quot;The Last Policeman&quot; for my father for Christmas. I don&#039;t think he has read it yet but I&#039;m looking to snatch it from him the moment he finishes. 

I did read &quot;Angelmaker&quot;, there&#039;s a review for it somewhere on SF Signal if you&#039;d be interested in reading it. I liked it a lot. 

I own &quot;The Passage&quot; but my wavering attention span can&#039;t help but be intimidated by the size of it. I&#039;ve become a sissy when it comes to book length. 

I have two copies of &quot;Ready Player One&quot; but I couldn&#039;t really get into it. Rack it up to nostalgia of a different generation I suppose. 

I wonder if perhaps this trend is nearly unacknowledged because of the way the &quot;literary&quot; community has largely looked down upon broad appeal mainstream fiction? Maybe. That would be cause for another great Mind Meld topic. Thanks for the feedback!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought &#8220;The Last Policeman&#8221; for my father for Christmas. I don&#8217;t think he has read it yet but I&#8217;m looking to snatch it from him the moment he finishes. </p>
<p>I did read &#8220;Angelmaker&#8221;, there&#8217;s a review for it somewhere on SF Signal if you&#8217;d be interested in reading it. I liked it a lot. </p>
<p>I own &#8220;The Passage&#8221; but my wavering attention span can&#8217;t help but be intimidated by the size of it. I&#8217;ve become a sissy when it comes to book length. </p>
<p>I have two copies of &#8220;Ready Player One&#8221; but I couldn&#8217;t really get into it. Rack it up to nostalgia of a different generation I suppose. </p>
<p>I wonder if perhaps this trend is nearly unacknowledged because of the way the &#8220;literary&#8221; community has largely looked down upon broad appeal mainstream fiction? Maybe. That would be cause for another great Mind Meld topic. Thanks for the feedback!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Greybeard</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2013/02/mind-meld-what-is-the-next-big-thing-in-speculative-fiction/#comment-132605</link>
		<dc:creator>David Greybeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsignal.com/?p=72015#comment-132605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Next big thing? 
It&#039;s already here and nearly unacknowledged in SF, F &amp; Horror circles. 
Mainstream and &quot;literary&quot; authors writing SFF &amp; H to broad appeal. 

Examples: 
DOG STARS by Peter Heller
The Road by C. McCarthy
Breed by Chase Novak
Age of Miracles by Karen Walker
The Last Policeman by Ben Winters
Angelmaker by Nick Harkaway
Ready Player One by Ernest Cline
Something Red by Douglas Nicholas
Some Kind of Fairy Tale by Graham Joyce
Night Circus by Erin Morgenstern
The Time Traveler&#039;s Wife by Audrey Niffenberger
The Passage by Justin Cronin
Zone One by Colson Whitehead]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next big thing?<br />
It&#8217;s already here and nearly unacknowledged in SF, F &amp; Horror circles.<br />
Mainstream and &#8220;literary&#8221; authors writing SFF &amp; H to broad appeal. </p>
<p>Examples:<br />
DOG STARS by Peter Heller<br />
The Road by C. McCarthy<br />
Breed by Chase Novak<br />
Age of Miracles by Karen Walker<br />
The Last Policeman by Ben Winters<br />
Angelmaker by Nick Harkaway<br />
Ready Player One by Ernest Cline<br />
Something Red by Douglas Nicholas<br />
Some Kind of Fairy Tale by Graham Joyce<br />
Night Circus by Erin Morgenstern<br />
The Time Traveler&#8217;s Wife by Audrey Niffenberger<br />
The Passage by Justin Cronin<br />
Zone One by Colson Whitehead</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Sharps</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2013/02/mind-meld-what-is-the-next-big-thing-in-speculative-fiction/#comment-132604</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Sharps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsignal.com/?p=72015#comment-132604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like that, it has merit. It&#039;s also sort of depressing but I suppose that&#039;s what makes it so plausible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that, it has merit. It&#8217;s also sort of depressing but I suppose that&#8217;s what makes it so plausible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.A. Wardrope</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2013/02/mind-meld-what-is-the-next-big-thing-in-speculative-fiction/#comment-132599</link>
		<dc:creator>T.A. Wardrope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 05:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsignal.com/?p=72015#comment-132599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SF as most people know it will become increasingly retro, so that it will become a kind niche, say &quot;Astro-Punk&quot;. This will happen as the rapid acceleration of technology outpaces the imagination of popular authors. Speculative will become the driver pushing ahead the future of the genre. As we increasingly doubt a future is even possible, we will seek to re-imagine and understand the present or past.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SF as most people know it will become increasingly retro, so that it will become a kind niche, say &#8220;Astro-Punk&#8221;. This will happen as the rapid acceleration of technology outpaces the imagination of popular authors. Speculative will become the driver pushing ahead the future of the genre. As we increasingly doubt a future is even possible, we will seek to re-imagine and understand the present or past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Sharps</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2013/02/mind-meld-what-is-the-next-big-thing-in-speculative-fiction/#comment-132597</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Sharps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 04:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsignal.com/?p=72015#comment-132597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well at least you&#039;re switching things up :P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well at least you&#8217;re switching things up <img src='http://www.sfsignal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betsy Dornbusch</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2013/02/mind-meld-what-is-the-next-big-thing-in-speculative-fiction/#comment-132596</link>
		<dc:creator>Betsy Dornbusch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 04:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsignal.com/?p=72015#comment-132596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ditto on the sexual assault. I find it annoying and overused. (Though I&#039;m about to give my agent a book with a sexual assault...against a man. Does that count?)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto on the sexual assault. I find it annoying and overused. (Though I&#8217;m about to give my agent a book with a sexual assault&#8230;against a man. Does that count?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
