<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q&amp;A with the Authors of the New Anthology &#8220;Oz Reimagined: New Tales from the Emerald City and Beyond&#8221; (Part 2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2013/03/qa-with-the-authors-of-the-new-anthology-oz-reimagined-new-tales-from-the-emerald-city-and-beyond-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2013/03/qa-with-the-authors-of-the-new-anthology-oz-reimagined-new-tales-from-the-emerald-city-and-beyond-part-2/</link>
	<description>A science fiction blog featuring science fiction book reviews and with frequent ramblings on fantasy, computers and the web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:37:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Splicer</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2013/03/qa-with-the-authors-of-the-new-anthology-oz-reimagined-new-tales-from-the-emerald-city-and-beyond-part-2/#comment-132927</link>
		<dc:creator>Splicer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 21:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsignal.com/?p=72294#comment-132927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think doing a prequel was the smart way to go since doing a retelling, especially of something as iconic as the classic film, doesn&#039;t often go well. Tim Burton crapped himself viciously with Charlie and the Chocolate Factory since the musical starring the brilliant Gene Wilder is perfect. Same with what they did with The Producers except in that case going from a film to a musical (then a film of the musical). No matter what you do, you can&#039;t do better than Gene Wilder (him again) and the great Zero Mostel. Prequel worked for Wicked and I think it&#039;ll work for Oz the Great and Powerful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think doing a prequel was the smart way to go since doing a retelling, especially of something as iconic as the classic film, doesn&#8217;t often go well. Tim Burton crapped himself viciously with Charlie and the Chocolate Factory since the musical starring the brilliant Gene Wilder is perfect. Same with what they did with The Producers except in that case going from a film to a musical (then a film of the musical). No matter what you do, you can&#8217;t do better than Gene Wilder (him again) and the great Zero Mostel. Prequel worked for Wicked and I think it&#8217;ll work for Oz the Great and Powerful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul (@princejvstin)</title>
		<link>http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2013/03/qa-with-the-authors-of-the-new-anthology-oz-reimagined-new-tales-from-the-emerald-city-and-beyond-part-2/#comment-132924</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul (@princejvstin)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 16:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfsignal.com/?p=72294#comment-132924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not hopeful for the new Oz film, but it would be nice if it was decent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not hopeful for the new Oz film, but it would be nice if it was decent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
