News Ticker

Sequel to 28 Days Later

A sequel to the zombie movie 28 Days Later, tentatively titled 28 Weeks Later, is in the works, Sci Fi Wire reports.

About John DeNardo (13013 Articles)
John DeNardo is the Managing Editor at SF Signal and a columnist at Kirkus Reviews. He also likes bagels. So there.

15 Comments on Sequel to 28 Days Later

  1. 28 Weeks later

    According to SciFi.com a sequel to 28 Days Later is planned, but without Danny Boyle directing and without an Alex Garland script. Could be a recipe for a terrible film. [Via SFSignal]…

  2. Elijah Miles // September 9, 2004 at 8:03 pm //

    PLEASE, PLEASE MAKE A SEQUEL THIS MOVIE IS PERFECT AS IT IS BUT IF YOU CAN MAKE IT SPREAD TO THE US OR SOMETHING TRY IT

    PROVE EVERYBODY WRONG AND MAKE IT ONE OF THE BEST HORROR SEQUELS DONE. PLEASE, PLEASE DON”T MAKE IT KORNY CAUSE MOST SEQUELS ARE. PROVE PEOPLE WRONG, AND PLEASE KEEP THE SAME CAST!!!!!!!!!

    OR KILL SOMEONE AND ADD A DIFFERENT PERSON BUT KEEP THE BLACK GIRL AND LEADING MAN.

    PLEASE PROVE TO PEOPLE THAT THE STORY ISN”T ENDING ITS JUST BEGINNING!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

  3. I loved the first Movie and have preyed and preyed for a sequel as it says above – Pleas Keep the same cast!!!

  4. A 28 Days later sequel would be great, its such a good, well written story that it deserves a good (not corny) sequel.

    Please make one. Cheers!

  5. Chris Treborn // June 26, 2005 at 2:16 pm //

    to refer to this movie as being a “zombie” film is an unfounded remark, zombie alludes to the reanimation of the dead, in 28 days later thses ppl are not infact dead but subject to a virus, so the phrase “insinuative zombie” would be less misguiding.

  6. make it happen

  7. This was a very well written movie, on of the best zombie films I have ever seen. I am a huge fan of zombie films ever since I was about 3. Now a sequel to this movie would make big money, and satisfy viewers, I know I would definantly be satisfied, and as it says above, this movie needs the same characters, I thought the first one was great. What says the second be better.

  8. It will not be any good unless they include some time-travelling space Nazi zombies in it as well.

  9. Dont fuck up a sequal to 28 days later. I beg of you. Make it more gorey and more gruesome then the first. Change the title name too 28 weeks later isnt to great in my opinion. I heard the original cast wont stay. If they dont, you better pull some good actors out of your ass and make this sequal the best it can be. Dont ruin this for me

  10. Thanks for your inciteful commentary. Of course, you just can’t argue with a pack of time-travelling space Nazin zombies.

    (H)

  11. De Buav // June 29, 2006 at 5:13 pm //

    1. They arn’t zombies, they’re infected with rage.

    2. didnt the infected die out?

    3. why would the original cast go to america?

    In my opinion the sequel might ruin it, but you only live once so you might as well take a chance, you might prove me wrong.

  12. “They arn’t zombies, they’re infected with rage.”

    Ah, you have to understand that the zombie reference is a long-running in joke here at SF Signal.

    And, by the way “are not” or “aren’t”, no?

    πŸ™‚

  13. Joke? I think not – they are a bastion upon which all else is built. If it were not for time travelling undead entities (zombies are one such beast), I could not imagine SFSignal as it exists today…

    Thank you ladies and gentlemen, and all the members of the press…

    πŸ˜€

  14. And when do we drag the NY Yankees into the sequel?

    (H)

  15. OMG THIS FILM IS AMAZING PLEASE MAKE ANOTHER 1 WITH THE SAME CAST!!!!!!

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: