News Ticker

MIND MELD: SF/F Stories For English Lit Class

[Do you have an idea for a future Mind Meld? Let us know!]

Last week I attended my son’s high school’s open house. In the English Literature class we were informed that the kids had started reading the Arthur Miller play The Crucible which the kids would enjoy because, in the teacher’s words, “It’s got witches and adultery.” Many SF/F stories have those elements (if not in the same form) but, of course, there is nary a SF/F book on the agenda for the year. And in any case, stories can be interesting to teenagers without either or both.

Q: If you were creating the syllabus for a high school (junior or senior) English Literature course, what SF/F stories do you think should be included?

Here’s what they said…

Kristine Smith
Kristine Smith was born in Buffalo, NY. She grew up in Florida, and graduated from the University of South Florida with a BS in Chemistry. She has spent almost her entire working career in manufacturing/R&D of one kind or another, and has worked for the same northern Illinois pharmaceutical company for 25 years. She is the winner of the 2001 John W. Campbell Award for Best New Writer, and is the author of the Jani Kilian SF series as well as a number of short stories. She is currently working on several projects, and wishes she possessed a time-turner.

My list is by no means extensive or complete, but I thought of stories that contained elements of North American–Mexican, Appalachian–folklore, or that discussed current events and issues–struggles with religion in everyday life, culture clashes and war, discrimination–in ways that weren’t preachy.

Elizabeth Moon: “Knight of Other Days” — one of my favorite stories by Moon. When I first read it, I got the sense of a subtle Twilight Zone/Outer Limits-type tale, grounded in the setting of a Texas border town. The blend of history, mystery, influence of Mexican culture, and legend of the Knights Templar combine to form a multi-layered tale.

Terry Pratchett: Small Gods, Jingo, Feet of Clay — religion, culture clash/war, discrimination, set in a world different enough from ours to qualify as fantasy yet similar enough to equate to everyday life, news headlines. One of Pratchett’s many writing gifts.

Manly Wade Wellman: John the Balladeer tales, esp “Vandy, Vandy” — the Southern/Appalachian folklore, and the sense of how events in history can take on a fantasy spin when some details are scrambled and others are associated with magical intervention. And in “Vandy, Vandy,” there’s a witch! Well, a warlock. And a King, of sorts.

Matthew Sturges
Matthew Sturges is the writer of a number of comics, including House of Mystery, Blue Beetle, Doctor Who: A Fairytale Life, and JSA: All-Stars. With Bill Willingham he’s written JSA and the Eisner-nominated Jack of Fables. His upcoming projects include The Four Norsemen of the Apocalypse with artist John Lucas. He’s also the author of a pair of novels: Midwinter and its sequel, The Office of Shadow. He once composed the music and lyrics for a musical comedy called Lysistrata 3000, which was exactly as bad as it sounds.

There are, of course, any number of science fiction/fantasy books that are already taught to students, who are so inured to their inclusion in canon that everyone’s forgotten that they are indeed science fiction and/or fantasy. From Beowulf to Brave New World, we’ve been teaching these books, quietly assuring the children that it’s okay to read these, because they’re literature. Shakespeare has A Midsummer Night’s Dream, The Tempest, Macbeth… hell, even Hamlet has a ghost in it, and it’s one of the most highly-regarded works of literature in the English language.

But that’s obviously not what you mean, so I’ll suggest a few titles I think worthy of inclusion. Why not pair a reading of The Canterbury Tales and the selected works of John Keats with Dan Simmons’ Chaucer- and Keats-inspired Hyperion? How about delving into complex issues of gender and economics with Le Guin’s The Left Hand of Darkness and The Dispossessed? Wouldn’t high school students much rather be reading Slaughterhouse Five or Cat’s Cradle or just about anything else by Kurt Vonnegut, than just about anything they’re currently reading? Let them eat up Ender’s Game! Let them feast on Foundation! Let them devour Dune! Can you imagine how much more you’d have enjoyed high school if they’d let you read Beggars in Spain instead of Ivanhoe?

Patrick Rothfuss
Patrick Rothfuss is the author of The Name of the Wind and The Wise Man’s Fear. He lives in Wisconsin where he teaches, writes and plays the occasional video game.


Adam Roberts
Adam Roberts was born two-thirds of the way through the last century; he presently lives a little way west of London, England, with a beautiful wife and two children. He is a writer with a day-job (professor at Royal Holloway, University of London).

Frankenstein, Jekyll and Hyde, War of the Worlds and Time Machine all have the pedagogic benefits of being (a) short, (b) readable, (c) out of copyright and available free online in the US [although in the UK, the Wells titles remain in copyright until 2017] and (d) brilliant. They also cover three of the most significant iterations of key SF themes: monsters and scientists; alien invasion, war and destruction; time travel. They have all also been widely translated into film and other media, to which young students are less likely to be hostile than can be the case with books. I choose to see this as a good thing, pedagogically: not least because the differences between the original texts and their myriad adaptations can become an interesting class discussion point in its own right.

James Patrick Kelly
James Patrick Kelly has won the Hugo, Nebula and Locus awards; his fiction has been translated into eighteen languages. With John Kessel he is co-editor of Digital Rapture: The Singularity Anthology, Kafkaesque: Stories Inspired by Franz Kafka, The Secret History Of Science Fiction, Feeling Very Strange: The Slipstream Anthology and Rewired: The Post Cyberpunk Anthology. He writes a column on the internet for Asimov’s Science Fiction Magazine and is on the faculty of the Stonecoast Creative Writing MFA Program at the University of Southern Maine. His most recent publishing venture is the ezine James Patrick Kelly’s Strangeways. You can listen to Jim read his stories on the Free Reads Podcast.

I would be very sad indeed if any of the sf stories in my hypothetical high school English class syllabus bounced off students in the way that some of the stories I was assigned in high school bounced off me. I have been thinking a lot recently about which stories, once considered classics of the genre, might over time have devolved into interesting-but-flawed oldschool sf. Alas, many of my faves as a kid have passed their sell-by date. Nuclear war in 1970? Didn’t happen. Colonies on Mars alongside ancient canals? Please. Helpless women in need of rescue? Computers the size of warehouses? DIY spaceships? And where’s the internet?

When my daughter was a teen, I tried to turn her on to Heinlein, who was one of my favorites growing up. (There’s still a lot of RAH I really like – just not the late stuff). He bounced off her. Maybe it was his politics, sexual and otherwise, or maybe it was that some of his stuff was in desperate need of footnotes. Dad, what are slide rules? But getting her to read him and some of the other Golden Agers was like getting her to watch black and white movies. Do you realize how hard it is to convince people of a certain age to look at black and white movies of any kind, but sf movies in particular? Kids these days! Don’t get me started!

This is all by way of explaining why my list may tend to be more contemporary than some of the others here. It isn’t that I don’t still love the old masters, but I’d want my imaginary seventeen year olds to be excited by the stuff they read so that they go straight from English class to the library or for more terrific stories that map onto their world. So here are ten titles in no particular order which I believe combine a sense of wonder with teachability and high literary achievement. In time, of course, some of these also will pass their sell-by date, but then that is the fate of all sf, no?

  • James Tiptree Jr. “And I Awoke and Found Me Here on the Cold Hill’s Side”
  • Bruce Sterling “We See Things Differently
  • Ursula LeGuin “The Ones Who Walked Away From Omelas”
  • Robert Silverberg “The Pope of the Chimps”
  • Connie Willis “Even The Queen”
  • Ted Chiang “Story of Your Life”
  • Maureen McHugh “The Cost To Be Wise”
  • Daryl Gregory “Second Person, Present Tense”
  • David Marusek “A Wedding Album”
  • Nancy Kress Beggars In Spain
Bradley Beaulieu
Bradley P. Beaulieu is the author of the Russian-inspired epic fantasy series that begins with The Winds of Khalakovo, continues in The Straits of Galahesh, and concludes with The Flames of Shadam Khoreh. In addition to being an L. Ron Hubbard Writers of the Future Award winner, Brad’s stories have appeared in various other publications, including Realms of Fantasy Magazine, Orson Scott Card’s Intergalactic Medicine Show, Writers of the Future 20, and several anthologies from DAW Books. His story, “In the Eyes of the Empress’s Cat,” was voted a Notable Story of 2006 in the Million Writers Award.>

I think I’d pick three different types of reads to show the depth and breadth of science fiction and fantasy. First, I’d pick a lighter read that has some weight to it, something pretty relatable to give them an easy introduction to the field. The Hunger Games, by Suzanne Collins fits this bill nicely. Although The Hunger Games deals with some serious, adult themes, it has young protagonists and is an easy read. More importantly, it’s compelling. The ease with which teenagers would absorb the novel could be used to launch into more serious topics like what it means to rebel and how close societies can be to cruelty, strife, or even outright collapse. It also provides a strong example of how adding tension can carry a reader through a story.

Next, I would introduce them to something that merges bold science fictional elements with strong, three dimensional characters. I’d pick something from Robert Charles Wilson, my favorite science fiction author. Something like The Chronoliths, a story about pillars that begin arriving on Earth from our own near future. The specfic elements of The Chronoliths are well reasoned, but Wilson also has a gift for populating his stories with real characters with emotions that move beyond the page. I think Wilson’s writing also provides good examples that it’s still possible to push boundaries in science fiction. Chronoliths revisits the well worn topic of time travel, but does so in a fresh and compelling way.

Lastly, I think I’d choose something a bit more dense to show the literary side of the field. And who better for this than Guy Gavriel Kay? The Lions of al-Rassan is one of my favorites of his, and it shows—as do all Kay’s works—how beautiful the written word can be, even in a place that some might not expect it: in epic fantasy. The Lions of al-Rassan is a story of two men who are at first on opposite sides of a brewing conflict, but as the story plays out they begin to question the wisdom of their paths. It’s a story steeped in religion, in custom, and in emotion, and Kay’s ability to marry poetry with prose are on full display.

Karen Lord
Karen Lord is a writer and research consultant in Barbados. Her debut novel Redemption in Indigo won the 2008 Frank Collymore Literary Award, the 2011 William L. Crawford Award, the 2011 Mythopoeic Fantasy Award for Adult Literature, and the 2010 Carl Brandon Parallax Award, and was nominated for the 2011 World Fantasy Award for Best Novel. She was nominated for the 2012 Campbell Award for Best New Writer, and her second novel The Best of All Possible Worlds (winner of the 2009 Frank Collymore Literary Award) will be published 5 February 2013.

I’m baffled at the idea that witches and adultery are a special draw for the teen reader, especially since The Crucible has none of the former and only mentions of the latter. Perhaps the teacher was searching for relevance and found McCarthyism too out-of-date (hah, it never is), but wouldn’t it have been more sensible to point out the themes of peer pressure and bullying? But, enjoyable or not, a work like The Crucible isn’t simply meant for casual reading. It’s a play and it’s meant to be watched. If you’re studying it for English Literature, you should be at a level where you’re learning to analyse and not merely enjoy.

Books assigned for English Literature may fall into two categories. There are books appropriate for a reading list: they can be read for a better understanding of a particular culture, historical era or genre as well as for pure entertainment. Then there are books that form the core of an English Literature syllabus: they must be sufficiently complex to permit a certain level of analysis so that the techniques of criticism and storycraft can be taught and tested.

The definition of SF/F is another matter. Children’s books often have fantasy elements, but do we consider The Wind in the Willows by Kenneth Grahame, or Watership Down by Richard Adams to be fantasy because they have talking animals, one set very anthropomorphised and the other not? Literature of a certain era may have supernatural elements. Do we include The Turn of the Screw by Henry James or The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde … or even Beowulf? What about the socio-political commentary in Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift and Animal Farm by George Orwell, and the dystopias Nineteen Eighty-Four, also by George Orwell, and A Brave New World by Aldous Huxley?

A side question – should there be a focus on young adult SF? Would that include works like The Chrysalids and The Midwich Cuckoos by John Wyndham which have child protagonists and antagonists but deal with adult themes?

To simplify the question and the answer, let me state what I would want a work of SF to accomplish if it were to be chosen for an English Literature class, either reading list or core syllabus. I would want it to demonstrate the origins of the genre, revealing the longstanding tropes and traditions which still shape contemporary works. I would need it to have an additional layer of psychological or socio-political significance so that the traditional forms – for example, myth, quest, utopia/dystopia, alien encounter and colonisation, technology and the definition of human, etc. – are used to tell a larger story. Above all, it must be a well-written, well-structured work that does not fail when subjected to the same literary scrutiny given to non SF texts.

Here is my list. The first section focuses on the origins of the genre. The titles of the first and second sections and all previously mentioned works are or were assigned or recommended texts for English Literature by the Caribbean Examinations Council (CXC).

The third section contains my own personal choices and I do not consider it to be definitive as I have a lot more reading to do.

1) Frankenstein, Mary Shelley; Dracula, Bram Stoker; Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, Robert Louis Stevenson; The Hobbit, J.R.R. Tolkien; The short fiction of Ray Bradbury, especially ‘Dark They Were, and Golden Eyed’, and some of his other ‘rockets and robots’ stories.

2) My Bones and My Flute, Edgar Mittelholzer; Flowers for Algernon, Daniel Keyes; A Wrinkle in Time, Madeleine L’Engle

3) ‘Exhalation’, Ted Chiang; Till We Have Faces, C.S. Lewis; Skin Folk, Nalo Hopkinson; The Weird, eds Ann and Jeff VanderMeer

Disclaimer. I have never taught English Literature.

John C. Wright
John C. Wright is the author of The Golden Age Trilogy, The War of the Dreaming, Chronicles of Chaos, Null-A Continuum, the authorized sequel of A.E. van Vogt’s World of Null-A books and Count to a Trillion. His short fiction has appeared in Year’s Best SF 3, The Night Lands, Best Short Novels 2004, The Year’s Best Science Fiction #21, Breach The Hull, and No Longer Dreams.

The question is frankly a very difficult one. Let us analyze it.

The purpose of education is to teach the youth the basics of reading, writing, arithmetic, and, as they grow, to teach either a trade or to train them in the liberal arts (Grammar, Rhetoric, Logic, Arithmetic, Geometry, Music, Astronomy). Additionally, education must instruct the youth in the Christian faith and classical virtues (fortitude, temperance, justice, prudence), as well as teaching enough Civics and history to allow them to be productive and honest citizens of this Republic, able to serve as jurors, voters, or soldiers, wisely and bravely, as the need demands.

Unfortunately, the Progressives of over a century ago usurped the educational industry, and created an establishment similar to the Established Church of England, in that the schools became the primary conduit not of education, but of indoctrination in progressive dogmas, and, later, various lunatic dogmas of the Politically Correct, communism, feminism, sexual liberation, environmentalism, and most of all the doctrine that all philosophy is meaningless and all ethics relative, and human life not sacred.

Given this, when I am asked what science fiction and fantasy I would recommend to educate and instruct the youth, I take the question as being akin to asking what superhero comic books or fairy princess Disney cartoons I would recommend to educate and instruct the youth. But the purpose of science fiction and fantasy is to entertain, not to instruct. When art becomes didactic and pedagogical, it often loses its savor.

The question, for that purpose, is remarkably frivolous. At a time when children are not reading Euclid’s Elements is not the time to ask if they should be reading E.E. Smith’s Galactic Patrol. Let them first read Plutarch’s Lives, or Jacobus de Voragine’s Lives of the Saints, before they read Doug Adams’ Life, The Universe and Everything.

Ah! But there are three other purposes to education I have not mentioned. In regard to these other purposes of education, the question is not frivolous at all.

The first unmentioned purpose is the training of the passions so as to form and shape the character of the young so that their emotions will tend to fit the stock responses to stock situations.

Young men must learn to love what is loveable and hate what is hateful, to seek honor and flee shame, and above all to be honest; young women must learn femininity, decorum, chastity, and above all to be honest. Both must learn to love their country and their homes, to respect and obey their parents, and to revere God. They should adore the sublime beauties of nature and abhor modern art. In a Republic they must also learn respect for their fellow citizens, to fear the law, and Christian charity to the poor and weak.

If dear reader, you read this last paragraph and conclude that I am joking, or mad, or stupid, or deformed with unforgiveable evil, I draw your attention to the fact that you yourself have been trained in a certain stock response, but one which is less useful to civilization and civility that the list of stock responses I give. You have been conditioned, with your own willing participation perhaps, to regard emotion as superior to reason, and selfish emotion or self esteem as superior to everything, to regard honor as bluster, honesty as narrow-mindedness, sexual roles as oppression, religion as superstition hiding a dark impulse toward tyranny, obedience as craven and old-fashioned; and as for chastity, you probably have not heard that word spoken in a year, or in a decade, or ever and then only to hear it mocked.

If the concept of decency, the concept of the sexes treating each other virtuous and honestly, is literately unthinkable to you, if you cannot imagine it without giggling, without sneering, or cannot imagine it at all, then the conditioners have conditioned you well.

Dear reader, the idea of using the institution of educational instruction (which is the mechanisms used to pass the legacy of civilization to the next generation) openly and deliberately to pass along the Christian and classical virtues, our history, our way of life, as well as the theory and practice of civics and citizenship, no doubt strikes you as unconstitutional, if not appalling.

This is because you are indoctrinated in the idea that an educational establishment is like an established Church, and can only teach those things the state approves; and that the state, for reasons of public amity and Constitutionally limited government, cannot meddle in affairs of religion or indoctrination of the virtues. I draw your attention to the paradox involved: the theory of limited government places religion and virtue beyond the public sphere. But if education is placed within the public sphere, and made compulsory, tax-supported, then the youth cannot be educated in the fundamental things (things like virtue, wisdom, faith, good character) which education properly so called is meant to plant in the next generation. This means that by definition education cannot educate.

It can only regiment and indoctrinate.

It can only condition the subjects (not students) like Pavlov’s dogs to salivate when their master, Caesar, proffers them a treat, and to growl and bark at everything else, including (ironically) a real education.

This brings us to the second unmentioned purpose to education. It is the duty of every man of good will to rebel against the educational establishment as it currently stands and to subvert the current form of society and government, so as to abolish eventually, by slow increments or sudden revolution, the current Progressive program of compulsory indoctrination, and the cult of the culture of death.

The watchdogs of the establishment, O my revolutionary brothers and sisters, are slow-eyed and stupid, and we may be able to smuggle in the form of literature and entertainment works of art which subvert the paradigm, and rescue the next generation from the present age of darkness.

The third and final unmentioned purpose of education is merely to instruct the young in the culture and the history of their forefathers. Here science fiction and fantasy clearly has a role, for it is useful and necessary to teach the young to read and appreciate older books, including science fiction books, which have influenced the culture, or which have merit in their own right and may otherwise be forgotten.

At this point, it were easy enough to make a list of works of science fiction and fantasy which fill these three pedagogic, subversive, or preservative purposes:

Let us take the preservative purpose first. There are works of SFF which every literate person in the West should read at least once. Fantasy and Science Fiction cannot be understood except against the background of the ancient literature from which they sprang, and of which they alone are heir (for mainstream literature has betrayed the ancient traditions). Therefore, I recommend the high school students be required to read

  • The Illiad by Homer
  • The Oddesy
  • Antigone by Sophocles
  • The Orestiea of Aeschylus (Agamemnon, Libation Bearers, Eumenides)
  • The Aeneid of Virgil
  • Scipio’s Dream by Cicero
  • The Divine Comedy of Dante (Inferno, Purgatorio, Paradisio)
  • Orlando Furioso by Ariosto
  • Faerie Queen by Spencer
  • Paradise Lost by Milton
  • Macbeth, Hamlet, Julius Caeser, A Midsummer’s Night Dream, The Tempest by Shakespeare
  • Le Morte de Arthur by Mallory
  • Idylls of the King by Tennyson
  • A Christmas Carol by Dickens
  • A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court by Mark Twain
  • Jungle Book and ‘With the Night Mail’ by Kipling
  • 20000 Leagues Under the Sea, From Earth to the Moon, Around the World in 80 Days, Master of the World by Jules Verne
  • War of the Worlds, The Time Machine, The Island of Doctor Moreau by HG Wells
  • Last and First Men by Olaf Stapledon
  • Nineteen Eighty Four by George Orwell
  • Brave New World by Aldous Huxley
  • Fahrenheit 451, Something Wicked This Way Comes by Bradbury
  • The Worm Ouroboros by E.R. Eddison
  • A Voyage to Arcturus by David Lindsay
  • Childhood’s End by Arthur C. Clarke

For the purposes of subverting the dominant establishment, unfortunately I have far fewer books to recommend, since science fiction writers tend to be almost comically sheepish in their conformity to fashionable correctness, men like Harlan Ellison, Michael Moorcock, John Brunner, and J. G. Ballard.

But here and there, astonishing rebels rear their ungainly heads crowned with horns that they shake in defiance at the reaches of middle heaven:

  • Phantasies by MacDonald
  • Out of the Silent Planet, Perelandra, That Hideous Strength, Screwtape Letters, by C.S. Lewis. I would also include his Voyage of the Dawn Treader, except that frightened parents may not be willing to let their softbrained children read such dangerous literature.
  • Smith of Wotton Major and the Lord of the Rings trilogy by J.R.R. Tolkien.
  • A Princess of Mars by Edgar Rice Burroughs.
  • Past Master by R.A. Lafferty.
  • A Canticle for Leibowitz by Walter M Miller, Jr.
  • ‘Scanners Live in Vain’, ‘ The Dead Lady of Clown Town’, ‘ Alpha Ralpha Boulevard’ by Cordwainer Smith
  • Starship Troopers by Robert Heinlein
  • ‘Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius’, ‘ The Garden of Forking Paths’, ‘The Library of Babel’, ‘The Lottery in Babylon’ by Jorge Luis Borges.
  • ‘Fifth Head of Cerberus’ by Gene Wolfe as well as his Short Sun trilogy

I will pause to mention one oddity, because it both belongs on this list and not. A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess in the American version is conformist to the dominant paradigm. But the original British version, which ends in the beginning of reformation in the young sociopathic hooligan, is subversive; as all tales of redemption and reformation are.

Books which indicate the proper stock responses to things both fair and foul are more likely to be found in boy’s adventure fiction, girl’s romance paperbacks, or ballads and epic than in anything written after 1950. For the purposes of answering the question, the list above will serve for this as well.

Let me explain the including of what seems an oddity, namely, the pulp adventure fiction A PRINCESS OF MARS. I include this only because a young man of my acquaintance resolved ever to treat young ladies chivalrously, politely, and in a manly fashion only because of this book, and he rejected the cult of mutual sexual exploitation which the modern society seems to think normal or healthy. His stock response toward honor had been correctly trained.

I would have included Have Space Suit, Will Travel by Robert Heinlein, or Farmer in the Sky as an example of decent boy’s adventure fiction, except that the stock responses recorded in the book and passed onto the reader are the opposite of what is right, proper, normal and real. In the climax of Have Space Suit, for example, the hero Kip observes the trial of the vicious man-eating aliens called Wormfaces guilty of attack again Earth, and when the superhuman judges of an even more advanced race ask if any will speak on their behalf, Kip ponders whether he should plead for mercy for those who attacked his world, dismisses the idea with contempt, and hopes for their total obliteration. This is the exact wrong response to teach the young. Pitilessness is not a value for civilized men to teach their young. (Ironically, Kip and all the Earth are placed on trial in the next chapter, and the expected outcome, that the superhuman judges would condemn Earth for being as aggressive, pitiless and warlike as the Wormfaces, and like them obliterated, does not come about. Kip is never punished nor upbraided for his genocidal barbarism.)

Likewise, the final scene in Farmer consists of a discussion of how population growth leads to hunger, famine and war, and how societies rise and fall in a dismal and unalterable cycle of ponderous historical forces no one can control. Fatalism is likewise not a civilized value.

However and finally, certain science fiction books can be used to teach the youths science. To this end, I suggest only those authors who are loyal to John W Campbell Junior’s notions of realistic or ‘hard’ science fiction, who include both informative and entertaining ‘infodumps’ in their works. Let me mention specifically the book just named: Have Space Suit, Will Travel. It has the most crisp and well written description of how a spacesuit of the future (at the time it was written) might be.

But even less scientifically accurate works contain reams of information about astronomy and physics of which the general public is sadly uninformed or underinformed. I have read news articles by writers who did not know the difference between a star and a galaxy, or thought that a light-year was a measure of time. Since I am not the only one here being asked this question, and since I am confident wiser heads than mine will answer along these lines, I will not list the books best suited to teaching the basics of science.

I will close with an observation that some science fiction works teach more science than some so called nonfiction works, such as Cosmos by Carl Sagan, which at times seems more concerned with teaching science-worship rather than true science.

Since science-worship and not true science is part of the dominant paradigm of this present age of darkness, it is exactly this kind of nonsense science fiction is in an unique position to subvert, in order that truth be smuggled in to the hungry young past the watchful dragons of our present political masters.

If science fiction could teach the young true science, that is, true skepticism, rather than the gape-mouthed gullible emotionalism they are current taught, the world would be changed and much for the better.

About JP Frantz (2322 Articles)
Has nothing interesting to say so in the interest of time, will get on with not saying it.

30 Comments on MIND MELD: SF/F Stories For English Lit Class

  1. I do like a lot of these ideas. SF and Fantasy are both worthy of being in an English Literature Class.

    I am surprised only John C Wright mentioned Gene Wolfe, who would definitely be a candidate for a Nobel Prize for Literature in a just world.

  2. Great question, I had an SF class when I was an undergrad, it focused on SF and no Fantasy but my Mythology and Arthurian classes balanced that out.

    In putting together a syllabus/reading list, I think the key is providing students with material across the years to represent what SF was doing in reaction to the world at the time.

    Some Wells for starters, as well as FRANKENSTEIN are musts. Heinlein should have at least one book, maybe the two seemingly diametrically opposed novels STRANGER IN A STRANGE LAND and STARSHIP TROOPERS. Philip K. Dick should have a book, at least. There’s enough of his work to really pull any of his novels as representative but let’s go with THE MAN IN THE HIGH CASTLE since it is his best known and a foundational novel for Alternate History. I’d also include some o the New Wave folks on the list- J.G. Ballard, Moorcock, Zelazny.

    Dune, of course.

    Throw on an anthology or two, maybe the SF Hall of Fame or one of Hartwell’s mammoth anthologies.

    More modern authors to include, Robert Charles Wilson, Robert J. Sawyer, Connie Willis, Lois Bujold, Greg Bear, Gene Wolfe.

  3. I’d try to convey a sense of historical depth, range of approaches, and excellence in writing. What follows would easily fill up a year-long course; actually it’s a little overstuffed.

    Unit 1 — Pre-SF SF

    More — “Utopia”
    Shelley — “Frankenstein”
    Wells — “The Time Machine”
    Stapledon –“Last and First Men”
    Shorts by Kipling, Forster, Burroughs, Howard

    Unit 2 — Genre SF

    Bester — “The Demolished Man”
    Sturgeon — “More Than Human”
    Heinlein — “Double Star”
    Brackett — “The Long Tomorrow”
    Shorts by Bester, Asimov, Clarke, Cordwainer Smith

    Unit 3 — New Wave

    Ballard — “The Drowned World”
    Delany — “Empire Star”
    Le Guin — “The Left Hand of Darkness”
    Russ — “The Female Man”
    Shorts by Zelazny, Ellison, Tiptree

    Unit 4 — Next Waves

    Gibson — “Neuromancer”
    Bear — “Blood Music”
    McHugh — “China Mountain Zhang”
    Griffith — “Slow River”
    Shorts by Chiang, Link, Willis, Crowley

  4. And that was the last time anyone innocently asked John C. Wright for a book recommendation EVER AGAIN.

    • My thought was that John C. Wright must have mistaken the the question to be “What should a true Victorian education consist of?” I cannot believe how puritanical he came across with his answer. I’ve not read any of his books yet, and now am not likely to.

      • Matt Sturges // October 4, 2012 at 12:59 pm //

        I think Wright was being facetious. At least, I *hope* he was being facetious!

        • John C Wright // October 8, 2012 at 10:39 am //

          Ironically, the complaint against me here seems to be that what I say is so preposterous that I cannot be taken seriously, so I ought not be answered.

          But what is actually happening is that what I say cannot be answered (for that would require honest reason), and therefore dare not be taken seriously.

          Merely labeling an idea as outside the orbit of correct and approved thought, but not engaging the idea, is a sign of conditioning, not of education.

          Not only is it not preposterous, it is not even controversial to say that the purpose of education is to promote virtue in the young. This is something all generations hitherto, and more than half of the current generation, has believed since Plato and Confucius.

          The problem is primarily linguistic. In Newspeak, there is no word for “honesty.” Ideas are judged on being either fashionable or not, current or not, politically useful or not.

          Whether they are logical is something the modern student is not educated to consider. Modern education consists of conditioning emotional responses, such as automatic scorn provoked when someone speaks of virtue.

          One would think fans of science fiction to be less parochial, less conventional, less conformist.


    • John C Wright // October 6, 2012 at 1:14 pm //

      But of course. A man who recommends Homer’s ILIAD must be a crackpot.

      • Sean M. Brooks // October 6, 2012 at 11:20 pm //

        Dear Mr. Wright:

        And anyone who dares to recommend Dante’s DIVINE COMEDY and Edgar Rice Burroughs Barsoom books is thereby convicted of being guilty of double plus ungood thought crime by the “progressive” masters of our decadent age. And fit only to be cast out into outer darkness with wailing and gnashing of teeth!

        • Yes! That’s Right! He’s so oppressed! I particularly like the way that SF Signal continues to deny him a voice by habitually inviting him onto mind melds.

          • Sean M. Brooks // October 9, 2012 at 2:23 am //


            But, I was not criticizing “SFSignal.” I was expressing my disagreement with the attacks on Mr. Wright in the comment box. I thought my previous comment made that plain, at least by implication. To imply otherwise is dishonest.

          • You have still not said a single thing.

  5. SF books to include on an English Literature course..
    This really is a tough question.
    For one, do we assume that only SF gets to go in the curriculum? That’s how, apparently, the responses have focused – though the question seems to imply adding choice SF to existing listings rather than replacing them entirely.

    I have to agree with lorq’s suggestion of dividing the listing into distinct sections.

    Liked to see Dan Simmon’s Hyperion being mentioned. Also, knowing how messed up some lit classes can be, I’d go as far as to reccommend Simmon’s Olympos/Illium. It would be very interesting to see students handle those two books, especially if they aren’t the students’ own choice (if you’ve read them, you know what I mean).

    Also, What would be better – assuming the students have other genre books in this or other classes of similar release time – to present a listing of strict sci-fi “classics”, or to give the experimental/wild outliers of SF that intertwine, borrow and play off of other genres? On the one hand, giving them classics would possibly present a better sense of what the core of sci-fi was up to 90’s or so, and help them define the genre. On the other hand, SF has changed a lot in last few years, becoming far more focused on the fantastical and disconnected from actuality (this is a good read on the subject: )… So, perhaps experimenting the blurred borders oh Rajaniemmi’s, Mieville’s, Bacigalupi’s works would suit the students better to grasp the epheremality of the genre rather than sticking to “hard men in 50’s-style spaceships chasing mcguffins”?

  6. Michael O. // October 3, 2012 at 2:13 pm //

    As a teacher, I have found some science fiction is difficult to teach because sfnal inventions like ansibles or hyperspace, and others because they rely on other, deeper aspects of sf, what we generally call genre conventions. Works like Brave New World or A Flower for Algernon were written for readers outside the genre, but Heinlein and the rest wrote for genre fans and won’t be immediately accessible to the general reader. Samuel R. Delany famously discussed these problems in his MLA talk:

    The biggest success I’ve had is with Ray Bradbury, himself almost outside the genre, at least in the way he uses conventions. Gene Wolfe, Orson Scott Card, Walter M. Miller Jr. – these worked well. Short stories were easier than novels because they were more likely to explain fictional inventions or concepts and have fewer of them. But Isaac Asimov, whom I consider to be a much less profound writer than most of those mentioned previously, was horribly difficult for them. Why? Because English students are used to profundity, having seen it in Shakespeare and Chaucer and Fitzgerald. They’re not used to SF.

    • Isn’t that a slight flaw with the curriculum, then, if it places student minds on such a trainrail that they can only parse and consume a specific form of literature, though? I mean.. literature classes should broaden one’s perception, not narrow it.

      • Michael O. // October 4, 2012 at 10:45 am //

        “Profound” isn’t form of literature any more than “symbolism” or “meaning” or “good” are. Shakespeare and Chaucer and Fitzgerald definitely aren’t the same form of literature as each other either. And learning about them doesn’t narrow one’s perception at all – it’s not like students would be more successful jumping straight into Asimov if they’d never read Shakespeare; if anything they’d be even less successful. Learning about the canonical writers broadened their perceptions in one way; learning SF can broaden it in another.

        I certainly support broadening students’ perceptions, or else I wouldn’t be teaching SF. I’m not saying don’t teach Asimov; I’m saying teach it with the awareness that you’ll have to do some scaffolding first, with authors that bridge their comfort and discomfort.

        As another example, when I taught Chinese literature, I started with readings on Taoism, Confucianism and Chinese history. I didn’t say jump right into Journey to the West and figure it out on your own. Most readers just won’t get as much out of it that way.

        • Fair enough, ‘form’ was the wrong word, I suppose. Still, it sounds from your post that the students are accustomed to a specific.. er.. ‘depth'(?), ‘layering'(?) to what’s written – seeking said profoundness and having issues when there is just the text and none of the subtext/subsubtext. That still implies a certain amount of fixed-approach on their side..

          Still, I do appreciate that you are actively including SF in the curriculum at all, which is more than I can say for what little lit classes I have had. Still, I’d say that if something is difficult for them, then good – it only drives the point that they should approach a given work without preconceptions of expected profundity, but let the sense of what’s there emerge naturally.

  7. High-level self-parody from Wright there…

    If you made the mistake of taking him seriously you’d assume he was a pompous lunatic.

    “The watchdogs of the establishment, O my revolutionary brothers and sisters, are slow-eyed and stupid, and we may be able to smuggle in the form of literature and entertainment works of art which subvert the paradigm, and rescue the next generation from the present age of darkness.”

    Oh well played sir! Well played.

    • I guarantee you, Mr. Wright is deadly serious. Check out his blog ( and see for yourself. This is the wonted level of turgid, smug ponderousness those of us who are (all too) familiar with this self-righteous crackpot have come to expect. “Additionally, education must instruct the youth in the Christian faith and classical virtues (fortitude, temperance, justice, prudence)…” He ain’t joking, folks.

      • Hm. It reads an awful lot like a fake persona/parody.

      • Doesn’t it, though? Unfortunately, Mr. Wright is simply the “pompous lunatic” referred to above. Any self-parody, I assure you, is completely unintentional (though hilarious).

      • Ye Olde Statistician // October 6, 2012 at 8:52 pm //

        Of the classic virtues – fortitude, temperance, justice, and prudence – which do you find objectionable?

        What of the three intellective virtues – understanding, knowledge, and wisdom?

        Should education not be challenging? The word means “a leading forth.”

      • Richard Bell // October 7, 2012 at 11:30 am //

        Why should he joke? The elephant in the room is that all things of indisputable value in Western Civilization are the fruits of christianity.

        Science? The Greeks thought about science and wrote stuff down, but performed no experiments to see if their musings were correct. The Romans used science to build stuff, but made no effort to expand it. The Arabs were thrilled when they discovered greek and roman scientific manuscripts (thanks to copies written by christian monks), but after deciding that science did not lead to faith, abandoned it for other things. For christians, the Book of Wisdom states that God counted, measured, and weighed all things, thus making the quest for scientific knowledge a good and noble calling.

        Everyone remembers that Galileo was right about heliocentric motion, but ignores that his proof was so wrong that his fellow astronomers disagreed with him, even if they were also heliocentrists.

        Anyone who claims that the Catholic Church has held back science has to explain why western science only flourished in christian europe.

        Human rights and the rule of law are both outgrowths of christian philosophy. Compare Bill Gates to a Walmart Greeter. Only Jesus could say that they are equal, without being laughed at.

        Christianity saved the romans, maybe it can save us.

        • I personally agree with just about all of this. Science and the quest for truth are undeniably an outgrowth of Christianity, and could never have arisen without it. Much like modern safety razors wouldn’t exist today had swords made out of Damascus steel not been invented.

          But you don’t see me shaving my face with a zweihander, do you?

    • Pompous? Maybe. Lunatic? Nope, but it is amusing to watch PC ppl be shocked, SHOCKED he writes such things.

      • I’m not shocked… I’m amused.

        And ‘PC people’ really? The only people who complain about political correctness are bigots and neanderthals.

        • Is this irony intentional?

          Do you understand what people are speaking of when they complain of political correctness? They are complaining about a disingenuous manipulation of language that makes it difficult to speak clearly.

        • Pierce O. // October 7, 2012 at 9:38 pm //

          Oh look, an informal logical fallacy. Whatever will we neanderthals do?!

  8. Another great mind meld. I’m much more curious what teachers (and fans of sci fi) would think rather than authors.

    I would probably consider Bester, Wolfe, Vonnegut, Orwell, and Bradbury.

  9. Arizona Mike // October 8, 2012 at 11:18 pm //

    I have never read or heard of John C. Wright before this, but now I will seek out his writing. He is spot-on in his recommendations and pedagogy. Thanks for the link to his blog, David H.

    My additional recommendations would include “A Case of Conscience” by James Blish, “You’re all Alone” by Fritz Leiber, and “The Postman” by David Brin (never let them see the movie). Many schools teach “Lord of the Flies,” it might be worth pairing it with Heinlein’s “Tunnel in the Sky” to compare two visions of human nature and society. For dystopias, pairing “The Sound of His Horn” by Sarban (if you could find enough copies for textbooks!) with “The Wanting Seed” by Anthony Burgess would also be worthwhile.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: