News Ticker

The Literary Novels of Philip K. Dick

James Wallace Harris maintains a website devoted to identifying the Classics of Science Fiction. He is fascinated by how books are remembered and forgotten, and often writes about science fiction at his blog, Auxiliary Memory.

The Literary Novels of Philip K. Dick

by James Wallace Harris

Now that Amazon is showing The Man in the High Castle, the popular and critically acclaimed streaming mini-series, based on the novel by Philip K. Dick, I think it’s an excellent time to mention some of Phil’s other books that deserved to be remembered. Success always eluded PKD in his lifetime (1928-1982), even though he eventually published 44 novels and 121 short stories. He was legendary in the small world of science fiction fandom while he lived, but didn’t become globally famous until Hollywood started showing his stories, beginning with Blade Runner, after he died. Since then, Hollywood has slowly grown PKD’s world-wide pop-culture legacy. However, filmmakers have praised PKD in a strange way, seemingly only loving his far out plots and settings, always gutting the characterization, turning his characters who are suffering quiet desperation into action heroes.

We think of Philip K. Dick solely as a science fiction writer, but is that what he wanted? Between 1952-1960 Dick wrote nine literary novels hoping to be accepted as a mainstream writer, a during the 1950s he struggled to pay bills by selling science fiction short stories to the dying pulp magazine market. Between 1955-1960 he published eight science fiction novels, and all but one went to Ace Books, a low rent paperback publisher. His one hardback success during that time, Time Out of Joint, was published in 1959 by Lippincott, and it is a science fiction story that leans towards the literary. I imagined that made him very happy.

What is the big deal between genre and literary? Why would a writer want literary recognition over popular genre fame? Philip K. Dick was a large fish swimming in the gutter of 1950s and 1960s publishing, and science fiction got very little respect back then. Would PKD actually preferred to be any size fish in the larger 20th century literary pond? I think those nine rejected novels say yes. It’s important to understand the difference between literary fiction and genre fiction, and we can see the difference by comparing The Man in the High Castle book with The Man in the High Castle miniseries.

Literary fiction is observational. For example, two of the greatest novels of the 20th century, Ulysses by James Joyce and In Search of Lot Time by Marcel Proust, fictionally chronicle real people, places and events in obsessive detail. Artists of literary masterpieces work to capture reality in precisely detailed sentences, whereas genre fiction stories are made up and heavily designed around plot and storytelling. In a way, literary and genre are two ends of a spectrum: some of the best genre writers will base their characters and plots on actual people and events, and some famous literary works embrace fantastic story ideas.

PKD’s The Man in the High Castle has a setting of genre ideas. The characters, though, feel very literary, as if their manners and traits were drawn from people Dick watched when imagining his novel. The film version of the novel kept his genre setting, replaced his literary characters with genre characterizations using Dick’s character names, and gave the story more action and plot. I’m not sure if modern audiences would have liked a filmed version that stayed true to the original novel, since it would have been slow and subtle. But, that’s exactly the kind of story I love in my old age, and it was the story that won the Hugo Award for Best Novel in 1963.

When I was younger I loved genre fiction because I was thrilled by exciting ideas and plots, and characters didn’t matter as much to me. Now my tastes have shifted to the literary side of the spectrum, and in recent years I’ve been seeking out Dick’s early rejected novels. This morning I started listening to The Broken Bubble, one of Philip K. Dick’s mainstream novels written in 1956, and was immediately mesmerized by its portrait of the 1950s, a time I remember from my childhood. I’ve been a fan of Philip K. Dick’s science fiction stories since 1967, but whenever I’ve read one of his literary novels, I feel I’m reading PKD at his best. In fact, my favorite PKD novel is Confessions of a Crap Artist.

When I decided to write this essay about the literary novels of Philip K. Dick I checked Google and discovered the essay I imagined I’d write had already written by Bruce Gillespie back in 1990: “The Non-Science Fiction Novels of Philip K. Dick 1928-1982.” Reading Gillespie, I realized that even though these novels were rejected by publishers, and many of PKD’s fans, there are a few of us precisely tuned to resonate with Dick’s mainstream ambitions. I delighted in each detail while listening to The Broken Bubble, wondering where Dick found each, and Jim Briskin, Patricia Gray, Art and Rachel Emmanuel seem achingly lifelike. Listening to the novel made me want to research Dick’s life around the time he wrote The Broken Bubble to discover if his fictional characters were based on real people. Was the story’s science fiction club “The Beings From Earth” based on a science fiction club Dick attended?

Many people do not like PKD’s literary stories, finding them too filled with ordinary bits of daily life and dull. Kim Stanley Robinson wrote his Ph.D. thesis, The Novels of Philip K. Dick, and completely dismissed them. So, why are these early PKD novels so disliked by many, but loved by some? While listening to The Broken Bubble I thought, “If I could only write like this, I’d be the novelist I dream of being,” but the reality is I’d be writing books few readers would want to read.

Gillespie also suggests something I was going to write in my planned essay, that some of Dick’s science fiction novels are very literary, and even like his mundane novels. Here’s a list of PKD’s non-SF novels that were mostly published after his death in 1982. I copied this information from the excellent “The Mainstream Novels of Philip K. Dick” which has details of publication history, as well as cover images of all the various editions. Dates are (written/published).

  • Voices from the Street (1952/2007)
  • Gather Yourselves Together (1952/1994)
  • Mary and the Giant (1953/1987)
  • The Broken Bubble (1956/1988)
  • Puttering About in a Small Land (1957/1985)
  • In Milton Lumky Territory (1958/1986)
  • Confessions of a Crap Artist (1959/1975)
  • Humpty Dumpty in Oakland (1960/1987)
  • The Man Whose Teeth Were All Exactly Alike (1960/1975)

Gillespie create two other groups, which I also imagined beforehand, but mine are slightly different. I think Dick wrote a number of science fiction novels that seemed like they were influenced by the style and characterization of his literary novels, which meant the characters could have been based on impressions from real people Dick knew. They are also PKD’s science fiction novels that I admire most.

  • Time Out of Joint (1959)
  • The Man in the High Castle (1962)
  • Martian Time-Slip (1964)
  • We Can Build You (1972)
  • A Scanner Darkly (1977)

I consider literary novels to be works of fiction where writers work to describe reality. They are full of observed details, and are often based on real incidents and people. Because of the fantastic nature of science fiction, it’s hard for science fiction to be literary, but sometimes science fiction writers can write about made-up situations in a way that feels very real. One reason I call A Scanner Darkly literary is because Dick was inspired by people he knew who died using drugs, although he fictionally reincarnates them into an unbelievable plot and setting.

Finally, Dick wrote his hard-to-classify visionary novels that lean toward the literary and spiritual, and feature some of his best mature writing. I also include with these the Exegesis he wrote while working on the VALIS trilogy. The three stories are based on Dick’s mystical experiences of February and March of 1974, and even as they get more fantastic fictionally, we feel Dick desperately seeking to find some kind of objective truth from his real world experiences. These novels are based on one shattering event Dick experienced eight years before he died, and it seems his last years were obsessed with understanding this experience. Was it madness or revelation? This led Dick to chase after Gnosticism, a very gnarly form of ontology.

  • VALIS (1978)
  • The Divine Invasion (1980)
  • The Transmigration of Timothy Archer (1981)
  • The Exegesis of Philip K. Dick (2011)

Will any of these stories get the Hollywood movie treatment or be made into streaming mini-series? I doubt it. Although, I could imagine an HBO miniseries based on Philip K. Dick’s life. Such a biographical series describing PKD’s reality would certainly be more interesting than the biopics they’ve produced so far, or at least further out. PKD was one strange dude that lived one strange life and this is why I love reading his literary novels. They are clues to how PKD thought.  One aspect of literary fiction is it often makes the reader want to study biography, and great works of literary fiction often become a Tesseract of mystery. Even though novels must be standalone works of art, their beauty can be enhanced by biographical study. If you’ve ever fallen into the Black Hole of Jack Kerouac and The Beats, you’ll know what I mean. Literary novels become lost journals left by reality explorers, and Philip K. Dick went to some very strange places.

About James Wallace Harris (9 Articles)
James Wallace Harris is fascinated by the concept of science fiction, its history and execution. Jim searches for science fiction where writers use scientific knowledge to explore the possibilities of what reality could exhibit beyond our current observations or extrapolates on what reality could unfold in the future. He delights in stories with original speculation that offers philosophical thought experiments which entertain our sense of wonder. Jim studies old science fiction to understand how people of the past imagined the nature of their existence.
Contact: Website

7 Comments on The Literary Novels of Philip K. Dick

  1. Richard Fahey // December 17, 2015 at 9:47 am //

    That is an excellent article.I don’t think I’ve read anything quite like this about Philip K.Dick before,one where the disparate and contradicting facets of his work are examined separately and form a cohesive unit.It was this posturing away from literary convention,that made him a great,modern author,not the usual adhererence to it.This is in sharp contrast for instance to another sf figure such as Ursula LeGuin,whose work comes closer to literary expectations.

    During the mid-1960s,when he wrote furiously for Ace,he nevertheless created a body of work that is unique and defies classifying.The same period however produced the “The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch”,that courted but seemed different to normal mainstream literature,and wasn’t comparible to the other novels he wrote at the same time.He constantly defied literary logic,but it also seemed to make him great.

    “Time Out of Joint” is a crossing point for his literary and sf ambitions,and had he been given the chance to do what he really wanted,at least in sf,this is what his stuff would have been like I think.I don’t know what form his work could have taken if he had written within general literature,whether or not he would have wrote plainly realistic literature,or non-generic sf in the tradition of someone such as Olaf Stapleton.It seems obvious that he was too maverick for mainstream literature,and found a comfortable home within the science fiction genre,where he developed in a way that could never have happened outside it’s confines.The later “The Man in the High Castle”,as has already been said,bridged science fiction and modern literary novels.It is indefinable but great.

    Philip K.Dick has been very important to me.He has been a spiritual friend in a literary sense.His writing was concrete and believable,that is something all the best authors will try and achieve.

  2. Thanks Richard. I wonder how many of us love to read the mainstream novels of PKD? I think Dick mixed in as much mimetic fiction into his science fiction as he had time. Many of the Ace novels were written in a hurry and he didn’t have the time. Evidently Dick had more time to give Time Out of Joint, Martian Time-Slip and The Man in the High Castle.

    • Richard Fahey // January 13, 2016 at 2:33 pm //

      Philip K.Dick was the Science fiction author who lead me away from science fiction.He was writing his own kind of fiction within genre Science Fiction.What he wrote was unique and couldn’t be branded under any marketing name.It didn’t matter to me if his stuff couldn’t be called science fiction,even though writing within it allowed him to become what he was,so it would have been ridiculous not to read his mainstream novels.

      Do those who who don’t read his non-sf novels,just like his stuff because he’s a science fiction author?If if that’s true,he’s probably just another science fiction author among several they like,having no particular preference.They just follow those under the science fiction banner.

      Yes,those three novels weren’t written in a rush for any papperback house,but I think Dick was always aware,if unconsiously,of the external world when writing his books and shorter pieces.It was probably just less noticable in the novels that lacked the face of more orthodox literary novels.”Martian Time-Slip” was eventually taken by a paperback publisher other than the more conservative Ace,and attracted little critical attention.During this time,as you know,”The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch” was published in hardcover,and obviously contained much what you call mimetic fiction.

      • Richard I just bought and started reading “The Search for Philip K. Dick” by Anne R. Dick. Dick met Anne when he was finishing up “Time Out of Joint” and they were married 1959-1965, during the time he wrote many of the novels we’re discussing. I’m hoping her biography of PKD will reveal more about those novels.

        • Richard Fahey // January 14, 2016 at 3:08 pm //

          I’ll be interested to know what you think then when you’ve finished the book.

          I was in my local library this morning and see a copy of “Humpty Dumpty in Oakland”,but it was in the SF section.This is because it’s published as SF.Still SF readers and fans of Dick will see it,and if they read it,will probably be surprised to find out that it’s not SF!Will they like it though?

  3. Richard Fahey // January 14, 2016 at 3:18 pm //

    I see “Humpty Dumpty in Oakland” at my local library this morning.It was in the SF section,but of course,is also marketed as such.I wonder if fans of Dick or SF,will like it?

  4. Richard Fahey // January 15, 2016 at 7:30 am //

    Sorry there’s two.The first one didn’t appear when I first posted it.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: